NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds - View Single Post

Fasterthanyou · 11-04-2004, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilverTransAm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fasterthanyou

lol, where do you people get your facts? I don't know about you but I'd trust my government's inteligence (that doesn't leak into the media) over rumors that just so happen to make it onto TV.
I don't want to get into a fight here but if you think Bush WANTED to put soldiers in harms way for his own ambishons then please, PLEASE come up with some proof. I think that's just aweful that you think our commander in chief cares more about his own little life (which is already comfortable) than he does about his fellow Americans. He's been going after Bin Laden, who said he has stopped

. Spreading too thin, can you say TERRORISTS ATTACKED US, we need to focus on them before Suddan and N.Koria. We have PLENTY of support if N.Koria wanted to attack the States. Going over there would only encourage a war, not prevent one. The Iraq war was inevitable, I think of it as preventive maintenance. Get a government in there that'll be for the people and you'll find it's easier to keep good relations. Removing Saddam should have been done in the Desert Storm war, he's nothing but a modern day Hitler.
What Islamn needs to do if they want the US to stop it's ocupation; DENOUNCE TERRORISM!!! But they don't do it because either a) they believe in it, b) they are weak from fear of a dictator, c) they need us to show them how great Capitalism is for a stagnent 3rd world economy. They would be like Isreal if they had some form or voting.
Why can't they denounce terrorism.... because they've got dictators that have had their lives threatened by terrorists. See why dictators are a bad thing in that area of the world and why we need to go over there if they aren't going to show us they aren't giving weapons to Terrorists! I'm glad we reacted and didn't wait for another 9/11 attack. Saddam is to blame for the war, he didn't keep his end of the bargon with the UN inspectors. We KNEW he had the technology for the weapons because he used them on his own people in the 90's AND we sold them to him in the 80's!!! If we can't find them now I'm still a little worried. Where did the weapons we sold him go? Anybody else a little worried about that? 4 more years of a president that doesn't give me lip service. That's the problem with Kerry, he just gives us what we want to hear and he's too much of a people pleaser. I'd rather have a guy (when we're at war) that knows how to finish what he started. I don't believe Kerry would pull out of Iraq. I just think he'd try too hard to get international support and not lead by example.

are you kidding? do you read the news or time magazine or watch tv? saddam got rid of all his weapons when we asked him to! he was bluffing with 2 7 off suit! he made us think that he had weapons, even though he said he didn't have them. what happened to bush and colin powell's irrefutable evidence of saddam's weapons? if the "war" is over, why can't they reveal their sources?

you say he hasn't stopped going after bin laden, but the majority of our forces aren't in afghanistan. wouldn't you agree that punishing the man responsible for 9/11 is a little more important then giving the iraqi people the right to vote (and IMO, they'll just elect somebody that we don't want in there anyway). remember what happened in iran in the 70's, when we placed a leader in there? he was overthrown and replaced by the current "government".

and there is NO way saddam was capable of a 9/11 like attack. why can't you just admit that going into iraq at the time we did was the wrong move? there are plenty of other things we could've taken care of (like saudi arabia, which blatantly supports and funds terrorists, not to mention the majority of the 9/11 planners and hijackers were from saudi arabia, including bin laden).

i support our troops 100%, and i think they're doing the best job that they can in a bad situation. the reason the situation is bad is because bush outplayed his hand. history repeats itself.

Keep believing everything the libral media sources tells you

. Bluffing my ass, again, even if that were true it's still Saddam that was the instigator. Why do you keep wanting to blaim Bush for things nobody else could have predicted. Remember, Kerry ALSO wanted to go in. Or wait, didn't he also say he wouldn't have given the hind sight... yeah, wouldn't we ALL like to have 100% accurate inteligence and in Kerry's case, foreshadowing abilities, lol.
You make it out as if the media is where Bush gets his inteligence from. PLEASE tell me you don't believe everything you read. Agendias are everywhere, I just think that Bush wasn't going to war because of his. It wasn't JUST Bush that wanted to go into Iraq mind you, it was everybody (democrats included). It just so happened that Bush had to make the final say.
Would I be wrong to assume you believe the 9/11 attack was Bush's fault and not Clintons or hey, maybe Osama himself?