Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-28-2005, 04:09 PM   #1
sikbyrd350
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: border of Union Cnty/Somerset Cnty/Middlesex Cnty.
Posts: 455
iTrader: (0)
Loud Exhaust law

The state of New Jersey has yet to adopt the SAE 95 db limit. But currently there is a bill being passed..

Show your support of this bill and support of our right to our hobby contact Assemblyman Gordon and members of the New Jersey Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee immediately by phone at (609) 292-5135 or e-mail to request their support of the 95-decibel limit under SAE J1169.

Moderators Please make this a sticky and people please spread the word around to other auto forums in NJ.



Legislation to Establish Exhaust Noise Limit Introduced in New Jersey; to be Considered by Assembly Committee - January 2005



URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT

Legislation to Establish Exhaust Noise Limit Introduced in New Jersey; to be Considered by Assembly Committee

Legislation (A.B. 3738) that would require the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to prescribe a decibel limit to which all aftermarket mufflers sold in the state would have to be certified to operate has been introduced in the New Jersey State Legislature. The bill, introduced By Assemblyman Robert Gordon, gives no instruction as to what the decibel limit should be.

In some states, noise limits for modified exhaust systems are established by a SEMA model bill (attached) and applicable to an easy to administer test standard. The SEMA model provides for the testing of vehicle exhaust noise to a standard adopted by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) with an established noise limit of 95-decibels (SAE J1169). Under the SAE standard, a sound meter is placed 20 inches from the exhaust outlet at a 45-degree angle and the engine is revved to three quarters of maximum rated horsepower. The highest decibel reading is then recorded.

To date, with the popular support of vehicle enthusiasts and related businesses, the model has been enacted in California, Washington State and Maine. This year, the SEMA model was introduced in Virginia.

Contact members of the New Jersey Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee (List to Follow) to request their support for a 95-decibel limit under SAE J1169

The SEMA model removes subjective provisions in the law and force compliance with an objectively measured standard. Under the standard, exhaust noise could not exceed a sound reading of 95-decibels under a fair and predictable test.
The SEMA model would benefit consumers, the aftermarket industry and police officers who are charged with enforcing the law.
The SEMA model would remedy the enforcement policy currently used by police officers in which nearly all exhaust system modifications are considered illegal, even where noise levels are not excessive or unusual. This policy leaves enthusiasts, exhaust system manufacturers and dealers without recourse, despite having the law on their side.
The SEMA model recognizes that aftermarket exhaust systems are designed to make vehicles run more efficiently without increasing emissions.
The SEMA model removes authority for the calculation of a decibel limit from state regulators and puts it back in the hands of your elected representatives.
DON’T DELAY! Please contact Assemblyman Gordon and members of the New Jersey Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee immediately by phone at (609) 292-5135 or e-mail to request their support of the 95-decibel limit under SAE J1169.

NJ Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee

John F. McKeon
Email: asmmckeon@njleg.org

Michael J. Panter (District 12 - Colts Neck Township)
Email: Legislative Contact Service

Larry Chatzidakis
Email: AsmChatzidakis@njleg.org

Robert M. Gordon (District 38 - Cliffside Park Borough)
Email: Legislative Contact Service

Reed Gusciora
Email: reednj15@aol.com

Louis Manzo (District 31 - Bayonne City)
Email: Legislative Contact Service

John E. Rooney
Email: AsmRooney@njleg.org


PROPOSED AMENDMENT (changes in [brackets])

*** THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENT THROUGH P.L. 2002 CH. 62, 8/6/2002 ***
*** NOVEMBER 8, 2002 ANNOTATION SERVICE ***

TITLE 39. MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC REGULATION
SUBTITLE 1. MOTOR VEHICLES GENERALLY; TRAFFIC LAWS
CHAPTER 3. MOTOR VEHICLES GENERALLY
ARTICLE 3. EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATION


GO TO CODE ARCHIVE DIRECTORY FOR THIS JURISDICTION

N.J. Stat. @ 39:3-70 (2002)

@ 39:3-70. [Mufflers]

Every motor vehicle having a combustion motor shall at all times be equipped
with a [muffler] in good working order and in constant operation to prevent
[excessive or unusual noise and] annoying smoke, AND NO PERSON SHALL MODIFY THE EXHAUST SYSTEM OF A MOTOR VEHICLE IN A MANNER SO THAT THE EXHAUST SYSTEM EMITS IN EXCESS OF NINETY-FIVE DECIBELS AS MEASURED BY THE SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERS (SAE) STANDARD J1169 (May 1998). IT SHALL NOT BE A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBSECTION UNLESS PROVEN BY PROPER AUTHORITIES THAT THE EXHAUST SYTEM MODIFICATION RESULTS IN NOISE AMPLIFICATION IN EXCESS OF NINETY-FIVE DECIBELS UNDER THE PRESCRIBED SAE TEST STANDARD.

A COURT MAY DISMISS ANY ACTION FOR WHICH A PERSON IS PROSECUTED FOR OPERATING A VEHICLE IN VIOLATION OF THIS SUBSECTION IF IT IS FOUND THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD REASONABLE GROUNDS TO BELIEVE THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT OPERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SUBSECTION.

[and] n No person shall use a [muffler] cut-out, bypass or similar device upon a motor vehicle on a highway.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0n
monkey/spanky pwn me
2003 Tarmac EVO VIII-122ci of 4-bangin fury,
intake/racing(ie catless) 3\" exhaust/HKS 272\'s/21-22lbs/ TurboXS BOV /ACT Clutch/TurboTrix tune / Wallboro(sp) 225 /
335awhp, 307awtq

1994 Formula-bolt-on, geared, programmed, sold
sikbyrd350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 04:14 PM   #2
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
new jersey doesnt have to adopt the 95db limit. it is already part of federal highway law. so you have to meet 95db on any road that was in any part paid for with federal money, which is every road everywhere in the country.
this is more a formality than anything.

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 04:55 PM   #3
robj
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 48
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
new jersey doesnt have to adopt the 95db limit. it is already part of federal highway law. so you have to meet 95db on any road that was in any part paid for with federal money, which is every road everywhere in the country.
this is more a formality than anything.

later
tim

hmm any idea what a borla with the least plate before fully open would put out?
__________________
00 Red TA M6 with a Borla Catback and MTI clear lid

always lookin for a ws6 hood if anyone has one for cheap
robj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 04:59 PM   #4
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
my 91 camaro had headers+!cat+borla with open plate and i only registered about 78db reving it to 3K in my driveway.
the standard for testing is actually supposed to be at a load and engine rpm consistant with highway travel. teh testing equipment is also supposed to be 60ft away i believe, so it has to be loud enough to exceed 95db at part throttle from 60ft away.
i can't imagien a lot of systmes actually fail this kind of test.

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 05:17 PM   #5
Ian
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
iTrader: (7)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
my 91 camaro had headers+!cat+borla with open plate and i only registered about 78db reving it to 3K in my driveway.
the standard for testing is actually supposed to be at a load and engine rpm consistant with highway travel. teh testing equipment is also supposed to be 60ft away i believe, so it has to be loud enough to exceed 95db at part throttle from 60ft away.
i can't imagien a lot of systmes actually fail this kind of test.

later
tim
The only one that comes to mind would be the SLP Loudmouth, and even at that, the car would probably need an Off-road Y-pipe to be that loud that far away.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434 View Post
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 05:53 PM   #6
SteveR
I <3 sheep
 
SteveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
new jersey doesnt have to adopt the 95db limit. it is already part of federal highway law. so you have to meet 95db on any road that was in any part paid for with federal money, which is every road everywhere in the country.
this is more a formality than anything.

later
tim
Actually NJ refuses to adopt some of the federal highway standards and chooses to make some of their own rules which is why there are tolls on 95 which is an interstate federally funded road. The government refuses to pay any financial support to states that don't adopt all of the federal standards.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
Steve has a thing for sheep....
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
SteveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 08:54 PM   #7
IROCdan330
12 Second Club
 
IROCdan330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vineland
Posts: 928
iTrader: (0)
and yet i fail inspection for loud exhaust when all ive got is some headers, a cat, and hooker cat-back. when i bring it back im gonna slap them in the face with this ****. ill tell em i tightened the bolts...and if they say its too loud ill say measure it...if tim cant be near 95 with no cat, headers, and an open plate borla...i shouldve passed just fine.
__________________
87 iroc with the usual go fast stuff
heavier than your half ton.
IROCdan330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 08:59 PM   #8
camaro2you
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,530
iTrader: (11)
how bought we all go up to the inspection station and run open headers and make them **** their pants and run like babies
camaro2you is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 10:16 PM   #9
84HOtransam
13 Second Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clifton,NJ/ Providence,RI
Posts: 520
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro2you
how bought we all go up to the inspection station and run open headers and make them **** their pants and run like babies
do you even have headers?
84HOtransam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 04:49 AM   #10
camaro2you
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,530
iTrader: (11)
Hey im gettin there give me a month or so.
camaro2you is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 09:23 AM   #11
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveR
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
new jersey doesnt have to adopt the 95db limit. it is already part of federal highway law. so you have to meet 95db on any road that was in any part paid for with federal money, which is every road everywhere in the country.
this is more a formality than anything.

later
tim
Actually NJ refuses to adopt some of the federal highway standards and chooses to make some of their own rules which is why there are tolls on 95 which is an interstate federally funded road. The government refuses to pay any financial support to states that don't adopt all of the federal standards.
trust me we get financial support...otherwise all of our roads would look like the entrance to island dragway.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 09:31 AM   #12
ar0ck
Resident Camera Guy
 
ar0ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 10,971
iTrader: (2)
Social Networks:

Hey, all I know is my exhaust as it is, is "50 State Legal" and last time I read my government books, federal superseeds state & local law.
__________________
ar0ck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 09:40 AM   #13
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransAm4Life
Hey, all I know is my exhaust as it is, is "50 State Legal" and last time I read my government books, federal superseeds state & local law.
i think thats only for emissions
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 09:40 AM   #14
SteveR
I <3 sheep
 
SteveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by foff667
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveR
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
new jersey doesnt have to adopt the 95db limit. it is already part of federal highway law. so you have to meet 95db on any road that was in any part paid for with federal money, which is every road everywhere in the country.
this is more a formality than anything.

later
tim
Actually NJ refuses to adopt some of the federal highway standards and chooses to make some of their own rules which is why there are tolls on 95 which is an interstate federally funded road. The government refuses to pay any financial support to states that don't adopt all of the federal standards.
trust me we get financial support...otherwise all of our roads would look like the entrance to island dragway.
It's on a road by road basis. We get nothing for 95 because at first NJ wouldn't adopt the federal speed limit for interstate roads, now that NJ has tolls on a federal road, the governemnt won't assist in any way for the maintenance of 95.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
Steve has a thing for sheep....
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
SteveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 11:30 AM   #15
Slow Z
11 Second Club
 
Slow Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 587
iTrader: (1)
I got no problem with them passing such a law as long as they do the same for motorcycles.
__________________
Slow Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 12:47 AM   #16
curt86iroc
 
curt86iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: nj/pa
Posts: 273
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow Z
I got no problem with them passing such a law as long as they do the same for motorcycles.
thats actually the main factor behind this law. open pipes on 1200's, though it sounds amazing, is damn loud. plus, it doesnt help when riders blip the throttle while going through crowded/populated areas.
__________________
1990 IROC-Z - L98 G92 and some go fast goodies
1999 Blazer - ZR2 and some off road goodies
curt86iroc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.