Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2006, 01:22 PM   #1
deadtrend1
11 second club / Moderator
 
deadtrend1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
iTrader: (11)
Need your opinions on suspension ideas.

gonan be ordering a lot of tubular items soon and wanan see what some expert input could be on this.

First, Im definetly going to order the spohn (or UMI, not sure yet) g-load brace-mounted torque arm. Now where Im stuck at, is should i order the one for the long tube setup or order the flat one. I have SLP shorties and stock y-pipe on and im 40% set on getting long tubes in the future. Not sure If I should get the long tube one now and if i dont get long tubes just keep it in there anyways. Or if i get the flat one now, and then if i ever get LT's, talk to the manufacturer and see if i can order the different brace.

next LCA relo brackets
thinking about lowering my car, but wanna see how it looks with 17" ws6 rims first. Now, if i keep the stock height, will relo brackets still help with traction, or are they mainly for correcting the geometry on lowered cars.

Adjustable Panhard bar and LCA's
If i lower it, I will need the adjustable panhard bar so I will order one anyways, but what about the LCA's. Should I order adj. or non?
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57

1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
deadtrend1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2006, 02:04 PM   #2
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,473
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

LCA relo's will help no matter what...

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 01:51 AM   #3
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,077
iTrader: (12)
if you have an adjustable TQ arm, adjustable lcas arent really needed as much as if you had a fixed TQ arm. Or at least thats what ive been told. BUT Personally myself i have the crossmember mounted adjustable spohn TQ arm, spohn adjustable LCAs(poly body side bushing, spherical rod end axle side) and spohn adjustable panhard bar(poly body/spherical rod end axle). I also have bolt on lca relocation brackets. With just the TQ arm installed, the car felt so much stiffer and hooked way harder, and i only drove less than 2 miles with the other parts installed before the motor blew but i did notice a difference then too. As for the longtube issue, i will have long tubes with the new motor, btu i havent checked to see if they will fit, im hoping they will and if not, it wont be a big deal to make em fit, since i'll probably be running a true dual setup anyway if a single exhaust cant flow enough for what i need. But if there are different versions , i'd say just get the LT one now just in case.

Last edited by V; 03-06-2006 at 10:30 AM.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 10:23 AM   #4
Pampered-Z
Sliderule / Moderator
 
Pampered-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
iTrader: (1)
I would order the one for the long tubes. I didn't and ended up having to get one to clear my exhaust when I decided later to do more mods.

The adjustable LCA will allow you to move your rear, If you can find the post Fred, (injuneer) details how it is useful if you want to run larger tires.

For a few dollars more you should get parts that you can use if you do future mods.

JB
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada

1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!
Pampered-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 03:24 PM   #5
deadtrend1
11 second club / Moderator
 
deadtrend1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
iTrader: (11)
Thanks for the responses. Lt1 t/a arm, adjustable LCA's panhard and relobrakets it is.
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57

1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
deadtrend1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 12:17 PM   #6
Injuneer
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 155
iTrader: (0)
There is not much to "adjust" with an adjustable LCA. You can't make any real changes in the pinion angle.... not on a torque arm suspension. I used mine to move the rear axle assembly back 1/4" to get some extra clearance at the front of the fender for 28" slicks.

As far as the LCA relo brackets, for straight line traction they will help whether your car is lowered or not. My car sits about 1/2" higher in back because of the Eibach Drag Launch springs, and adding the Spohn relo brackets made a huge improvement in traction. Completely eliminated wheel hop.

__________________
Fred


1994 Formula - 381ci / 300-shot N2O / TH400 / Gear Vendor OD / Strange 12-bolt 4.11 - 11.5@117 on straight motor
Injuneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 03:00 PM   #7
deadtrend1
11 second club / Moderator
 
deadtrend1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
iTrader: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Injuneer
There is not much to "adjust" with an adjustable LCA.
so unless i plan on running oversized tires which i don't, then dont bother with them, and get straight tubed?
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57

1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
deadtrend1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 11:46 AM   #8
Injuneer
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 155
iTrader: (0)
Yes.... save your money. You don't need adjustable LCA's.
Injuneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 02:52 PM   #9
deadtrend1
11 second club / Moderator
 
deadtrend1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
iTrader: (11)
alright, that was one of the things i wasnt sure of. Thanks
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57

1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
deadtrend1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 01:00 AM   #10
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Injuneer
There is not much to "adjust" with an adjustable LCA. You can't make any real changes in the pinion angle.... not on a torque arm suspension. I used mine to move the rear axle assembly back 1/4" to get some extra clearance at the front of the fender for 28" slicks.

As far as the LCA relo brackets, for straight line traction they will help whether your car is lowered or not. My car sits about 1/2" higher in back because of the Eibach Drag Launch springs, and adding the Spohn relo brackets made a huge improvement in traction. Completely eliminated wheel hop.

Not to hihjack Tim's thread, but did those drag launch springs lower the front of your car at all? I'm juggling the issue between drag launch springs and moog replacement iroc springs. I don't plan on drag racing the car (I will, but just to see how it does, but no competition) and I want to keep my 17x9 275 tires all around. I want good performance for the street though. Also, I kind of like the look of the back sitting a little higher than the front, or the front lower than the back..however you look at it.

~Ted
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140

Last edited by Teds89IROC; 03-12-2006 at 01:02 AM.
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 12:44 PM   #11
Injuneer
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 155
iTrader: (0)
I have QA1/HAL shocks with QA1 springs in the front. They are adjustable, and set to stock ride height.

In the back I have the Eibach Drag Launch springs. They raised the back end about 1/2". Then the 28" slicks raise it up another 1".... So it has a bit of a rake......

Injuneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2006, 11:09 AM   #12
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
that car looks mean as hell!

~Ted
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2006, 03:35 PM   #13
Injuneer
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 155
iTrader: (0)
Naaaa..... its just a pussycat.

Injuneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.