Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2010, 07:07 PM   #51
ib4200
 
ib4200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: bridgewater
Posts: 868
iTrader: (1)
do a cams only Lt5 swap
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
its an ongoing joke between the Geo Storm crew and the Sebring coupe team.
bolt-ons and a bed n' breakfast

Last edited by ib4200; 02-25-2010 at 07:08 PM.
ib4200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 11:21 PM   #52
Stupercharged
 
Stupercharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Union NJ
Posts: 246
iTrader: (0)
Oh I kno stock heads dont flowwell but i'd rather say i touched 11s on bone stock heads and be part of that few.Im not crazy concerned about drivability on the streets as long as it runs and moves i'll be happy lol. It will just be one of those little achievements where after i can say now what can I run with heads
__________________
94 Z28 Charcoal Grey Metallic - Engine and Trans Delete Mod.. Light as Hell

07' Saturn Aura - Daily
94' Camaro LSX SWAP someday....- Drive Way Ornament
98' Camaro LS1 M6 - SOLD
98' GTP Forged and saw 14lbs of boost - Grenaded and SOLD
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS View Post
the best ricers to mess with are the ones that have those annoying blue and red lights. they are very persistent, ill give them that...
Stupercharged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 07:08 AM   #53
Blacdout96
 
Blacdout96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
iTrader: (2)
Aren't heads off a police car known to flow better then Camaro LT1 heads stock for stock? I know you'd kinda be downgrading from aluminum heads to cast iron, but technically they're stock heads
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine




Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?

Last edited by Blacdout96; 02-27-2010 at 07:11 AM.
Blacdout96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 07:21 AM   #54
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stupercharged View Post
hey your the one barely in the 12s on a h/c and shot.....
yeah well im the one that went 11.53 with heads/cam a 6spd and a stock bottom end and im telling you its stupid. if you're trying to save money thats one thing but throw a cam in it thats going to like heads later on. youll regret it if you dont
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 12:11 PM   #55
RamAir95TA
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgeport NJ
Posts: 165
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacdout96 View Post
Aren't heads off a police car known to flow better then Camaro LT1 heads stock for stock? I know you'd kinda be downgrading from aluminum heads to cast iron, but technically they're stock heads
The iron heads do flow marginally better, but whatever gains they provide would easily be offset by the added weight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerzLT1 View Post
yeah well im the one that went 11.53 with heads/cam a 6spd and a stock bottom end and im telling you its stupid. if you're trying to save money thats one thing but throw a cam in it thats going to like heads later on. youll regret it if you dont
True story.
__________________
-Joe-
1995 Trans Am
Advanced Induction 383, Performabuilt 4L60E, Ford 9", all motor, daily driven.
10.82 @ 124.25, 1.43 60' 455whp, 445wtq
Clip of 10-second pass.

More info: http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt...damn-time.html
RamAir95TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 08:58 PM   #56
Stupercharged
 
Stupercharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Union NJ
Posts: 246
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerzLT1 View Post
yeah well im the one that went 11.53 with heads/cam a 6spd and a stock bottom end and im telling you its stupid. if you're trying to save money thats one thing but throw a cam in it thats going to like heads later on. youll regret it if you dont
This is just gonna be my cam only go fast set up I already spoke with lloyd elliot and told him the deal and he says its gonna be hard to obtain but it is possible with stock heads, I already have the specs of the cam that he'll make up for me. I just want this motor to run while i build another one.....
__________________
94 Z28 Charcoal Grey Metallic - Engine and Trans Delete Mod.. Light as Hell

07' Saturn Aura - Daily
94' Camaro LSX SWAP someday....- Drive Way Ornament
98' Camaro LS1 M6 - SOLD
98' GTP Forged and saw 14lbs of boost - Grenaded and SOLD
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS View Post
the best ricers to mess with are the ones that have those annoying blue and red lights. they are very persistent, ill give them that...
Stupercharged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 06:13 AM   #57
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
whats gonna be hard to obtain? 11s with stock heads? i went 12.51 stock internals and stock torque converter with minimal weight reduction
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:20 AM   #58
Pampered-Z
Sliderule / Moderator
 
Pampered-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
iTrader: (1)
Sorry, don't understand why everyone is so against putting a bigger cam in the car now?It's been done for years! If the long term plan is to add heads or other upgrades later why advise to buy a small cam that will have little resale vaule and waste money on gaskets etc. Granted your leaving a bit on the table with stock heads, but you can always upgrade them later if desired. What if you go with something like a 305 cam and end up not hitting your goal? Going to put the 305 and go 306?
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada

1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!
Pampered-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 12:20 PM   #59
RamAir95TA
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgeport NJ
Posts: 165
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pampered-Z View Post
Sorry, don't understand why everyone is so against putting a bigger cam in the car now?It's been done for years! If the long term plan is to add heads or other upgrades later why advise to buy a small cam that will have little resale vaule and waste money on gaskets etc. Granted your leaving a bit on the table with stock heads, but you can always upgrade them later if desired. What if you go with something like a 305 cam and end up not hitting your goal? Going to put the 305 and go 306?
The only reason I advise against putting a bigger cam limited by stock heads is because you will have more usable power with a smaller grind. Larger cams diminish low-end power and move the power band much higher in the RPM range, beyond where the stock heads can support. A smaller cam will provide the same gains in the upper RPMs approaching stock head limitation without sacrificing the bottom end. I ran the XE 236/242 for awhile with full bolt-ons and trapped 108mph. Guys with much smaller cams are trapping 110+. Drivability wasn't an issue with that particular cam, but the performance wasn't what I had expected (5 years ago).

But if the OP is planning on doing heads in the future and isn't too concerned with overall performance right now, running a larger cam on stock heads won't hurt anything.

JMHO!
__________________
-Joe-
1995 Trans Am
Advanced Induction 383, Performabuilt 4L60E, Ford 9", all motor, daily driven.
10.82 @ 124.25, 1.43 60' 455whp, 445wtq
Clip of 10-second pass.

More info: http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt...damn-time.html
RamAir95TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:07 PM   #60
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamAir95TA View Post
The only reason I advise against putting a bigger cam limited by stock heads is because you will have more usable power with a smaller grind. Larger cams diminish low-end power and move the power band much higher in the RPM range, beyond where the stock heads can support. A smaller cam will provide the same gains in the upper RPMs approaching stock head limitation without sacrificing the bottom end. I ran the XE 236/242 for awhile with full bolt-ons and trapped 108mph. Guys with much smaller cams are trapping 110+. Drivability wasn't an issue with that particular cam, but the performance wasn't what I had expected (5 years ago).

But if the OP is planning on doing heads in the future and isn't too concerned with overall performance right now, running a larger cam on stock heads won't hurt anything.

JMHO!
i agree, a large cam bring choked off where its supposed to make power isnt going to produce results. the motor is currently apart, im still not seeing the point in rushing it together while the heads are off just to do a cam only build. again, if money is an issue thats one thing but if its not then this just seems like beating your head against a wall.

btw Joe, i trapped 110 with only bolt ons
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:13 PM   #61
RamAir95TA
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgeport NJ
Posts: 165
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerzLT1 View Post
i agree, a large cam bring choked off where its supposed to make power isnt going to produce results. the motor is currently apart, im still not seeing the point in rushing it together while the heads are off just to do a cam only build. again, if money is an issue thats one thing but if its not then this just seems like beating your head against a wall.

btw Joe, i trapped 110 with only bolt ons
110mph with bolt-ons, eh? You do know Atco IS downhill, right?
__________________
-Joe-
1995 Trans Am
Advanced Induction 383, Performabuilt 4L60E, Ford 9", all motor, daily driven.
10.82 @ 124.25, 1.43 60' 455whp, 445wtq
Clip of 10-second pass.

More info: http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt...damn-time.html
RamAir95TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 05:28 PM   #62
transmaro93
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: manchester, NJ
Posts: 1,775
iTrader: (2)
ram air what cam are you running in your t/a... now?
__________________
97 Firebird Formula - 383LT1
15 Subaru WRX - 2.0L-turbo
transmaro93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 05:52 PM   #63
RamAir95TA
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgeport NJ
Posts: 165
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by transmaro93 View Post
ram air what cam are you running in your t/a... now?
It's a relatively small custom-grind AI cam, 23x/24x, around .600" lift on a 108 lobe.
__________________
-Joe-
1995 Trans Am
Advanced Induction 383, Performabuilt 4L60E, Ford 9", all motor, daily driven.
10.82 @ 124.25, 1.43 60' 455whp, 445wtq
Clip of 10-second pass.

More info: http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt...damn-time.html
RamAir95TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 06:13 PM   #64
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamAir95TA View Post
110mph with bolt-ons, eh? You do know Atco IS downhill, right?
with an auto too and if its downhill then i guess you dont reeeeeeeeeally have a 10 second car
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 06:19 PM   #65
transmaro93
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: manchester, NJ
Posts: 1,775
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamAir95TA View Post
It's a relatively small custom-grind AI cam, 23x/24x, around .600" lift on a 108 lobe.
whats the thought behind the low number lsa... thats not that small of a cam.. thats around what im running... i was told any higher than that on a HR i would have trouble making vacuum... your stroked right?
__________________
97 Firebird Formula - 383LT1
15 Subaru WRX - 2.0L-turbo
transmaro93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 06:28 PM   #66
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Joe were going to be running almost the same cam but mine is on a 112 for nitrous. and i have a single plane with LE heads rather than AI
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:35 PM   #67
RamAir95TA
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgeport NJ
Posts: 165
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by transmaro93 View Post
whats the thought behind the low number lsa... thats not that small of a cam.. thats around what im running... i was told any higher than that on a HR i would have trouble making vacuum... your stroked right?
Yes, my motor is stroked to a 383. I have no problems with braking, although I will probably still pick up a reserve canister.

The 108 lobe came recommended by AI for a healthy torque increase, higher cylinder pressures, and a narrower powerband.
__________________
-Joe-
1995 Trans Am
Advanced Induction 383, Performabuilt 4L60E, Ford 9", all motor, daily driven.
10.82 @ 124.25, 1.43 60' 455whp, 445wtq
Clip of 10-second pass.

More info: http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt...damn-time.html
RamAir95TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 06:05 PM   #68
transmaro93
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: manchester, NJ
Posts: 1,775
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamAir95TA View Post
Yes, my motor is stroked to a 383. I have no problems with braking, although I will probably still pick up a reserve canister.

The 108 lobe came recommended by AI for a healthy torque increase, higher cylinder pressures, and a narrower powerband.
ahh gotcha... well my car idleing the brake pedel is rock hard.. i dont know if its a vacuum issue or because of the abs delete yet... ill see how it performs on the road once i register it again
__________________
97 Firebird Formula - 383LT1
15 Subaru WRX - 2.0L-turbo
transmaro93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.