Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-11-2008, 01:15 PM   #26
Frosty
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 7,108
iTrader: (1)
I'm still thinking about this, not only would they absorb the actual car models think of all the employees and whatever wonderful contract they have with the crooked UAW...getting rid of those employees won't be easy. I could see GM keeping my most of Chrysler's products since they compete in some car classes.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS Redline package, ESC Novi 1500 tuned by EFX, Might Mouse wild catch can, GM STB, smoked ZL1 3rd brake light, Xpel XR Black 35% tint all around, Street Scene front splitter, C7 Carbon ZL1 side skirts, Drake Muscle Car Wickerbill spoiler

2010 Infiniti G37x-Moonlight White w/Graphite interior. Stock...for now. Xpel XR Black tint(hey it's a mod lol)
Frosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 02:40 PM   #27
1QWIKBIRD
11 Second Club
 
1QWIKBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton Twp, NJ
Posts: 855
iTrader: (5)
Cummins Diesel with an Allison behind it, wrapped in a Silverado skin? Sounds Yummy
__________________


1999 Formula 6spd (The driver)
1997 2500 Ext. Cab Dodge 4x4 CTD 5spd (The Earth Mover)
1970 Nova 5spd (The toy)
1QWIKBIRD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 02:42 PM   #28
r0nin89
 
r0nin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1QWIKBIRD View Post
Cummins Diesel with an Allison behind it, wrapped in a Silverado skin? Sounds Yummy
I didnt even think of that. Chevy trucks with a cummins in them would be a dream come true.
__________________
-Vinnie

94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
r0nin89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 03:18 PM   #29
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Cummings is a third party, not a part of Chrysler corp, just licensed to provide engines for Chrysler. GM owns the D-max brand/name. It would be a catastrophic waste of money to end up with a product that is basically equal.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 03:53 PM   #30
1QWIKBIRD
11 Second Club
 
1QWIKBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton Twp, NJ
Posts: 855
iTrader: (5)
I thought Dmax was a joint venture with Isuzu and GM sold off its last shares of Isuzu a couple years ago? Did it keep the rights to the Dmax engine? So unless GM was able to keep the technology and rights, I am sure they are paying Isuzu for supplying the engines in one form or another, irregardless of the them being built here.

Unless GM and Isuzu are in bed together on import export deals over in Isuzuland. I think GM could benefit from the Cummins relationship.

I just turned 200,000 in my CTD and wouldn't trade it for the anything.
__________________


1999 Formula 6spd (The driver)
1997 2500 Ext. Cab Dodge 4x4 CTD 5spd (The Earth Mover)
1970 Nova 5spd (The toy)
1QWIKBIRD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 04:03 PM   #31
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
The D-max was a joint technology development deal. The basics of the engine and all of the controllers and such were made with the companies working together. GM retained the rights to the D-max and Isuzu kept the rights for a series of smaller diesels used in eastern Europe, Asia, and Africa.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 05:23 PM   #32
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Holy Moly...

What could GM benifit? Well, they want to sell the Renn Center, so selling that and moving into Auburn Hills means a freebee HQ.
Jeep and the new Minivans are good. The new Ram is going to be rebadged as a Nissan, and Nissan and Chrysler has a lot of ties. GM can enjoy the cash flow from Nissan as well as VW that makes thier "German Engineerd" VW Town and Country err...Caravan..err...Routun or whatever the hell VW calls that rebadge job.
Nissan could buy the rest of the empty plants from GM/Chrysler to up thier American production.

Clearly Chrysler would make out like a bandit, now having access to the engineering of GM. They would no longer need to use Nissan to develop a compact platform. This could either be a joint-venture or a full merger, but if that was teh case, we are talking about massive MASSIVE cut backs in divisions, brands, and car lines.

IMO, this is a poor move for GM when they have very little money now, I dont understand why they would do this outside of it being more of a trade off for the rest of GMAC and this is the only way without burning up too much money.

It would mean a totaly different world car wise. Chrysler would be stripped of nothing. Not one single car they currently make is better then a GM product outside of the Ram and the Jeep brand as a whole which really has no major competition. With CAFE and GM's already overstocked brands, I dont see this as being any good at all.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 08:33 PM   #33
ws6 jim
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Garden State
Posts: 417
iTrader: (2)
Why hasn't anyone mentioned the the return of the LS powered K car?!?
__________________
2015 Z51 C7 sold
2016 Hemi 75th WK2 sold
2017 50th SS sold
2001 XJ SOLD SOLD SOLD!!!
ws6 jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 09:38 PM   #34
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
pontiac viper??? LSx V10????
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 02:14 AM   #35
Savage_Messiah
2007 Member of the Year
 
Savage_Messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seabrook, TX
Posts: 14,281
iTrader: (1)
How about GM taking over those electric jeep, minivan and roadster projects....
__________________
WF=DF

Kommandant
of the ACL (Anti Canadian League)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTb1ow View Post
Junk the pos, spend the money on beer, acquire headache.

Same result cept this headache doesnt last months.
Savage_Messiah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 03:15 AM   #36
HeadlessNorseman
 
HeadlessNorseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Long Branch NJ
Posts: 706
iTrader: (0)
lsx wrangler would be nice. although they stopped putting v8s in wranglers for a reason. Since that was such a great idea, if they dont do it, im gonna build my own!
HeadlessNorseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 08:11 AM   #37
Frosty
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 7,108
iTrader: (1)
Would you guys get your heads out of the clouds. There will be no LSx Viper, no LSx K-car, etc.

Damn...
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS Redline package, ESC Novi 1500 tuned by EFX, Might Mouse wild catch can, GM STB, smoked ZL1 3rd brake light, Xpel XR Black 35% tint all around, Street Scene front splitter, C7 Carbon ZL1 side skirts, Drake Muscle Car Wickerbill spoiler

2010 Infiniti G37x-Moonlight White w/Graphite interior. Stock...for now. Xpel XR Black tint(hey it's a mod lol)
Frosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 09:27 AM   #38
r0nin89
 
r0nin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER View Post
Cummings is a third party, not a part of Chrysler corp, just licensed to provide engines for Chrysler. GM owns the D-max brand/name. It would be a catastrophic waste of money to end up with a product that is basically equal.
I know that and I beg to differ that they are equal. A cummins is a far superior motor when it comes to longevity, mileage, and torque.
__________________
-Vinnie

94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
r0nin89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 05:09 PM   #39
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Dmax is the most powerful diesel engine in any pick up truck to date.
More then the mega huge 6cyl Cummings. The Dmax is king of the roost. And the new mini Max, the 4.5 Dmax that will show up in a year will also be one of the best on the market, taking up space of a Gen IV small block, while brining anywhere from 24-27mpg highway.

Wana good read?

http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f...1/#post1534651

wrote it up today at work.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 05:23 PM   #40
12secondv6
Token v6 Guy
 
12secondv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: No longer neon land :(
Posts: 5,703
iTrader: (6)
Rebirth of the neon - RWD - viper powered ... nuff said!
__________________
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 - 12.079 at 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO - stage 4+ tune and an intake - no times yet
12secondv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 06:41 PM   #41
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
Dmax is the most powerful diesel engine in any pick up truck to date.
More then the mega huge 6cyl Cummings. The Dmax is king of the roost. And the new mini Max, the 4.5 Dmax that will show up in a year will also be one of the best on the market, taking up space of a Gen IV small block, while brining anywhere from 24-27mpg highway.
I'm a big fan of the Duramax series of motors, but the older 5.9 Cummins and the new 6.7 Cummins are great motors too. And the Dmax does make more peak power, but the Cummins makes more down low, where it counts (don't forget their 6.xx:1 first gear in the M6), which makes an ideal setup for hauling big loads. Again, not taking anything away from the D-max or the Allison trannies....

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 08:22 PM   #42
HeadlessNorseman
 
HeadlessNorseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Long Branch NJ
Posts: 706
iTrader: (0)
On the other side, a duramax powered wrangler would be an amazing trail vehicle. My grandpa has a duramax truck that is just as fast as my formula and gets almost double the mileage. well not really but 22-25mpg AND 600+ ft lbs out of a crew cab 4wd truck is amazing tho
HeadlessNorseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 09:16 PM   #43
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

the current Duramax is WAY to heavy to stick in the nose of a Wranger, the new smaller version would prolly be better. A 4BT is a good fit though

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:56 PM   #44
chemicalstylez
 
chemicalstylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gibbstown, NJ
Posts: 426
iTrader: (0)
chryslers with transmissions that last longer than 40k miles..... wow that would be a miracle! i say they pass on them honestly, their such garbage lol.
__________________

2000 Trans Am WS6 - CAMMED & SLAMMED sitting on 18 Z06 wheels.
362 RWHP / 358RWTQ
2007 Trailblazer SS - 1 baby seat
chemicalstylez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:10 AM   #45
Mike
BadMod
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
iTrader: (17)
the challenger platform would be a nice base for a new rear drive impalla
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva View Post
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:53 AM   #46
CivicEaterLT1
 
CivicEaterLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Plainfield NJ
Posts: 271
iTrader: (0)
id like to get my hands on a viper lol
__________________
95 Lt1... SLP dual CAI, Hooker Exaust, M.A.C Headers, Shift Kit, 3.73s , drilled hollow cat, C5 Vette rims, KYB AGX shocks, MAF.

90 V6 firebird... Dead =/
CivicEaterLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 09:55 AM   #47
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbrrmike View Post
the Zeta platform would make for such a great replacement for that POS cobbled together, half chrysler half old W124 MB chassis that is under the 300/Charger/Challenger.
Fixed.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 10:43 AM   #48
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbrrmike View Post
the challenger platform would be a nice base for a new rear drive impalla
The G8 will too when they kill PMD.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 03:10 PM   #49
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbrrmike View Post
the Zeta platform would make for such a great replacement for that POS cobbled together, half chrysler half old W124 MB chassis that is under the 300/Charger/Challenger.
Quote:
Fixed.
Yeah, let's hope they get rid of that horrible platform that sold a few million units world wide over the course of a decade in cars much more refined than that blessed new Camaro

Seriously Al, let it go. Every time you comment on the Charger you sound like more and more of blind fan boi.

Chrysler made a fine car, if you aren't enough of a real car guy to notice, that is your short fall. Not the Benz platform it is based on.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 09:55 PM   #50
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Drive a Charger RT, then drive a G8 GT.
Tell me which one is better.
I have
I know
Fan Boyism aside. G8 GT is a better car then the Charger on every measurable and subjective test. Why on God green earth would GM throw Zeta away and use Chrysler's? Cause it sold a lot of units? ****, if that was the case, the W body is the best ****ing chassis ever made, better then the current LX because Impala itself outsells ALL the LX cars COMBINED!

Chassis dynamics, thats the name of the game. GM has a plant ready to make half a million Zeta's a year.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.