Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2008, 03:28 PM   #1
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Porsche Says BS to GT-R times..And Proves It

There’s something very puzzling about Nissan’s all-new GT-R supercar. Its official output figures read 480hp (358kW) and 588Nm (434lb-ft) of torque and its mass registers at 1,723kg, but the car can still outrun the 911 Turbo around the notorious Nurburgring by a healthy margin despite the Porsche weighing less and producing more torque (1633kg and 457lb-ft respectively).

Nissan’s official lap time for the Nurburgring is a blistering 7m 29s, set back in May. The lap times were for a stock-standard base specification GT-R fitted with the same Japanese market tires as the cars in showrooms, according to claims by Nissan.

Porsche, however, claims Nissan falsified these numbers and posted the quicker times because of semi-slick race-style tires. The German sports carmaker even purchased its own GT-R and set about testing it against both the 911 Turbo and GT2 and in both cases it claims the GT-R was the slowest. The laps were run by one of Porsche’s chassis development engineers and not its regular tester, former world rally champion and race winner Walter Rohrl.

Speaking with Australia’s CarsGuide this week, Porsche’s 911 product chief August Achleitner said the GT-R used by Nissan to post its official times could not have been a regular series production car.

He said Porsche took a standard GT-R bought in the United States and running on regular road tires, and was tested on the same day as the pair of 911s. According to Porsche, the GT-R posted a time of 7m 54s, with the 911 Turbo managing 7m 38s and the GT2 getting down to 7m 34s.



I dont have the link, im at work and cant copy the url.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 03:50 PM   #2
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

What site did you find that on? I'll find and post the URL.

And I'm sure there will be plenty of people crying foul because it was a Porsche employee driving the GT-R in their tests.

I did find this: http://carsguide.news.com.au/site/mo...t_nurburgring/

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 03:51 PM   #3
slugger27nj
 
slugger27nj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 714
iTrader: (0)
Here it is:

http://www.motorauthority.com/porsch...lap-times.html
__________________
Steve
2005 C6 Corvette, M6
2014 Silverado Z71

www.njboxerrescue.com
www.fassasfriendsboxerrescue.com
www.awarenessday.org
slugger27nj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 03:53 PM   #4
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,368
iTrader: (12)
those bastards. wonder where this will go.
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 04:50 PM   #5
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Thanks Steve.
Yeah, Porsche was sick and tired of the 911 Turbo bashing.
So if this is true...the Z06 and ZR1 are faster then the GTR.
ZR1 MUCH faster then the GTR. 30 sec faster.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 05:38 PM   #6
SteveR
I <3 sheep
 
SteveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
iTrader: (1)
haha thats funny. I'm sure Nissan will cry about it, but their car is ugly anyway
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
Steve has a thing for sheep....
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
SteveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 05:40 PM   #7
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,082
iTrader: (12)
i saw a real Skyline GTR the other day in paterson, almost crashed my parents minivan as i stared at it in the side mirror. sexy car
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 05:44 PM   #8
12secondv6
Token v6 Guy
 
12secondv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: No longer neon land :(
Posts: 5,703
iTrader: (6)
But, if the porsche employee went quicker in the gtr.... would porsche REALLY admit it is faster?

Come on.... get over it and move on.

I would not buy a car based off lap times.
__________________
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 - 12.079 at 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO - stage 4+ tune and an intake - no times yet
12secondv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:44 PM   #9
69BirdX
12 Second Club
 
69BirdX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Haddon Twp NJ
Posts: 2,213
iTrader: (0)
Both the Zr1 and Viper have better lap, 0-60, and quarter mile times.
________
FREE WATCH XXX

Last edited by 69BirdX; 04-03-2011 at 12:43 AM.
69BirdX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 07:28 PM   #10
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12secondv6 View Post
But, if the porsche employee went quicker in the gtr.... would porsche REALLY admit it is faster?

Come on.... get over it and move on.

I would not buy a car based off lap times.
Porsche would have kept it quite and figured out why. lol

Porsche does employee one of the larger staffs of test drivers you will find, all with experience in the upper reaches of European racing. If anyone's factory test drivers were going to get it all out of a production car, I would put it up to the Porsche guys.

-Tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 07:43 PM   #11
JerzyIroc
 
JerzyIroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 622
iTrader: (0)
ya im sorry but from the first test i read i knew there was something fishy. not to say its not a great car because it is. but its not the porche z06 killer that they're making it out to be. whats even more pathetic is when magazines do a performance test between the gtr and other high end cars, LOOSES in literally every single category yet somehow won the comparison test?
__________________
1987 IROC-Z L98 T tops
sold

2001 Pontiac Grand Am SE V6 (currently for sale PM me for details)

JerzyIroc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:46 PM   #12
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
James, you of all people should know the Germans well.
First off, they were not happy that people keep tagging the GTR as some 911 Turbo beater.
If they did sand bag the GTR, they would be easily picked off by Nissan or any other outside 3rd party testing saying that Porsche is now scared of a lonely Nissan.
Porsche took a big ass leap of faith by buying a GTR and testing it.

The Germans dont do anything without a plan. And had that GTR smoke the hell out of the 911 Turbo or GT2, they would have spent the next 100 days develping a better 911, better then the upcoming one that is much better then the one they just tested the GTR against.
Germans dont just do **** without a procedure. They found out that Nissan is overrated, no surprise there. 300ZX TT anyone?
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:50 PM   #13
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
And to put it into reference...

The CTS-V did .01 slower then the GTR's time done by Porsche.
Camaro SS is closer to the GTR then the GTR is to the ZR1.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 05:56 AM   #14
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
I will have to wait and see what a magazine can do with it before I jump to too many conclusions. Nissan does currently use the highest tech stability control in any passenger vehicle in the world, co-developed with Bosch, just based on that I am betting it isn't slow.

-Tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 06:40 AM   #15
Frosty
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 7,108
iTrader: (1)
...did the article talk about people blowing up the GTR transmissions already?
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS Redline package, ESC Novi 1500 tuned by EFX, Might Mouse wild catch can, GM STB, smoked ZL1 3rd brake light, Xpel XR Black 35% tint all around, Street Scene front splitter, C7 Carbon ZL1 side skirts, Drake Muscle Car Wickerbill spoiler

2010 Infiniti G37x-Moonlight White w/Graphite interior. Stock...for now. Xpel XR Black tint(hey it's a mod lol)
Frosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 08:06 AM   #16
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
They found out that Nissan is overrated, no surprise there. 300ZX TT anyone?
Now I am not anti-foriegn or anti-Japanese in any way but I've never been impressed with any of their cars in stock form- most, if not all of them have been overratted. NSX, S2000, Supra, WRX, 3000GT, 300ZX, 350Z, g35, that whole crowd.

I've never seen a GTR so that isn't on the list...YET.

Last edited by WildBillyT; 10-01-2008 at 08:06 AM.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 09:12 AM   #17
Mulletbird
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fairview/PC hollar, WV
Posts: 240
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT View Post
Now I am not anti-foriegn or anti-Japanese in any way but I've never been impressed with any of their cars in stock form- most, if not all of them have been overratted. NSX, S2000, Supra, WRX, 3000GT, 300ZX, 350Z, g35, that whole crowd.

I've never seen a GTR so that isn't on the list...YET.
Don't get me wrong, lots of those import cars are great in individual areas (datsuns are awesome handling cars, the supra TT has straight line power, 300zx imo looks cool w/ t-tops, wrx and evo are street-versions of rally cars) but none of them have ever excelled across the boards in any way like a z06 vette or porsche 911gt does. Even their super cars (rx7, nsx, 3000gt, gtr) have never kept up with the competition in terms of street cars - now, with modifications, like anything (i.e. geo w/ gnx motor) they can be fast, and "anything's possible" but in terms of stock, def. agree.
Mulletbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 02:44 PM   #18
Jersey_TA
10 Second Club
 
Jersey_TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eastampton
Posts: 4,466
iTrader: (0)
OH SNAP!!!!
__________________
1999 MBM T/A - the new ride
2004 CE Corvette - 1.410 - 10.246 @ 133.39
2003 Silverado - Lifted 6 on 35s
2000 T/A WS6 - 11.190 @ 119.79...SOLD
Jersey_TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 03:11 PM   #19
trashman01
15 Second Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beaufort SC
Posts: 1,165
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
J They found out that Nissan is overrated, no surprise there. 300ZX TT anyone?
not to mention they are a bitch to work on
__________________
2005 Colorado Z71 - Supermod tuned, SuperSparkz, Resonator delete, SuperMod PTB

next up - 3" lift, Gutted cat/retune/muffler

Past Toys:
1983 Trans AM, 1988 Trans AM, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Off-Road, 1986 Camaro IROC, 1984 Chevy K10 lifted, 1988 Mustang GT, 2006 Silverado 2500HD
trashman01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 04:13 PM   #20
Knipps
 
Knipps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
iTrader: (8)
http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/Ar...ID=57410&vf=12

Update..

Quote:
Nissan has hit back at suspicions raised by Porsche this week that the record Nurburgring lap time set by the GT-R supercar was achieved in anything other than a standard showroom-specification car.

The matter has reached top brass at Nissan, with its European spokesman at the Paris motor show today confirming the matter has gone ''quite high'' up in the company.

A senior Porsche engineer, August Achleitner, who supervises the development of all 911 sports cars, sparked controversy when he told Australian journalists at the launch of the new 911 Targa in Verona, Italy, this week that they were unable to replicate the record 7 minute 29 second lap time that Nissan claimed the GT-R set in April.

In the hands of a Porsche chassis engineer, the GT-R was 20 seconds slower than a 911 GT2 and 16 seconds slower than a Porsche 911 Turbo.

Achleitner questioned whether the GT-R was running a standard set-up on road tyres or perhaps something more track-oriented.

“Quite simply we're not going to get into a war of words with Porsche,” said Nissan's European spokesman Neil Reeve. “The final word from us is that it was done on absolutely standard tyres which are available to customers in the showroom.They're not trick tyres – absolutely standard tyres, normal road tyres.

“The GT-R comes with Bridgestone and Goodyear (Dunlop). One tyre gives slightly better times around the 'Ring.

“We did it on Dunlop. They're available with the car,” he said.

He was at a loss to explain the disparity over the lap time differences.

“I don't know, honestly I can't explain. I don't think it's for us to explain how they didn't match our time,” Mr Reeve said.

“We absolutely maintain (that) Tochio Suzuki - the chief test driver on the GT-R program pounded thousands of laps - he got to know every inch of Nurburgring (circuit) and how the car performs on the Nurburgring and hence set that fabulous lap. More than that, I can't speculate. I can't explain why they couldn't match the time.”

“We maintain that ... nothing special was done to the car.”

He conceded that the controversy might play on the minds of potential GT-R buyers. Fast lap times of the famous 21-kilometre German circuit are increasingy being used by car companies for bragging rights over performance and engineering prowess.

“The people who'd buy a GT-R or 911 Turbo are not the type of people to make a purchase like that lightly. They going to do an incredible amount of research, they're going to read every single road test that's available in every magazine which is on the internet and they're going to draw their own conclusion. Will it put doubt in their mind? They might find it surprising. In our experience in Europe, the GT-R has widely matched, at least, if not beaten, the 911 Turbo on various track tests. They can draw their own conclusions.

“We think its performance speaks for itself,'' he said.

Reeve wouldn't rule out the possibility of a rematch for the world to see.

“We're considering our options. We're not saying more than that,” he said.

“This (Porsche's questioning of Nissan's claim) happened two days ago, it was a surprising thing to read in the press, it's important.

“But let's not blow it out of all proportion. We're not crying about it. We're not going to sook about it.

“I'm cheeky enough to say it's flattering that Porsche have bought themselves a GT-R and flown it to Germany, they want to try it. I guess that's some kind of stamp of approval.

“It's great to have the competition. We're absolutely proud of the GT-R. It's a fabulous sports car, really epic.

“The level of performance that it delivers is really so impressive for the price it's positioned at,” he said.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
dumbass.
Knipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 04:27 PM   #21
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Yeah, that reeks of BS. One set of street tires magically knocking off nearly half a second over another? Yeah right, maybe if it was from a regular tire to a DOT race tire.

I bet everyone that bought one of those cars for it's performance is seriously starting to question what they were sold.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 04:45 PM   #22
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
HAHA Nissan is scared of porshe...and they damn well should be...
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 05:20 PM   #23
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
I don't think Nissan really has nothing to fear from Porsche. Both companies have amazing racing histories and both will continue. This is truely Nissan's first trip into the realm of the realm of super car performance though. It doesn't look like it is turning out the way they wanted it to be or appear. Hopefully they will learn from it and turn out a real supercar that isn't butt ugly next time.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.