 |
07-31-2010, 09:13 PM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Passing emissions with an engine swap
What involved? The catch here is I'll be repowering an s10 from a 4.3 to a 6.2L Detroit diesel.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 09:20 PM
|
#2
|
11 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 4,620
|
As long as its newer.....
__________________
1999 Z28 Convertible. 6 speed swap, wide cowl hood, full hockey stripes, and a whining 10 bolt.
2008 Sierra Vortec Max. 6.2 swapped, headers, Magnaflow catback, GMPP CAI, NHT optioned tow package.
2006 GTO, 11.48 @ 118.3
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 09:25 PM
|
#3
|
Power Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milford NJ
Posts: 1,526
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Torque
As long as its newer.....
|
not true, must be same year or newer, and a stock configuration for the vehicle. The diesel swap will never be "legal" in a s10, because the s10 never came with a diesel
however, since NJ will be doing away with everything but tail pipe, if you can get it to pass tail pipe somehow, maybe you can slip by?
Last edited by //<86TA>\\; 07-31-2010 at 09:26 PM.
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 09:45 PM
|
#4
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,082
|
but if its an OBDII s10, itll be more complicated than a probe in the tail pipe.
youll have to look into all the specific regulations and laws to see what you have to do.
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 09:19 AM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: freehold nj
Posts: 171
|
doesnt nj have a separate inspection for modified vehicles? i heard something about it last year. it does seem a lil backwards that you would need to pass for the vehicle and not the engine though imo. however diesel's are better that gas. as long as you can get the sensors to read, you should be ok
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 09:49 AM
|
#6
|
12 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford
Posts: 8,373
|
there was an S10 deseil back in the early 90's
__________________
88 Camaro
95 Impala SS
97 Trans Am WS6
98 Blazer ZR2
00 Corvette
04 CTS-V
04 Grand Cherokee
06 GMC Sierra
07 Sublime Charger Daytona
12 Tahoe LT
17 Malibu LT
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 10:21 AM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 819
|
The s10 was powered by an Isuzu diesel at one point. However, since your specific vehicle came from the factory powered by gasoline I think its different. I don't think its a truly "legal" swap.
If you talk to some private inspection facilities, they may just hook it up to the sniffer and ignore the diesel knock and not look under the hood. I would imagine you could get it to pass emissions. I don't really see anything wrong with it as long as it meets the standards of that vehicle, but I don't think the state feels the same way.
What year truck is it? If its an '85 or older you could look at a classic registration. But I think the DMV played with the rules on 'historic' QQ registrations
__________________
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 11:38 AM
|
#8
|
Meet Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,368
|
diesel emissions won't pass a gas sniff test
i'd jump through hoops on the mvc hotline, 1-800-bendover
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 11:58 AM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Well I got some more info on this.
From what I've been told NJ doesnt emission test diesels under 16,000lbs. So I would have to do whatever paper work required to get the vehicle marked as repowered and then would be exempt.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 02:20 PM
|
#10
|
15 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beaufort SC
Posts: 1,165
|
just wondering one thing, why the diesel swap? and at that a 6.2?
__________________
2005 Colorado Z71 - Supermod tuned, SuperSparkz, Resonator delete, SuperMod PTB
next up - 3" lift, Gutted cat/retune/muffler
Past Toys:
1983 Trans AM, 1988 Trans AM, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Off-Road, 1986 Camaro IROC, 1984 Chevy K10 lifted, 1988 Mustang GT, 2006 Silverado 2500HD
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 03:50 PM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider
diesel emissions won't pass a gas sniff test
i'd jump through hoops on the mvc hotline, 1-800-bendover
|
Diesels emit less hydrocarbons and CO2 than a gasoline engine, while emitting more NOx gasses. I remember my last private inspection NOx gasses were not measured, only CO2 and HC. You may be right in that the 6.2 may not run very clean. I don't know much about them, emissions wise.
__________________
Last edited by 91chevywt; 08-01-2010 at 03:51 PM.
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 03:54 PM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Diesel swap because I've never had a diesel before and happen to like them.
Mileage, fuel range, grunt for moving big tires, no offcamber/hill issues offroad like carbs and 1 wire to run it.
6.2 because theyre cheap, are a very misunderstood but reliable motor, and will do what I need just fine.
I would love to toss a 4bt in this truck but the hype around Cummins drives the prices up so bad its ridiculous. A core more is $800. I could get a low miles 6.2 for $300-400, do headgaskets and head studs for reliability, water pump and timing gears and have a whopping $800 said and done into my motor.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 05:45 PM
|
#13
|
15 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beaufort SC
Posts: 1,165
|
the the fuel mileage is a joke, my buddy only gets 18 on the highway wit his and 15 around town, they can go 500 miles because most diesel trucks have 40 gallon tanks
but if you want a diesel, save yourself alot of headaches and just buy a early to mid 90s 2500/3500 truck, i agree the detroit is a better motor then the izuzu but its like a LSX swap in a 4th gen LT1 car, yea you can do it to be different but its cheaper and easier to by a LS1 car
__________________
2005 Colorado Z71 - Supermod tuned, SuperSparkz, Resonator delete, SuperMod PTB
next up - 3" lift, Gutted cat/retune/muffler
Past Toys:
1983 Trans AM, 1988 Trans AM, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Off-Road, 1986 Camaro IROC, 1984 Chevy K10 lifted, 1988 Mustang GT, 2006 Silverado 2500HD
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 08:48 PM
|
#14
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trashman01
the the fuel mileage is a joke, my buddy only gets 18 on the highway wit his and 15 around town, they can go 500 miles because most diesel trucks have 40 gallon tanks
but if you want a diesel, save yourself alot of headaches and just buy a early to mid 90s 2500/3500 truck, i agree the detroit is a better motor then the izuzu but its like a LSX swap in a 4th gen LT1 car, yea you can do it to be different but its cheaper and easier to by a LS1 car
|
Except I dont want a fullsize truck. Plus the 6.2 is a cheap swap. Theres nothing expensive about it. No harness, no ECU, no huge drivetrain changes (not that I wasnt doing that anyway).
Fuel mileage is no joke either. With a J code manifold with EGR delete and a timing chain thats not loose 6.2s can pull 20-30 mpg depending on driving condition.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
08-02-2010, 07:16 PM
|
#15
|
15 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beaufort SC
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by r0nin89
Except I dont want a fullsize truck. Plus the 6.2 is a cheap swap. Theres nothing expensive about it. No harness, no ECU, no huge drivetrain changes (not that I wasnt doing that anyway).
Fuel mileage is no joke either. With a J code manifold with EGR delete and a timing chain thats not loose 6.2s can pull 20-30 mpg depending on driving condition.
|
i doubt a 6.2L is gonna bolt up to a v6/I4 tranny(dont kno which you have), there is some wiring and ecu control, esp in a GM(has been since the late 70s? i think) the fuel system is going to ahve to change, you need a lift pump, the wiring and the fuel block(should be part of the motor) yes diesel run on compression and not spark, i beleive the 6.2ls used a glow plug might be a toaster element, something to heat the air or fuel mixture when its below 40*F. if you can do it right and cheap, go for it, i wanna see stacks on that bitch tho
__________________
2005 Colorado Z71 - Supermod tuned, SuperSparkz, Resonator delete, SuperMod PTB
next up - 3" lift, Gutted cat/retune/muffler
Past Toys:
1983 Trans AM, 1988 Trans AM, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Off-Road, 1986 Camaro IROC, 1984 Chevy K10 lifted, 1988 Mustang GT, 2006 Silverado 2500HD
|
|
|
08-02-2010, 09:17 PM
|
#16
|
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton Twp, NJ
Posts: 855
|
What's the front axle rated for in the S10. I don't know much about the 6.2L's, but you might be seriously overloading the front suspension and braking capabilities of that truck, to the point where its dangerous. I don't know, but if the 6.2L is anything like a Cummins 5.9L from standpoint of weight, look out below.........
Interesting swap though. And I do know people that have gotten very very good mileage (mid 20's on the highway) with the 6.2L, but they generally don't make much grunt. My 5.9L will do low 20's on the highway no problem and on a long trip can pull 23-24 unloaded open road and still pull your house off its foundation.
Looking quick the fully dressed weight of a 6.2L is about 725lbs +/-, a fully dressed SBC (iron head/intake) tips the scales at 550-600lbs +/-. That's pretty big jump and doesn't include rad upgrades, hydro-boost for steering and brakes etc etc. The front end of that truck is going to be asked to shoulder pretty hefty load? Any kits out there to address this?
If you are gonna run stacks, this is how you run stacks.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoOrSuJFG4c
How fast do you think the locals would pull you over for that behavior?
Caution you might have some redneck in ya if you watch this more than once:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Krqt_w6NSJM
__________________
1999 Formula 6spd (The driver)
1997 2500 Ext. Cab Dodge 4x4 CTD 5spd (The Earth Mover)
1970 Nova 5spd (The toy)
Last edited by 1QWIKBIRD; 08-02-2010 at 09:41 PM.
|
|
|
08-02-2010, 10:06 PM
|
#17
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 819
|
I personally think the 6.2 would be better off in a full size truck. A regular cab longbed chevy with the 6.2 really isn't that big of a truck. Not even that heavy either. The chasis is better suited for that engine as well. Pulling trailers, doing work.
You mentioned you've never had a diesel, maybe it would be good to get into a full size and determine if you'd really want to swap it into an s10. I'm not going to lie, the thought has crossed my mind. But the S10 chasis just isn't suitable for the work those diesels can do
__________________
|
|
|
08-02-2010, 10:35 PM
|
#18
|
Co-Founder / Site Admin
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
|
Knowing the OP, I would imagine that the stock suspension will be long gone in this truck. It will likely be lifted and spend all / most of it's time in the woods. Am I right Vinnie?
- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?
|
|
|
08-03-2010, 08:30 AM
|
#19
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wantage, NJ
Posts: 693
|
Quote:
Knowing the OP, I would imagine that the stock suspension will be long gone in this truck. It will likely be lifted and spend all / most of it's time in the woods.
|
^This. Especially with the "can handle off camber angles" comment.
I've heard all sorts of negativity about those 6.2s, but I can remember my buddy had one when we were in H.S. His father was (Still is, I think) a GM dealership mechanic and swore by diesels, and I can remember that he scoured the state looking for his truck. He loved that thing, and raved about the mileage and power. It definitely smoked more than the modern diesels, and was louder as well, but very reliable. I'm interested to see this happen.
|
|
|
08-03-2010, 08:43 AM
|
#20
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 819
|
All this talk about GM diesels has got me kinda interested in them lol I might have to play around with one some time. Does the 6.2 have the injection pump problems the newer GM diesels had? I don't know too too much about them, I just know my friend was changing them every 70k in school vans, and I personally got stuck due to a bad injection pump in 11th grade up in Massachusetts, so I never had much favor towards them.
__________________
|
|
|
08-03-2010, 09:21 AM
|
#21
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Lol Justin is right. You guys are just being silly. Stock front end HA. The only thing Justin got wrong is that this isnt going to be just a woods truck. Its gonna be built with street comfort in mind for camping trips and medium duty wheeling. It will have detachable swaybars for street handling on road.
The truck will be solid front axle on leaf springs. v6 toyota axles front and rear with chromoly shafts. Stronger ratings then the dana 44/10bolt front that came under the fullsize 3/4ton with the 6.2
Transmission will be a later model nv3500 with a full size 241 with a rear slipyoke eliminator running cv shafts front and rear.
Front of the frame will be boxed not that I dont doubt the s10 frame could handle it stock but just for assurance. The 6.2 weighs the same amount as a big block which theres plenty of s10s running around with BBC in them.
As far as a fullsize. I have a fullsize right now. And yes it is bigger when you get in the woods, much bigger.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
08-03-2010, 08:38 PM
|
#22
|
15 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beaufort SC
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1QWIKBIRD
|
1) eh thats for the hardcore racing diesels, if its a street/off-road truck, dual stacks, up the outside of the bed behind the cab, but have the bed notched so the stacks arent sticking out past the cab
2) so just cause i watched it 100 times, im a redneck?
__________________
2005 Colorado Z71 - Supermod tuned, SuperSparkz, Resonator delete, SuperMod PTB
next up - 3" lift, Gutted cat/retune/muffler
Past Toys:
1983 Trans AM, 1988 Trans AM, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Off-Road, 1986 Camaro IROC, 1984 Chevy K10 lifted, 1988 Mustang GT, 2006 Silverado 2500HD
|
|
|
08-04-2010, 10:28 AM
|
#23
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trashman01
1) eh thats for the hardcore racing diesels, if its a street/off-road truck, dual stacks, up the outside of the bed behind the cab, but have the bed notched so the stacks arent sticking out past the cab
2) so just cause i watched it 100 times, im a redneck? 
|
No stacks its gonna be a blazer and even then no stacks. Single 4in pipe dump out the back.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
08-04-2010, 06:34 PM
|
#24
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 08:51 AM
|
#25
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Nice. I know theres a c4 floating around somewhere with a 6.5TD stuffed under the hood.
That thing is redneck as hell but it looks like it was done rather well honestly.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|