Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2007, 11:37 AM   #1
LS1Hawk
 
LS1Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,308
iTrader: (0)
Is 2nd death of the muscle car upon us?

How New MPG Standards
Could Crimp Your Ride


Wall Street Journal - 12/3/07

The vehicles Americans drive got steadily bigger, faster and less fuel efficient for more than two decades, thanks to cheap oil and Washington's hands-off approach to regulation. If Congress passes the energy bill it is now considering, that trend would be jammed into reverse.

The deal brokered by top Democrats late Friday to boost average new vehicle fuel economy to 35 miles per gallon by 2020 means that American cars will get smaller, and possibly more expensive....

Emphasis on 0 to 60 performance, big engines and large horsepower numbers will decrease. The balance will tilt toward improving mileage .... Powerful sports cars like Ford's popular Mustang could become endangered, economic-forecasting firm Global Insight says, though exactly how auto makers will recalibrate their product mix remained unclear.

Full Article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1196...googlenews_wsj
__________________
John

Last edited by LS1Hawk; 12-03-2007 at 12:05 PM.
LS1Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 11:44 AM   #2
Anti_Rice_Guy
The Mayor / 2009 Member of the Year / Moderator
 
Anti_Rice_Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northwest
Posts: 8,869
iTrader: (1)
Social Networks:

I believe NJ already passed or is considering a bill similar to this? It definitely sucks though. But the performance hybrids I think show promise, plus aerodynamics and lightweight materials like carbon fiber will help us to allow a combo of mileage and performance. At least that is my hope.
__________________
1995 Z28 Convertible A4 13.78 @ 100 (CAI, high flow cat, catback, 160 thermo, hypertech, Strano springs, Koni yellows, sway bars, 3 pt. UMI SFC)
2018 Sea Doo GTX - 3 cylinders and das boooooost
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Is English your 2nd language? Did you graduate high school? Your posts make my head hurt.
Team FARM
Anti_Rice_Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 11:59 AM   #3
Knipps
 
Knipps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1Hawk View Post
The deal brokered by top Democrats late Friday to boost average new vehicle fuel economy to 35 miles per gallon by 2020 means that American cars will get smaller, and possibly more expensive...
so we're going to make them more efficient but also make it harder to afford
aka the less efficient vehicles will be on the road longer
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
dumbass.
Knipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 04:31 PM   #4
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
505 hp Z06 is rated at 29mpg highway(which is the base the standard is applied to). i don't see a new average MPG standard in 12 years bothering the industry too much.
it is also an average across all new vehicles sold, not every new vehicle. so for every two 38mpg aveos GM sells they can sell a Z06 and still meet the standard
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 06:29 PM   #5
NumberTwo
13 Second Club
 
NumberTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Old Bridge
Posts: 194
iTrader: (0)
Im sure there will be some associated tax at purchare or registration time for vehicles that dont meet the requirements. IIRC the Father in law paid a 5K "Gas Guzzler" tax or some BS on his 07 Denali when he bought it a few months ago.
NumberTwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 06:37 PM   #6
AliWantsNss
 
AliWantsNss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 267
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NumberTwo View Post
Im sure there will be some associated tax at purchare or registration time for vehicles that dont meet the requirements. IIRC the Father in law paid a 5K "Gas Guzzler" tax or some BS on his 07 Denali when he bought it a few months ago.
In NJ the Denali does not get that much of a gas guzzler tax from the state. It is .025% for vehicles that fail to get an avg MPG of 19.
__________________
2002 Z28 M6 maroon
Go fast parts
11.1 @ 123

2011 Buick Regal Turbo
AliWantsNss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 06:38 PM   #7
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
To be quite honest, the average car has too much power, tires that are too wide (rolling resistence) and too much weight. Cut them all a bit and you are getting close. With current transmissions and engine controls we are almost there.

Hell, with modern torque manangement they only have 400hp at WOT anyway. It is nothing like 400hp of the old days. The average soccer mom could no way handle it.

And too many people drive vehicles that are too big (suvs, etc.).

IMO if you really want to push up mileage, CAFE shoud be abolished and replaced with a gas tax or something. I think the dems are repeating the sins of the past instead of recognizing it's previous failure.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 06:59 PM   #8
NightRydaSS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 513
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
To be quite honest, the average car has too much power, tires that are too wide (rolling resistence) and too much weight. Cut them all a bit and you are getting close. With current transmissions and engine controls we are almost there.

Hell, with modern torque manangement they only have 400hp at WOT anyway. It is nothing like 400hp of the old days. The average soccer mom could no way handle it.

And too many people drive vehicles that are too big (suvs, etc.).

IMO if you really want to push up mileage, CAFE shoud be abolished and replaced with a gas tax or something. I think the dems are repeating the sins of the past instead of recognizing it's previous failure.

u kno, i was just think the same thing a few days ago. i was wondering if "old school" HP was/is the same as "new school"? i mean there are A LOT of cars w/ 350+HP out now, and they seem very "domesticated". Like BMW 4 door cars, Benz's, ect... You also see a lot of mid 40 early 50 "divorce" women driving them and some men. Ppl who you can look at and tell they never owned or even beeen in a sports car before. To me there was no way they could handle the power if it were "true" HP.
__________________
The only place "stock" belongs is on store shelves; tweak that b*tch!!!

Eff Dr. Phil; my M6 SS is the only Therapist I need!

Light travels faster then sound; that is why some people appear to be smart until they speak - Unknown
NightRydaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 07:08 PM   #9
SteveR
I <3 sheep
 
SteveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AliWantsNss View Post
In NJ the Denali does not get that much of a gas guzzler tax from the state. It is .025% for vehicles that fail to get an avg MPG of 19.
Theres a $1000 gas guzzler tax on the Shelby GT Mustang that gets 24mpg. WTF is that about.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
Steve has a thing for sheep....
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
SteveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 07:10 PM   #10
NightRydaSS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 513
iTrader: (0)
besides, you can't sell what ppl dont want. The market drives production, why do you think there has been a jump in sport cars over the last decade and a half. Every manufacture has some sort of sports car now (Honda S2000???). The comes from a manufacture who was/is known for L.E.V and U.L.E.V cars. BMW has the lower end 3 series with a TT 300HP 335i, Mercedes jumped over the mountain with thier AMG cars. GM's not dumb, they squeezed out the Cobalt w/ a S/C on it. the Esclade has a 6.2L in it...CTS-V anyone??? Grandpop and grandma will NEVER miss the early bird special now.

They made these cars b/c that is what ppl want. i think that is what makes America, "America". Big SUV's, Lifted Pick-ups, and loud / crazy fast sports cars.

Now true, if they stop producing these cars ppl will have no choice but to buy them, but, don't forget about the aftermarket performance. Ppl will soop these things up as much as they can (look at ricers, 300HP Civic???). Which in turn will bring us right back to where we r now.

i dunno, politicians need to stop blowing their load every 2 seconds on every issue.
__________________
The only place "stock" belongs is on store shelves; tweak that b*tch!!!

Eff Dr. Phil; my M6 SS is the only Therapist I need!

Light travels faster then sound; that is why some people appear to be smart until they speak - Unknown
NightRydaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 07:23 PM   #11
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightRydaSS View Post
besides, you can't sell what ppl dont want. The market drives production
That is exactly why CAFE should die. Been there, done that, failed. If gas cost more then the market would demand change.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 08:40 PM   #12
NumberTwo
13 Second Club
 
NumberTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Old Bridge
Posts: 194
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AliWantsNss View Post
In NJ the Denali does not get that much of a gas guzzler tax from the state. It is .025% for vehicles that fail to get an avg MPG of 19.
Yeah, I was wrong. Dont know what made me think of the 5K price tag. Its .4% on cars that dont get 19 MPG or better, or cars that sell for 45K or more. He falls into both categories lol
NumberTwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 09:14 PM   #13
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveR View Post
Theres a $1000 gas guzzler tax on the Shelby GT Mustang that gets 24mpg. WTF is that about.
there is a sliding scale for gas guzzler taxes on anything under 26mpg highway i believe. the worse the mileage the higher the percentage. the only saving grace of this is that it tends to charge those who can afford mega yacht yuppie SUV's and leave is common citizens alone. finally, a tax being paid by those who can afford it
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 06:27 AM   #14
LS1Hawk
 
LS1Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,308
iTrader: (0)
SUVs don't get a gas guzzler tax because they're classified as "light trucks." Which is total bs, because an auto Vette or GTO gets much better mpg, but they get slapped with the tax.
__________________
John
LS1Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:36 AM   #15
Mike
BadMod
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
iTrader: (17)
by the time that goes into effect all the gm high-performance v8 cars will have displacement on demand and get good enough gas mileage
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva View Post
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 08:04 AM   #16
NightRydaSS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 513
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
That is exactly why CAFE should die. Been there, done that, failed. If gas cost more then the market would demand change.
what is CAFE??

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1Hawk View Post
SUVs don't get a gas guzzler tax because they're classified as "light trucks." Which is total bs, because an auto Vette or GTO gets much better mpg, but they get slapped with the tax.
More reason to drive a stick biotch!!!
__________________
The only place "stock" belongs is on store shelves; tweak that b*tch!!!

Eff Dr. Phil; my M6 SS is the only Therapist I need!

Light travels faster then sound; that is why some people appear to be smart until they speak - Unknown
NightRydaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 08:52 AM   #17
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

the SUV thing is out of control. i see old ladys driving V8 SUVs and i'm making due towing with my Vue. if you need the room, get a minivan. i felt the horror watching a lady take a year to get into a spot with a expedition and wouldn't let anyone pass. i wanted to poke myself in the eye
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 09:02 AM   #18
SteveR
I <3 sheep
 
SteveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1Hawk View Post
SUVs don't get a gas guzzler tax because they're classified as "light trucks." Which is total bs, because an auto Vette or GTO gets much better mpg, but they get slapped with the tax.
Yup, I just checked all the Fords and only the Mustang has the tax, which is insane considering a base GT gets 22mpg and has a $1000 gas guzzler tax, and an F-150 crew cab gets 16mpg and is exempt. Oh, and all trucks larger than an F-150, all vans, and all 'commercial trucks' don't even require any type of fuel efficiency rating what so ever. BS.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
Steve has a thing for sheep....
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
SteveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 09:21 AM   #19
sdm1234
 
sdm1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Milford, NJ
Posts: 10
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveR View Post
Yup, I just checked all the Fords and only the Mustang has the tax, which is insane considering a base GT gets 22mpg and has a $1000 gas guzzler tax, and an F-150 crew cab gets 16mpg and is exempt. Oh, and all trucks larger than an F-150, all vans, and all 'commercial trucks' don't even require any type of fuel efficiency rating what so ever. BS.
The F150 doesn't even get 16mpg. It's more like 10-12. And you gotta love those turbo diesel trucks... lol

And for this specific average MPG in 2020, people either dont understand or are completely taking it out of perspective. It's only for the new '20 cars (that was wierd to type lol). I still drive my '78 6.6L TA around which gets 11mpg, and this has lasted 30 yrs so far! We have also have a perfectly good '65 Mustang we run around occasionally. That's 43 yrs old! With this new MPG thing going down, it'll only bring back the muscle cars. You just wait... It will be the return of the pony cars, due to restoration! The way I see it, people will bring the older cars back to life. Cheap, quality cars, cheap parts, cheap HP! Long live the F-Body!
__________________

1997 Trans Am WS.6 M6
275/40ZR17 Falken 451's - TB Bypass - Hurst Billet Plus w/ 6in Stick - CAGS - Various Vinyls - Interior LEDs - PaceSetter Mids - Random Tech. Dual-Cat Y-Pipe - SLP LM1 w/ Flamethrowers through 4in tips - LT4 KM - 1.6 RR's - 160 T-Stat - PCM Tune - 25% U/D & O/D Alt Pulleys - Meziere Elec. WP - Alum DS - Hardened Pushrods - LS1 Front Brakes - Custom Pinstriping - !Sidemolding >>> All My Rides
sdm1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 10:09 AM   #20
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Everybody go ahead and stab me for saying this, but I think it's time for the auto manufacturers to quit it with the new age HP wars and come out with a car something that is cheap, ~250hp, and gets 45+ mpg reliably. Right now I don't care about the power of my daily driver, (hell, I don't think I break 3000RPM going to work) I'd rather it was a lot cheaper to operate. That's where I think the buyers will flock to, given the current oil prices.

Then the aftermarket can be responsible for coming out with hot parts to get pleasure vehicle power up, etc which will help boost that industry.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 10:15 AM   #21
bad64chevelle
I will beat you with a toaster!
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,054
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
And too many people drive vehicles that are too big (suvs, etc.).
HmmmmI guess I fall into that category.

Im proud to say that nothing I own gets over 12MPG...
__________________
___________________
bad64chevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 10:25 AM   #22
Knipps
 
Knipps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT View Post
Everybody go ahead and stab me for saying this, but I think it's time for the auto manufacturers to quit it with the new age HP wars and come out with a car something that is cheap, ~250hp, and gets 45+ mpg reliably. Right now I don't care about the power of my daily driver, (hell, I don't think I break 3000RPM going to work) I'd rather it was a lot cheaper to operate. That's where I think the buyers will flock to, given the current oil prices.

Then the aftermarket can be responsible for coming out with hot parts to get pleasure vehicle power up, etc which will help boost that industry.
why stab you? i agree. there's no need for it
but then again, there's also the group that uses their toy as a DD

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad64chevelle View Post
HmmmmI guess I fall into that category.

Im proud to say that nothing I own gets over 12MPG...
i just wanted to say you have the longest sig ever
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
dumbass.
Knipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 12:32 PM   #23
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT View Post
Everybody go ahead and stab me for saying this, but I think it's time for the auto manufacturers to quit it with the new age HP wars and come out with a car something that is cheap, ~250hp, and gets 45+ mpg reliably. Right now I don't care about the power of my daily driver, (hell, I don't think I break 3000RPM going to work) I'd rather it was a lot cheaper to operate. That's where I think the buyers will flock to, given the current oil prices.

Then the aftermarket can be responsible for coming out with hot parts to get pleasure vehicle power up, etc which will help boost that industry.
Nope, I agree 100% Already said it.

CAFE = corporate average fuel economy. Google it. It is what we are talking about.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 01:29 PM   #24
Iroc-z86
 
Iroc-z86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 929
iTrader: (5)
I agree that the big trucks not getting taxed is bs and how they dont have any pollution control on them. IE diesels do not have any emissions testing, i think safety but thats it.

I think it will be possible to have a decently quick car with good mpgs. my grand prix has a 3.8 v6 and gets avg 25 mpg with city and highway. id say thats really good for such a big car.
__________________
1986 IROC-Z - 305- .030 over, Voodoo cam, 113 vette heads, tpi, hedman torque steps, GMMG 3in catback, custom chip, t56, 3.27s 9 bolt, rest of the car is stock.

2011 Camaro - 2lt/rs red jewel tincoat, m6 - SOLD

2014 Camaro SS - bolt ons

1998 Jimmy - the beater
Iroc-z86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 02:45 PM   #25
NightRydaSS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 513
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Nope, I agree 100% Already said it.

CAFE = corporate average fuel economy. Google it. It is what we are talking about.
i spend too much time Googling my Yahoo as it is; I'd rather just get the answer.
__________________
The only place "stock" belongs is on store shelves; tweak that b*tch!!!

Eff Dr. Phil; my M6 SS is the only Therapist I need!

Light travels faster then sound; that is why some people appear to be smart until they speak - Unknown
NightRydaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.