Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-25-2005, 11:08 PM   #1
Koll
14 Second Club
 
Koll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: RUM$ON, NJ
Posts: 2,308
iTrader: (0)
Decent Combo / Will it work?

Ok, 2 part question. First off, will this setup work. IE No problems bolting right up.

Second part. Car is a 91 Trans Am Vert with 350 TPI From 89. Stock except for Exhaust and a custom chip.

Parts :

Cam : "XFI" 292 Hydraulic Roller Camshaft Lift: .584"/.579" w/1.6 Rockers Duration: 292°/300°

Intake : LT1 converted intake from LT1intake.com

Heads :SBC Pro Series Aluminum Cylinder Heads

The heads are the biggest problem. They are 23*. Stock is 18 if I remember. Am I going to run into a problem?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fapist
K0ll is a hick and has a veritable fleet of 1980-early 90's GM vehicles :mullet:
Koll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 12:17 AM   #2
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
not a healthy or cost effective combo.
converted LT1 intakes are a waste of cash, convert a single plain carb intake and get twice teh gain. that cam is also large my huge, unless you plan to shift your stock bottom end at 7K i would recomend against it, the pro series heads are ok, but your bottom end won't handle a cam to support them anyway so it doesn't really matter.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 07:26 AM   #3
Koll
14 Second Club
 
Koll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: RUM$ON, NJ
Posts: 2,308
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
not a healthy or cost effective combo.
converted LT1 intakes are a waste of cash, convert a single plain carb intake and get twice teh gain. that cam is also large my huge, unless you plan to shift your stock bottom end at 7K i would recomend against it, the pro series heads are ok, but your bottom end won't handle a cam to support them anyway so it doesn't really matter.
More or less I just wanted to know if it would work. Not so much the gains.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fapist
K0ll is a hick and has a veritable fleet of 1980-early 90's GM vehicles :mullet:
Koll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 10:41 AM   #4
Slow Z
11 Second Club
 
Slow Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 587
iTrader: (1)
23* is the stock valve angle on a SBC. I wouldnt buy those heads either - I wouldnt trust a no-name aluminum head you find off ebay plus the 210cc is too big. Look into Canfield... Competition Motorsports sells Canfield 195's for $1050 complete shipped to your door. Cam is too big too...

Sounds like a recipe for slowness
__________________
Slow Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 12:30 PM   #5
Ian
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
iTrader: (7)
the engine will run, so technically it will "work"

the cam is too big, I agree there. The converted LT1 intake isnt really a waste of money as its better than the TPI setup by leaps and bounds. And I'd look into Bowtie vortec heads. they make aluminum ones now I think 8)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434 View Post
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.