 |
03-15-2010, 09:50 PM
|
#1
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
|
SS hit the dyno...
...and put down 425rwhp. Not too bad considering im still using stock LS6 heads intake and ported TB. A FAST 92mm intake/TB will be coming this summer.
|
|
|
03-15-2010, 09:53 PM
|
#2
|
12 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,923
|
Good #'s man ! Do you have a copy of the dyno ?
__________________
2016 Lamborghini Huracan LP610-4
2012 Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 Spyder
2013 Nissan GT-R Black Edition
1999 Trans Am WS6
2000 Trans Am WS6
|
|
|
03-15-2010, 09:53 PM
|
#3
|
Power Member/NJFBOA Bookie/Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Jersey = Best Jersey.
Posts: 4,435
|
Mods? for those of us unfamiliar w/ your car?
And on whose dyno?
|
|
|
03-15-2010, 09:54 PM
|
#4
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
|
yup its in my SKY out in the parking lot right now, ill grab it tomorrow and then scan it and post it up.
|
|
|
03-15-2010, 10:00 PM
|
#5
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
|
It was dynoed at Race Proven Motorsports in DE.
mods are:
'03 LS6 ZO6 crate engine from GM
TSP MS3 camshaft
Ported factory TB
LS6 intake
QTP LT headers with off road y pipe and magnaflow catback
Electric water pump
37# racetronix injectors
TSP air lid, with stock paper filter
and other minor stuff... ported ls6 oil pump, arp rod bolts, dual spring valvesprings, Harland sharp rebuilt factory rocker arms, fluidampner balancer, Textralia clutch.
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 12:35 AM
|
#6
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eatontown
Posts: 1,647
|
I think thats kind of low for an m6 and those mods. what are you revving to?
__________________
1999 C5 FRC: 12.7@114
2008 TBSS: 12.48@108
2017 Silverado 2500 do you even lift breh?
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 07:11 AM
|
#7
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
I think thats kind of low for an m6 and those mods. what are you revving to?
|
i think it was to 6400rpms. and that power seems close to similar setups ive seen, i dunno though.
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 10:31 AM
|
#8
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eatontown
Posts: 1,647
|
I was just thinking that the Ls6 crate motor puts out 450 bhp, and subtract 15% for drive loss, so your starting with about 380 hp to the ground without mods (except ls6 heads and 10.5 compression)
So, you have around 380+
ewp....5 hp
Headers...15 hp
Ls6 intake/TB....10 hp
Cam....I would hope you make no less than 25 more hp at peak with a Ms3
So my estimate is a conservative 435. I guess it may come down to how the dyno reads out, but Vinny was tuned on the same dyno and made 400 hp with a smaller cam and a few less mods.
__________________
1999 C5 FRC: 12.7@114
2008 TBSS: 12.48@108
2017 Silverado 2500 do you even lift breh?
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 10:44 AM
|
#9
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
|
LS6 is 405 hp.
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 11:50 AM
|
#10
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eatontown
Posts: 1,647
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS
LS6 is 405 hp.
|
405 hp through the Z06 drivetrain. I believe the f body is less efficient.
__________________
1999 C5 FRC: 12.7@114
2008 TBSS: 12.48@108
2017 Silverado 2500 do you even lift breh?
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 03:03 PM
|
#11
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
405 hp through the Z06 drivetrain. I believe the f body is less efficient.
|
you do realize the ls6 motor is rated at 405hp... thats not a rwhp rating, so drivetrain doesnt even come into play. I dont know where you came up with 450.
Last edited by V; 03-16-2010 at 03:05 PM.
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 06:00 PM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS
you do realize the ls6 motor is rated at 405hp... thats not a rwhp rating, so drivetrain doesnt even come into play. I dont know where you came up with 450.
|
He came up with that power because The LS6 probably makes over 405 hp. My 02 WS6 was rated 325hp at the crank and it dynoed 315rwhp bone stock! Add the 15% in for drivetrain loss and my motor was putting out 362hp @ the flywheel!! Just about every LS1 F-body owner I know when they dynoed there car stock it put out alot more then what GM said it would. The LS1 Vettes were pretty much dead on with what they dyno. I wouldnt be surprised if a stock LS6 out of a vette dynoes 20 more rwhp in a Camaro. Wouldnt surprise me one bit.
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
Last edited by Slow-V6; 03-20-2010 at 08:21 AM.
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 01:14 AM
|
#13
|
I <3 sheep
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
|
I dunno, I'd think the two added flex points for the half shafts in the Vette rear would eat up more power than the solid rear in the F-Body.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy
Steve has a thing for sheep....
|
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 06:13 AM
|
#14
|
Meet Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,366
|
well, does it idle at least?
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 11:38 AM
|
#15
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
|
yes, it idles as much as can be expected. lol
here's the print out...
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|