View Single Post
Old 11-28-2004, 07:15 PM   #27
Fasterthanyou
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery NJ
Posts: 1,271
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeakersGoBoom
does GM currently make any cars like that? completely impractical, rediculously expensive cars that get a fraction of a mile to the gallon, but are able to be considered "supercars"? that can compete with cars like ferrari, lambo, etc?
They don't. They have prototype cars that the engineers to nutz on, and then back off to like "normal way over priced ugly junk with nothing special about it."
Oh, and mph had almost nothing to do with the engine horsepower and everything to do with tuning, gearing, and vehicle weight. Those 32v heads might flow a ton but that just means I can run a smaller cam with that turbo and make awesome low end grunt. Then there's the like 2400lbs which takes less work to move than something that weight 1000lbs more (less work = less energy = less power). Don't forget the transmission, with the 6 speeds and like 3.73's out back I'd bet I'd get 16city/30highway. The highway would be effected by the cars aero and which tires I choose. Trust me, hp does NOT = gass guzzler. The c5 vettes are a perfect example.
__________________
, Jon
Owner of a Red Sled.
If it\'s EFI I can tune it. Specialize in 82-95 GM (yes Lt1\'s)
\"If you can leave black marks on a straight from the time you exit a corner till the time you brake for the next turn.......Then, you have enough horsepower\" - Mark Donohue
Fasterthanyou is offline   Reply With Quote