NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds - View Single Post

MyFirstZ · 09-05-2014, 11:19 AM

yeah i agree, i didn't take into consideration the 40 TQ jump. All three pulls were almost identical and were all back to back with no changes.

its the FTP lid forgot the diameter. and no I didnt plan on stepping up from the MAF any further. The car was street tuned, and I have an a/f gauge in the car reading 12.7 at WOT.

As far as the pulls themselves go the operator was letting off before 7k since thats where my shift light is set to and we didnt have a true tac signal. The RPM is based on roller speed. That another reason why i think the peak might be lower. I got to get on another one and have a tach signal

I am hopefully going to make it saturday to island and see how it does to get a better idea.

09-05-2014, 11:19 AM	#6
MyFirstZ Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY Posts: 1,915 iTrader: (8) Social Networks:	yeah i agree, i didn't take into consideration the 40 TQ jump. All three pulls were almost identical and were all back to back with no changes. its the FTP lid forgot the diameter. and no I didnt plan on stepping up from the MAF any further. The car was street tuned, and I have an a/f gauge in the car reading 12.7 at WOT. As far as the pulls themselves go the operator was letting off before 7k since thats where my shift light is set to and we didnt have a true tac signal. The RPM is based on roller speed. That another reason why i think the peak might be lower. I got to get on another one and have a tach signal I am hopefully going to make it saturday to island and see how it does to get a better idea. __________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56 Last edited by MyFirstZ; 09-05-2014 at 11:30 AM.