Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Transmission and Driveline

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2010, 12:25 PM   #1
mc73nova
 
mc73nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: under a roof
Posts: 2,034
iTrader: (4)
10 Bolts - Discuss

Dont tell me Im an idiot. I am asking because I personally dont know the answer and I am curious.
The rears that are in F-Bodies from 82-02 are said to be terrible for withstanding even stock abuse. Which I believe from all the horror stories I have read.
Is there no way to use a 8.5 10 bolt from older GM's? Is it that difficult to get it to work on these type of vehicles?
There are a bunch of racers including myself running a 8.5 10 bolt housing with the tubes welded and have aftermarket high performance guts in them running deep in the 10's. Why cant you guys do this?

Obviously if I new the answer, I would not have posted this.
__________________
1973 Chevy Nova - best e.t.-10.04 - currently disassembled
1989 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
2016 Dodge Durango R/T
2015 Ram 3500 Dually Cummins
mc73nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:17 PM   #2
Slow-V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
iTrader: (10)
The problem is the TQ arm mount. I am sure you could fab up a TQ arm mount on a 8.5 and might be able to use it but there are better alternatives out there. They installed 9 bolt rears on certain Z28's and GTA T/A's in the 80's and early 90's but they are expensive to upgrade if you wanted a different gear. They are stronger then the 10 bolts and will bolt right into a 3rd and 4th gen. Other options are 12 bolt and 9 inch rears and also the Ford 8.8 rears are being converted into F-body rear ends.

You can also roll the dice and build a 10bolt and pray it doesnt break like I did!!
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
Slow-V6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 02:11 PM   #3
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,149
iTrader: (27)
Another issue: i think 4th gen rears are a bit wider than most 8.5" applications. There are a few firms that are making torque arm setups for older cars (BMR maybe?) so maybe they have a way around the t/a issue

I can't see any of it being cost effective as just buying one that is made for the car.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 02:21 PM   #4
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mc73nova View Post
Dont tell me Im an idiot. I am asking because I personally dont know the answer and I am curious.
The rears that are in F-Bodies from 82-02 are said to be terrible for withstanding even stock abuse. Which I believe from all the horror stories I have read.
Is there no way to use a 8.5 10 bolt from older GM's? Is it that difficult to get it to work on these type of vehicles?
There are a bunch of racers including myself running a 8.5 10 bolt housing with the tubes welded and have aftermarket high performance guts in them running deep in the 10's. Why cant you guys do this?

Obviously if I new the answer, I would not have posted this.
Yeah, I think Kurt Urban was running in the 8's on a 8.5" 10 bolt a few years back with no issue.

Besides the torque arm mount, everything is on a small scale. The ring gear, the carrier, etc. The 7.5 was originally designed for a Vega. A light, 4cyl, compact car. Not a heavy powerful car like a 4th gen.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 03:07 PM   #5
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,341
iTrader: (12)
could do a 4 link to bypass the torque arm, no?
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 05:35 PM   #6
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,077
iTrader: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider View Post
could do a 4 link to bypass the torque arm, no?
now you got me thinking, my bird race car... may be an idea... i wonder if the width of the lower LCA are the same distance apart in g body and f body cars. if so, then you only need to fab up upper mount for aftermarket adjustable g body upper rear control arms which are at a small angle off the diff. hmmm....
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 02:56 PM   #7
Slow-V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS View Post
now you got me thinking, my bird race car... may be an idea... i wonder if the width of the lower LCA are the same distance apart in g body and f body cars. if so, then you only need to fab up upper mount for aftermarket adjustable g body upper rear control arms which are at a small angle off the diff. hmmm....
What is better having upper and lower control arms or moving the TQ arm off the tranny to the body? Thats what I always wondered.
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
Slow-V6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 03:03 PM   #8
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow-V6 View Post
What is better having upper and lower control arms or moving the TQ arm off the tranny to the body? Thats what I always wondered.
Not sure if one is really "better" more than they are just different.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 03:12 PM   #9
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,077
iTrader: (12)
well i havent had a trans mounted TQ arm in a long time. i tore my stock oem tq arm years back with my stock motor setup, on the street, with street tires during a 1-2 shift. since then i have had a chassis mounted tq arm. car felt so much nicer afterwards, trans didnt rise and fall every time i got on or off the gas pedal, lol.

but now, i will seriously be looking into putting a stock-ish 8.5 10bolt in the bird with upper control arms. basically all i need is the section of a g body frame crossmember, and fab it in. In the bird, the gas tank will be getting taken out in favor of a fuel cell anyway so welding in a custom crossmember with bracing is a real possibility.

Last edited by V; 02-26-2010 at 03:13 PM.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 03:52 PM   #10
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,149
iTrader: (27)
An 8.5" rear can be as strong as a 12 bolt. Trucks have 8.5" rings and 30 spline axles. Watch your width. Measure. Speedway motors will have a lot of the stuff you need to fab. Although in the long run you may gain nothing or even go backwards if you don't do it right. A torque arm setup is not a bad thing.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 07:27 PM   #11
JSPERFORMANCE
NJFBOA Supporting Sponsor
 
JSPERFORMANCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: HULMEVILLE, PA
Posts: 2,023
iTrader: (4)
Social Networks:

if you want to go that route you are better off using a mustang 8.8 and a Battle Box for a fox body. Remember, some of the fastest drag radial cars in the world have a torque arm some of them are even mustangs. Torque arms just plain work.
__________________
JSSPEEDANDCUSTOM.COM
JSPERFORMANCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 09:05 PM   #12
mc73nova
 
mc73nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: under a roof
Posts: 2,034
iTrader: (4)
I wasnt saying to alter the suspension, just to see if you can fab the stuff on to an 8.5. I believe in the suspension/torque arm set-up, my brother never had a problem hooking in his car. The Drag Radial class is doing amazing things on stock style suspension.
__________________
1973 Chevy Nova - best e.t.-10.04 - currently disassembled
1989 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
2016 Dodge Durango R/T
2015 Ram 3500 Dually Cummins
mc73nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 08:35 PM   #13
1984camaroz28
 
1984camaroz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orange County NY
Posts: 579
iTrader: (6)
The biggest Problem is the TQ arm mount.... By the time u find a rear and buy all the brackets/ fab up what you need your not to far behind a moser 12 bolt or 9in
__________________
2000 Camaro 25.5 Turbo car X275
1984camaroz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 07:52 PM   #14
Mark42
 
Mark42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 443
iTrader: (0)
How about using a pair of ladder bars to install the rear of choice instead of fabbing up a torque arm mount? Ladder bars are strong, and basically are short versions of a torque arm. Just weld them up.

__________________

1998 Firebird Coupe
Mods: 3.73 Gears, Eaton TrueTrac, PCM Tune, LS1 Aluminum Drive Shaft, Cold Air Intake, 180 Thermostat, Magnaflow Cat-Back Exhaust, Moog LCA busings.

My Firebird Projects
: Click Here

Mark42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 10:37 AM   #15
creeper
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 817
iTrader: (3)
"pete z" bars might make things a little easier
__________________

|2000 Trans Am|T56 swap|Bolt Ons| Suspension|
creeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 11:06 AM   #16
Mike
BadMod
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
iTrader: (17)
ladder bars will prevent the car from being allowed to run in any stock suspension classes if that is a consideration.
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva View Post
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 05:41 PM   #17
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,473
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by creeper View Post
"pete z" bars might make things a little easier
Yes, they would - but as mike pointed out, they would also keep you out of any stock style suspension racing.

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Transmission and Driveline


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.