 |
08-28-2005, 01:45 PM
|
#1
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
01 SS vs. 05 Ford GT
http://redworm.net/trmin8r/trmin8rvsfordgt.wmv
The SS:
Quote:
2001 Arctic White Camaro SS M6 #3136
Dyno #'s Best n/a- 414RWHP/378RWTQ
Best n2o- 602RWHP/610RWTQ
Best e.t. to date in Abq- 12.31@124mph
|
and a stock 05 ford GT.
First race the GT lets off due to traffic ahead, but the 2nd race the SS clearly beats him.
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 03:40 PM
|
#2
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fl.
Posts: 616
|
****in sick
__________________
Boats and hos.
Current: 1999 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L
Old: 1990 Firebird Formula WS6, 1991 Camaro RS, 1992 Nissan Stanza
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 04:53 PM
|
#3
|
|
13 Second Club / Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,684
|
he definately had to juice to beat them though. still sick though
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 05:32 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bergenfield NJ
Posts: 353
|
Half the time I see "Ford GT" written, I think Mustang. The comments in the thread made me think WTF until I saw the vid 
__________________
1999 NBM Corvette Coupe - modified....
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 06:03 PM
|
#5
|
|
Keyboard Tough Guy
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
|
I wouldve liked to have seen the gt vs the ss na...the ss should run 120 traps in the 1/4....i dont think the gt is much more then that meaning it would be an uber close race na vs na.
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 06:45 PM
|
#6
|
|
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by foff667
I wouldve liked to have seen the gt vs the ss na...the ss should run 120 traps in the 1/4....i dont think the gt is much more then that meaning it would be an uber close race na vs na.
|
The GT is supercharged from the factory. I doubt there would be an na vs na race 
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 06:55 PM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
|
Bah, Ian beat me....
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 07:10 PM
|
#8
|
|
MIR
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,692
|
Nice, i guess Poopra wanted a piece too
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 07:36 PM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pequannock, NJ
Posts: 1,854
|
that supra just kinda jumped in....i don't think he was ready for it either.
__________________
1998 Saturn SL2
-=NORTH JERSEY NOT ONLY OWNS YOU, WE OWN YOUR MOM TOO.=-
Veritas et Aequitas
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 08:15 PM
|
#10
|
|
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Bah, Ian beat me....
|
8)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 08:48 PM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glassboro
Posts: 62
|
I think that video is not as it seems.
If you read the thread at the actual site, that Supra has 1000rwhp. Also, apparently the guy in the Ford GT wasn't really racing the second time or something. The first time, he just slowed down for traffic.
The guy in the Supra never caught cause he was running street tires. He kept spinning out.
__________________
~
97 Camaro
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 09:03 PM
|
#12
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by foff667
I wouldve liked to have seen the gt vs the ss na...the ss should run 120 traps in the 1/4....i dont think the gt is much more then that meaning it would be an uber close race na vs na.
|
the SS trapped 124 NA i believe...im pretty sure the GT would rape it NA though, the camaro only has 414rwhp and weighs more, as opposed to the GT having 550 and i dont have a clue how much it weighs but i bet its lighter than the camaro.
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2005, 09:21 PM
|
#13
|
|
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dz
I think that video is not as it seems.
If you read the thread at the actual site, that Supra has 1000rwhp. Â*Also, apparently the guy in the Ford GT wasn't really racing the second time or something. Â*The first time, he just slowed down for traffic.
The guy in the Supra never caught cause he was running street tires. Â*He kept spinning out.
|
I dont care if the SS runs 14's at the track and the other cars run nines. they raced, the SS won and the other two lost, thats just how it goes. If the billion hp supra knew he was gonna spin, he shouldn't have even bothered racing. When you race on the street, track numbers and horsepower dont mean ****.
Dont take this post the wrong way, I have nothing against you or any of the drivers, but when you lose, you lose. plain and simple.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-29-2005, 12:56 AM
|
#14
|
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing/Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,904
|
__________________
EB
99 Riviera, Bone stock, 14.34 @ 96 "Walking 5.0's in luxury" RIP
95 Cherokee, Bone stock 16.2 @ 83 "Treeing your 3rd gen and beating it to the line despite trapping less....and looking better"
93 TA, Bone stock, 13.8 @ 100 "Beating ****** drivers in ****** LS1's"
https://www.facebook.com/groups/285090241699967/
R.I.P. Tia 
|
|
|
|
|
08-29-2005, 01:04 AM
|
#15
|
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing/Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,904
|
__________________
EB
99 Riviera, Bone stock, 14.34 @ 96 "Walking 5.0's in luxury" RIP
95 Cherokee, Bone stock 16.2 @ 83 "Treeing your 3rd gen and beating it to the line despite trapping less....and looking better"
93 TA, Bone stock, 13.8 @ 100 "Beating ****** drivers in ****** LS1's"
https://www.facebook.com/groups/285090241699967/
R.I.P. Tia
|
|
|
|
|
08-29-2005, 08:07 PM
|
#16
|
|
Guest
|
the race against the first bike was sick... the second bike was kinda funny tho
|
|
|
|
|
08-29-2005, 09:21 PM
|
#17
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pequannock, NJ
Posts: 1,854
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dz
I think that video is not as it seems.
If you read the thread at the actual site, that Supra has 1000rwhp. Also, apparently the guy in the Ford GT wasn't really racing the second time or something. The first time, he just slowed down for traffic.
The guy in the Supra never caught cause he was running street tires. He kept spinning out.
|
i don't know how many 1000 HP supras i've seen that only run 12s, because they run such ungodly amounts of boost that the turbo lag kills their ET.
i don't care if he was running on street tires or not. he still lost.
__________________
1998 Saturn SL2
-=NORTH JERSEY NOT ONLY OWNS YOU, WE OWN YOUR MOM TOO.=-
Veritas et Aequitas
|
|
|
|
|
08-29-2005, 09:32 PM
|
#18
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dz
I think that video is not as it seems.
If you read the thread at the actual site, that Supra has 1000rwhp. Also, apparently the guy in the Ford GT wasn't really racing the second time or something. The first time, he just slowed down for traffic.
The guy in the Supra never caught cause he was running street tires. He kept spinning out.
|
i don't know how many 1000 HP supras i've seen that only run 12s, because they run such ungodly amounts of boost that the turbo lag kills their ET.
i don't care if he was running on street tires or not. he still lost. |
actually, its not so much the turbo lag...its the lack of traction from first through...4th gear
its really hard to get wide slicks in the back of them without hacking it all up, thats the problem.
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
08-30-2005, 12:14 AM
|
#19
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery NJ
Posts: 1,271
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GP99GT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dz
I think that video is not as it seems.
If you read the thread at the actual site, that Supra has 1000rwhp. Also, apparently the guy in the Ford GT wasn't really racing the second time or something. The first time, he just slowed down for traffic.
The guy in the Supra never caught cause he was running street tires. He kept spinning out.
|
i don't know how many 1000 HP supras i've seen that only run 12s, because they run such ungodly amounts of boost that the turbo lag kills their ET.
i don't care if he was running on street tires or not. he still lost. |
actually, its not so much the turbo lag...its the lack of traction from first through...4th gear
its really hard to get wide slicks in the back of them without hacking it all up, thats the problem. |
I see at as it is... it's the peaky torque curve. Those things are hard to drive because of the boost coming in as hard as it does. It's the same with those turbo motorcycles, it's the exact same thing when the Supra's are making 1000hp. Imagine having to jab the throttle to spool up the car then back off the throttle while you're accelerating as the boost comes on just to keep the tires from going up in smoke. That is why they're slow and why I'd rather have a 600hp Supra than a 1000hp Supra  . One is a lot easier to drive and is that much faster when it comes to stop light racing.
__________________
, Jon
Owner of a Red Sled.
If it\'s EFI I can tune it. Specialize in 82-95 GM (yes Lt1\'s)
\"If you can leave black marks on a straight from the time you exit a corner till the time you brake for the next turn.......Then, you have enough horsepower\" - Mark Donohue 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
