Thread: 1973 Camaro LT
View Single Post
Old 07-10-2014, 01:50 PM   #35
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Its great to say nothing would have happened had the car not been there but I know someone who got a nice check from someone's insurance company when they tried to use that argument in court. Don't confuse traffic law with a lawsuit.

The contention to the negative is invalid on it's face anyway, the Camaro had a dealer plate on it. Dealer plates are registration and insurance for short term transit. So even if the classic car policy that had been applied for wasn't in place yet there was a policy on the car making it legal to park on the street.

-Tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote