View Single Post
Old 12-29-2015, 04:24 PM   #23
redsoxsstink
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: milltown
Posts: 1,497
iTrader: (2)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrong generation View Post
given the fact that as technology gets more advanced it gets cheaper. and the fact that most of the tech and stuff in the 2016 camaro is atleast 10-15 years old tech. there is no valid reason for the over inflated price of the 2016 camaro. there is nothing in the camaro that depends such high price tags.
the brand new lt1 engine? magnetic ride? massive brembos? light(er) weight aluminum chassis? it all doesnt come free.

hi-tech tech is not cheap. regardless how advance production methods are, the materials that are within these components are not cheap. in addition it costs money to engineer a car to today's standards, millions are spent on emissions crap that is required now and not previously. the consumer has to pay for all this time and development in the long run. manufactures wont do it for free.
__________________
2002 Camaro Sunset Orange Mettalic, V6, 5spd, bilstein HD shocks and struts, eibach pro lowering kit, eibach f/r sway bars, lakewood PHB, UMI 2 point subframe connectors, energy suspensions poly master bushing kit
daily econobox and first car

1986 IROC-Z, T56, MGW shifter, Heads, Cam, Holley Stealth Ram 350, t-top, tubular LCA with relo brackets, adjustable PHB, belltech sway bars, ground control weight jacks, SLP mid length headers, 3in w/borla XR1, RIP 3 10 bolts, 12.7 @ 109 so far.. atleast its faster than stock SOLD

1971 Camaro LS3/T56/9in, cam only and still carbed, RIP 2 10 bolts, 11.62@121

03 Blazer 2 door - salt sponge
redsoxsstink is offline