Thread: #$(@ you LT1's
View Single Post
Old 03-22-2010, 04:32 PM   #37
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,473
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow-V6 View Post
I guess you miss the part that this is a 4th gen thread not a 5th gen thread.
I guess you missed the part about me ignoring the 3.4 vs 3.8 comments and directly quoting Vinny's comment, which was in reference to this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
is that why gm abandoned the 690's in favor of the 660 design?
GM chose to develop the 60* v6 platform for the future and drop the 90* platform, and based on the current crop of v6 engines that are being offered in today's cars, it sure looks to me like they made the right choice.

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote