Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2007, 01:58 PM   #1
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
Stupid ECM idea

This may be a knucklehead thought, but I’ve seen the threads on problems tuning (some?) LT1s, and I’ve seen where some guys have LT1 intakes modded to bolt to SBC with an HEI. So maybe you guys with more experience than I at this (esp Mr HPT guy) could tell me if this is a stupid idea.

Could you adapt an LS1 ECM to any of these applications and tune it with the HPT (or similar) software? Or is there some crazy technical hurdle, like maybe the reluctor ring?

Just a lunchtime thought…

Edit: Yes, I know the harness issue would be a PITA.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop

Last edited by BonzoHansen; 05-02-2007 at 03:45 PM.
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 07:06 PM   #2
Ian
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
iTrader: (7)
LS1's use a crankshaft position sensor and a camshaft position sensor to control the timing, LT1's have a distributor.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434 View Post
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 07:38 PM   #3
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
Dude you can use the same computer stystem i'm using for my 3.4...Its called Megasquirt and you can tune it to what ever spec you want for any engine.
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 08:51 PM   #4
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
the harness shoudl be simple in theory. GM uses generic sensors and conectors, so all you would have to do is move a few wires around and you would be set. to wire in crank posisiton you can use an inexpessive flying magnet style pick up, similar to what MSD sells for use with their digital systems.
cam position would be a tough call because of location. on an older SBC it wouldn't be too tough since most of the flying magnet systems and fairly slim. on an LTx engine you have far less clearance even if you remove the opti.
i don't see how it would be necessary to use both cam and crank, since ignition lead is based on the timing of the piston before TDC and that is crank position related.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 02:33 PM   #5
Pampered-Z
Sliderule / Moderator
 
Pampered-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
iTrader: (1)
knucklehead!

Just kidding skippy! It just not simple. The LT1 / Opti is easy enougn to program out the signal that a conventional distributor can be used. But when they do that they still retain the opti for the cam signal.

The opti has two functions: The optical part is the cam position sensor (the low Res side) which tells the ECM which individual injector to fire ( except 93s that are batch fire - another issue ) and the other function is the spark distribution (High RES). The high Res is the root of the evil of the opti. How long does a conventonal cap and rotor last? Well that is how long a Opti cap and rotor is going to last! Could be 20,000 miles, could last 200,000 miles.

If you replace the distributor part of of the opti with a conventional distributor or remore/direct spark coil pack then the opti will most likely last allot longer. The sparking within the unit results in some heat (and later condences) and Ozone that eventually can corrode the optical portion. This is why later models are vented, it's a bandaid, not a cureall. The cure was to eliminate the opti completely.

To swap a LS1 ECM into a LT1 car would require some way to convert the cam signal such as how the Deltech or Electromotive system does. It is a bit more involved then just the harnness and ECM. The LS1 ECM will require data as to which cyclinder to spark.

As far as the tuning, both are basically the same other then the software used. The problem with LT1 tuning is that there are less people that do good work locally so they use mail order which is far less quality then having someone like Bill working real time on a LS1 car.

LS1/LT1 tuning isn't really a problem with the EMC. The big advantage of the LS1 ECM is that it can handle high RPMs. An LT1 computer simply locks up before 8,000RPMs. But if you've invested the money to spin that high your going to go with a Motech, Gen7 other other type unit that has far more flexabilty. Plus that high an RPM will kill an opti, there seems to be allot of folks that have had them self destruct when pushed near 7,000RPMs. Couple we found had a drive pin too long, but I think the stockers just weren't designed to handle much over 6,500.

here is what's on the inside of an Opti:

http://www.charm.net/~mchaney/optisprk/optisprk.htm


My solution was to use an aftermarket ECM, Coil packs, Crank pistion sensor, and a conventional type mount distributor that is just a sensor for cam postion. This will completely eliminate the opti. I purchased everything, just never got around to installing it and found the stock ECM can actually handle what i need ( for now! )
JB
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada

1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!

Last edited by Pampered-Z; 05-03-2007 at 02:36 PM.
Pampered-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 04:04 PM   #6
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
Megasquirt is MUCH easier
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 05:11 PM   #7
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubba428 View Post
Megasquirt is MUCH easier
How many times are you planning on posting that in the same thread?

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 05:58 PM   #8
Knipps
 
Knipps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
How many times are you planning on posting that in the same thread?

- Justin
looks like as many times as someone else mentions something different
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
dumbass.
Knipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 06:10 PM   #9
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
or untill he relises its more flexible than a stock ecm could ever be
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 06:13 PM   #10
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
megasquirt = overpriced adn under performing. it has fewer parameters and is a lower resolution system than the factory GM computers. the only reason it is so much easier to use is because it can't do as much.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 06:21 PM   #11
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
the system i ordered contols everything AFR spark timing you name it its MS1 Vs3.0. you must be talking about version 1 or 2.2
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 12:32 PM   #12
jwscab
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
iTrader: (0)
there is a ton of info on thirdgen.org regarding ecm swaps, in particular, running the vortec engines with an LS1 ecm. The LT1 engine uses the same type of crankshaft position sensor, so if you were to rework the intake to use a vortec distributor or retrofit a regular dist for a cam position sensor, its somewhat straight forward. look for a thread entitled 'obdii tpi' or something like that. The LS1 pcm (I guess; its part number '411, the right pcm) was used in express chevy vans with the old style vortec SBC.

there are tons of options out there....it really depends on your skill level and how hard you want to make something different.

personally, I think its a crock what these software places charge for OBDii tuning software with 'credits' and 'vin locks' and all the other bullcrap so I would still use OBDi where possible and any freeware or 'reasonably priced' software.....
jwscab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.