 |
|
08-31-2009, 10:28 PM
|
#51
|
Admin.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1Hawk
When they had Pontiac engines, they were different cars. For example, you couldn't get a Ram Air IV on a '69 Camaro, or a 455 SD on a '74 Camaro, which BTW the Trans Am was the fastest American-production car that year. The first Chevy engine didn't show up in a Firebird until 1980, but even then you could still get the 301. Yes, they shared the same framework and structure. But for the better part of two generations, they weren't just re-badged Camaros.
|
that is why I singled out 3rd & 4th gens
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!
The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.
Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.
Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
|
|
|
09-01-2009, 08:28 AM
|
#52
|
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1Hawk
When they had Pontiac engines, they were different cars. For example, you couldn't get a Ram Air IV on a '69 Camaro, or a 455 SD on a '74 Camaro, which BTW the Trans Am was the fastest American-production car that year. The first Chevy engine didn't show up in a Firebird until 1980, but even then you could still get the 301. Yes, they shared the same framework and structure. But for the better part of two generations, they weren't just re-badged Camaros.
|
An engine doesnt change whether or not they were made on the same production line with the same frame. Ever heard of Any Motors Corporation?  So if you ordered one with a chevy engine it was a chevy because it had a chevy engine in it? or if I put a chevy engine in a fox body it is magically a chevy?
They have always been a Camaro, sorry to burst your bubble there. And BTW I am a Pontiac guy but I own two Camaros
Last edited by PolarBear; 09-01-2009 at 08:29 AM.
|
|
|
09-01-2009, 09:23 AM
|
#53
|
LSwhatever
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belcamp, MD
Posts: 278
|
Like it or not , I think the "new" Trans Am should not exist without Pontiac. And I don't like it.
__________________
-Felipe

2001 WS6: SDPC LS7 Shortblock, L92 heads upgraded for .600 lift,
L76 intake, Nick Williams TB, Comp Cams 224/228 .581/.588 114+2LSA,
1 7/8 LT's, GMMG
waiting for some boost
2003 Silverado 1500HD
|
|
|
09-01-2009, 04:15 PM
|
#54
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolarBear
An engine doesnt change whether or not they were made on the same production line with the same frame. Ever heard of Any Motors Corporation?  So if you ordered one with a chevy engine it was a chevy because it had a chevy engine in it? or if I put a chevy engine in a fox body it is magically a chevy?
They have always been a Camaro, sorry to burst your bubble there. And BTW I am a Pontiac guy but I own two Camaros
|
I think what hawk means is that yeah it's a firebird, but an integral part of what makes people buy cars is the drivetrain options. when pontiac used only their motors, the firebird ment a little something more to pontiac owners, because they had drivetrain otions others didnt come with such as the 455 SD  lol
You are correct what you mean, but for the majority of the frame, suspension, braking, and other parts, they were almost identical, what made them different from each other was the drivetrain interior, and outside appearnce, and performance numbers. when Pontiac started using chevy motors, though parts were easier to interchange and obtain, they became more identical then ever, and it now came down to interior and outside appearance that seperated them, otherwise performance wise, you were buying basicall the same car,
That's just my 0.02
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
|
Last edited by Blacdout96; 09-01-2009 at 04:17 PM.
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 09:39 AM
|
#55
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacdout96
I think what hawk means is that yeah it's a firebird, but an integral part of what makes people buy cars is the drivetrain options. when pontiac used only their motors, the firebird ment a little something more to pontiac owners, because they had drivetrain otions others didnt come with such as the 455 SD  lol
You are correct what you mean, but for the majority of the frame, suspension, braking, and other parts, they were almost identical, what made them different from each other was the drivetrain interior, and outside appearnce, and performance numbers. when Pontiac started using chevy motors, though parts were easier to interchange and obtain, they became more identical then ever, and it now came down to interior and outside appearance that seperated them, otherwise performance wise, you were buying basicall the same car,
That's just my 0.02
|
Yes, that was my point exactly. I think most agree when they hear the term "re-badge" it refers to one car that has a counterpart of the exact same equivalent, only the name and appearance are changed. It implies everything is carried over from one car to the other: engine, powertrain, framework, etc. which would make it a complete re-badge. When Pontiac still made their own engines, it gave buyers different options that weren't available in the Camaro. For example, ram air induction was only available on the Firebird 400 in '67-'68, and didn't show up to my knowledge on the Camaro until the '69 SS. So for those first two years, if you wanted ram air on an F-Body, Firebird was the choice. All I'm saying is for sometime, eventhough it was in most respects a "re-badge," the Firebird/Trans Am had options that made it its own car.
__________________
John
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 10:50 AM
|
#56
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Union Twp. & Jersey City
Posts: 19
|
I think it's nice. Really a rebodied camaro thats what the trans has always been. I really do like it though.
__________________
  NJFBODYNJ
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 11:07 AM
|
#57
|
12 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Haddon Twp NJ
Posts: 2,213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
They really went for the 77 T/A Bandit look, huh? Even the exhaust tips
|
Yea thats why it looks horrible.... nothing wrong with second gens but on a car thats suppose to look like a 1st gen. The tail panel looks really bad
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 07:22 PM
|
#58
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Salem, NJ
Posts: 81
|
heres another shot of the rear
__________________
2004 Silverado SS
|
|
|
09-03-2009, 10:02 AM
|
#59
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,200
|
I like some of it, but would need to change a few things.
1. A shaker / cowl combo doesn't look right. One or the other.
2. The bird coloring needs to be more "gold" like the 2nd gen SEs
3. The rear is hideous - a ducktail spoiler is fine, but not that stupid thing.
4. If they want to use "retro style" tail lights, then something closer to the 3rd/4th gen lights with the grid pattern on it, would look better.
Overall I like the direction they're going in with the front end. But the rest of the body kit needs changes.
__________________
I USED TO HAVE an 85 Camaro 305 4bbl, 90 Firebird V6, 97 Firebird V6 (10 speakers!). Despite the two family vehicles, 3 kids, wife and mortgage, I can finally realize the dream - 88 TA almost all stock... for now.
http://www.cardomain.com/id/untameddave
Wanted this -  , but ended up with this -  for free. Can't argue with free.
|
|
|
09-03-2009, 10:38 PM
|
#60
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Salem, NJ
Posts: 81
|
confirmed conversion?
__________________
2004 Silverado SS
|
|
|
09-03-2009, 10:50 PM
|
#61
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Little Egg Harbor NJ
Posts: 1,175
|
i dont like it.
__________________
2011 Camaro 1SS Cyber Grey Metallic
2005 Silverado
|
|
|
09-03-2009, 11:01 PM
|
#62
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Medford, NJ
Posts: 502
|
Its just a conversion kit for the new camaro.... google phoinex trans am conversion
__________________
1993 Trans Am ---> LT1 bolt ons (Sold)
2002 Firehawk Trans Am ---> SLP 400HP kit, LS6 intake, LS6 block (Sold.... Miss her)
Current Vehicle
2002 Chevy Silverado 1500
2005 GSXR 750 Street Fighter Flat Black Red Rims
|
|
|
09-03-2009, 11:01 PM
|
#63
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
|
that one is amazing!
|
|
|
09-03-2009, 11:17 PM
|
#64
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 7,108
|
They need to just let it go....let it ****ing die.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS Redline package, ESC Novi 1500 tuned by EFX, Might Mouse wild catch can, GM STB, smoked ZL1 3rd brake light, Xpel XR Black 35% tint all around, Street Scene front splitter, C7 Carbon ZL1 side skirts, Drake Muscle Car Wickerbill spoiler
2010 Infiniti G37x-Moonlight White w/Graphite interior. Stock...for now. Xpel XR Black tint(hey it's a mod lol)
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 07:55 AM
|
#65
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
|
The taillights are too close to each other, they need to spread them out to the ends a little more. that back panel though fits in there wierd, needs to mbe more flush. andthe trans am sign should be put lower , either just below the license plate, or on that panel I just discussed, not up on the wing. I like the direction they are goping, but to properly execute it, change some panels, not just the bumpers and rims.
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
|
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 08:28 AM
|
#66
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosty
They need to just let it go....let it ****ing die.
|
Agreed.
Everything they are doing looks like **** and an aftermarket conversion.
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 12:03 PM
|
#67
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
|
Lets just make sure that we all know that this is not a GM piece, but an aftermaket piece.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 03:01 PM
|
#68
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Lets just make sure that we all know that this is not a GM piece, but an aftermaket piece.
|
well with pontiac being dead we are all pretty confidant its not a gm product
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 03:37 PM
|
#69
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 7,108
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon
well with pontiac being dead we are all pretty confidant its not a gm product 
|
There are plenty of idiots out there that will think it's truly a Firebird.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS Redline package, ESC Novi 1500 tuned by EFX, Might Mouse wild catch can, GM STB, smoked ZL1 3rd brake light, Xpel XR Black 35% tint all around, Street Scene front splitter, C7 Carbon ZL1 side skirts, Drake Muscle Car Wickerbill spoiler
2010 Infiniti G37x-Moonlight White w/Graphite interior. Stock...for now. Xpel XR Black tint(hey it's a mod lol)
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 03:47 PM
|
#70
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
|
I dont know about you all but I am content with owning the last year T/A ever produced!!
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 04:38 PM
|
#71
|
Avatar Abuser
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 08721-1716
Posts: 5,056
|
they... just... won't... let... it... die...
kind of like michael jackson, only you don't have to worry about your juvenile child getting too close.
__________________
JSFBOA
Save a life.
N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 06:52 PM
|
#72
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,106
|
so if any one on the forum ever gets one of these we will beat him down right????
Last edited by Saitin; 09-04-2009 at 07:04 PM.
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 07:02 PM
|
#73
|
Avatar Abuser
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 08721-1716
Posts: 5,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saitin
so of any one on the forum ever gets one of these we will beat him down right????
|
and then tar and feather him.
__________________
JSFBOA
Save a life.
N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
|
|
|
09-04-2009, 07:07 PM
|
#74
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: manchester, NJ
Posts: 1,775
|
say what you want... although its kinda gay its not a GM product.... i think a few of those pics look cool... mainly the ones designed after the 77-78 birds... the early 2nd gen design doesnt fit right... i think its pretty cool it the products are good quality... i have yet to see a decent aftermarket body part that has a good fit and finish... cervinis comes close but they still suck... companies like roush make nice stuff... if its good quality like that i dont see a problem with it... hey al.... does GM pay you to look out for them like that on the net...?? just curious ahahha....
__________________
97 Firebird Formula - 383LT1
15 Subaru WRX - 2.0L-turbo
|
|
|
09-05-2009, 01:13 AM
|
#75
|
The Plague
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cherry Hill
Posts: 955
|
What does a 2010 Firebird and Michael Jackson have in common?
Plastic.
What does a 2010 Firebird and MLK have in common?
A dream.
What does a 2010 Firebird and a vtec owner have in common?
Fantasy's @ 11 sec. 1/4 miles
__________________
www.cardomain.com/id/1972lt-1
My sanity wrote a suicide note.....one of us is illiterate and the other is blind.-OTEP
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and in stranger aeons even death may die-H.P.L.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|