Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > General Tech

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2008, 07:46 PM   #1
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
3rd gens with pro kit

I need a favor from you guys. I have hooker super comp long tubes and currently I have about 3.5" of ground clearance with them. The car still has the stock springs and I know for sure they are worn out and the car is lower than stock. I'm pretty sure I'll only lose maybe another .5" or so with the pro kit but I wanted to know what height you guys have from the ground to the center of the fender. Here are some pics I took:

front:



rear:





__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 08:15 PM   #2
Fast92RS
Power Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
iTrader: (13)
Just a little of topic but how do you like the hooker long tubes? Do they hit the frame anywhere? Did you have to modify anything to make them fit?
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL1
https://kraeserepairs.com

Last edited by Fast92RS; 01-06-2008 at 08:15 PM.
Fast92RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 08:16 PM   #3
edpontiac91
 
edpontiac91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Piscataway, N.J.
Posts: 1,729
iTrader: (16)
I've wanted to lower my 1991 Formula, but I have the Dual Cat Converters and my clearance is just about nil now. It scraps just getting it onto a drive-on lift and JUST barely makes it over the post lift setups. If I were you, I would put in the stock springs and SAVE your headers from being squashed the first time you have to go over a speed bump. I know it looks 100% better lowered, but the choice is yours.
__________________
1991 FORMULA 350-GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
1 of 1,197 with L98 Option/13.79@100 mph

1994 25th ANNIVERSARY TRANS AM GT -1
of ONLY 2,000 made/ Only 128 made with a HURST 6-Speed Manual and 91 with T-Tops and Compact Disc/ K & N Filtercharger/Magnaflow Performance Muffler/Air Foil- ORIGINAL MINT Arctic White Ultra Rare SURVIVOR. DAYTONA 500 PACE CAR Decal Kit!


SOLD: 1989 Turbo T/A in 1991 it ran 12:18@115 mph
edpontiac91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 10:04 PM   #4
//<86TA>\\
Power Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milford NJ
Posts: 1,526
iTrader: (1)
its going to be a tough call, cars weight varies between models and the mods done, i put my car on sportlines, and it was higher than other cars with the prokit.

this was my car on sportlines


I had 27-27.5" with a 25.7" tire. Which is close to most of the prokits ive seen on more stock vehicles
________
HAMBURGLAR

Last edited by //<86TA>\\; 05-04-2011 at 05:55 PM.
//<86TA>\\ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 10:46 PM   #5
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
I guess I need measurements from a camaro then to be more accurate. My car is pretty much stock as far as anything making significant weight difference. I have measurements from a 3rd gen camaro that had new moog iroc replacement springs installed and he was 27 3/4 up front and 28 3/4 in the back, which is an inch taller than how my car sits now. I guess I just have to grab the pro kit, install it, and see if I can live with it lol
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 10:51 PM   #6
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Fast92RS, I like the hooker super comp LT's a lot. I had to raise the engine a bit to get them in but other than that no problems. They don't hit the frame rails and are clear of everything. I grinded down an edge from where the control arm bolts to for some peace of mind that over time vibration wouldn't cause any rubbing, it was close, but that was it. I also had to use a starter from a 94-95 Z28, they're essentially "mini" starters compared to ours and not only are they light but they fit great. I needed headers to replace my ****** flowtech shorties I had and I knew I was swapping in a 400ci eventually, so I went with the LT's which will benefit me more down the road.
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 06:00 AM   #7
IROCdan330
12 Second Club
 
IROCdan330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vineland
Posts: 928
iTrader: (0)
I'll be going up to Josh's where my car is right now, tomorrow. If you can wait I will take a measurement for you. Just giving you the heads up, the pro-kit rear spring rate is exactly the same as a factory iroc spring...pro-kit made it look like the ass end came up just a hair and the front end drop considerably once it all settled...
__________________
87 iroc with the usual go fast stuff
heavier than your half ton.
IROCdan330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 06:20 AM   #8
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
that would be awesome, could you get pictures too?
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:34 AM   #9
Untamed
 
Untamed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,200
iTrader: (1)
What's the ride height with two adults in the car? Any significant loss of height?
__________________
I USED TO HAVE an 85 Camaro 305 4bbl, 90 Firebird V6, 97 Firebird V6 (10 speakers!). Despite the two family vehicles, 3 kids, wife and mortgage, I can finally realize the dream - 88 TA almost all stock... for now.

http://www.cardomain.com/id/untameddave

Wanted this - , but ended up with this - for free. Can't argue with free.
Untamed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 09:27 AM   #10
Fast92RS
Power Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
iTrader: (13)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teds89IROC View Post
Fast92RS, I like the hooker super comp LT's a lot. I had to raise the engine a bit to get them in but other than that no problems. They don't hit the frame rails and are clear of everything. I grinded down an edge from where the control arm bolts to for some peace of mind that over time vibration wouldn't cause any rubbing, it was close, but that was it. I also had to use a starter from a 94-95 Z28, they're essentially "mini" starters compared to ours and not only are they light but they fit great. I needed headers to replace my ****** flowtech shorties I had and I knew I was swapping in a 400ci eventually, so I went with the LT's which will benefit me more down the road.
Thanks I am looking into buying the 2210's or getting the stainless works ones from Hawks third gen. Hawks told me the stainless works ones offer more ground clearance than the 2210's.
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL1
https://kraeserepairs.com

Last edited by Fast92RS; 01-07-2008 at 09:28 AM.
Fast92RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 03:24 PM   #11
camaro2you
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,530
iTrader: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast92RS View Post
Thanks I am looking into buying the 2210's or getting the stainless works ones from Hawks third gen. Hawks told me the stainless works ones offer more ground clearance than the 2210's.
I might have my 2210's up for sale let me know.
camaro2you is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 04:46 PM   #12
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Untamed View Post
What's the ride height with two adults in the car? Any significant loss of height?
Not really. My springs are really shot, my car doesn't even take bumps, they just force the car all over the road. I think it's a combination of shot springs and shot bushings. I'm just about set for a front end rebuild, thats why I want to do the springs at the same time.
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 05:51 PM   #13
chrisfrom nj
 
chrisfrom nj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: west orange nj
Posts: 2,415
iTrader: (8)
ted i my sportline springs just came in i'll take pics as soon as i put them in
chrisfrom nj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 06:05 AM   #14
IROCdan330
12 Second Club
 
IROCdan330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vineland
Posts: 928
iTrader: (0)
ted, i don't have the time right now to upload the pictures for various reasons, but i did take them, and the front measures right to 26", the rear is 27.5".

If I had to judge I would say your springs aren't as shot as you would think.

there are pictures lurking around somewhere on this board of south meets in the past...i'll try to find some later.
__________________
87 iroc with the usual go fast stuff
heavier than your half ton.
IROCdan330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > General Tech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.