Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-21-2004, 12:43 AM   #1
bokey
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hamilton Square
Posts: 252
iTrader: (0)
V6 Headers

Does anybody know where I can find a place who makes long tube headers for 189 cui (3.1L) block? I think the 3.1 is the same as the 2.8 just bored out (30 over I think) so if the headers fit a 2.8, i'm pretty sure they will bolt up to my 3.1

Thanks for your help
bokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 12:48 AM   #2
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
just outa curiosity, how come your putting a bunch of money into your 3.1? why not just save for a 350?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 07:00 AM   #3
Little G
Lifetime Power Member
 
Little G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 862
iTrader: (0)
'cause they said it couldn't be done
__________________
2008 Mysterious Solstice GXP - teh hotness!
2002 Pewter V6 Camaro M5 ~ SOLD
mods: Gear, weight reduction, tuning
Fear the Gear. 13.585 @ 100.05 1.827
Beater: 93 Jeep Grand Cherokee

Little G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 08:51 AM   #4
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
yah but they are slow no matter how you cut it.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 09:24 AM   #5
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,473
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little G
'cause they said it couldn't be done


I don't think there are long tubes out there for the rwd 60degree v6's, but I know that pacesetter make's headers for them.

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 04:32 PM   #6
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86Formula
just outa curiosity, how come your putting a bunch of money into your 3.1? why not just save for a 350?
V8 swaps are waaayyyy more costly than you woudl think. especially if you intend to stay emissions friendly.
a few well choosen bolt ons can make a world of diffrence in a cars performance. jsut look at little g's ride, started otu runnign 16's. a few good decisions later it is on the brink of 13's.

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 04:34 PM   #7
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
an 02 v6 camaro is a far better starting point then the lowly 3.1's offered in the early 90's and late 80's putting down probably close to 50 more hp off the showroom floor.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 04:38 PM   #8
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
that just makes the gains of gearing and tunign even more evident at the end of the day.
besides, y9ou can't go wrong with good chassis and suspension prep. if at any point he does decide to do a V8 or different V6 the car will already be prepared for it.

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 05:08 PM   #9
z2815
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: piscataway nj
Posts: 34
iTrader: (0)
you could always put a grand national engine in it
__________________
black ninty three z28 6speed.
some mods

seventy nine camaro 400 chevy sb th350
some mods
z2815 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 06:52 PM   #10
9secfirebird
 
9secfirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 365
iTrader: (0)
no, grand nat engine is a worse swap than a 350

nothing wrong with a 2.8 - i had one in the 15s at one point, then i killed it, it was a tiard motor


need any help with anything 2.8/3.1/3.4 related let me know, i got a ton of ideas i can throw at you

blacktoprecs is my AIM
__________________
AIM: blacktoprecs
9secfirebird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 10:37 PM   #11
bokey
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hamilton Square
Posts: 252
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little G
'cause they said it couldn't be done
It will be done ... come to find out they don't make long tube headers and i know about pace setter ... but I think i'm going to switch out the rear end first to a posi ... they did say that it couldn't be done, but it will be ... trust me it will ... the 350 swap would be ncie BUT, i need new breaking system ... new trans ... new suspension ... etc. and i dn't have the money for that ... i'm probally going to build another V6 from the gound up beefed up ... i have no idea what my car would run right now ... but i'm sure it wouldn't be too bad as soon as i can ... i'll take it down to the track and get it timed i'll let you know how it goes (i'm thinking 16's at maybe 90-95 mph)
^too much to ask for?
bokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 11:39 PM   #12
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,077
iTrader: (12)
well if you're interested in building a v6 from the ground up. how about a 3.4l engine w/auto trans. im selling it out of my 94 firebird, including all accesories, harness, and ecm... 300 bucks for all that. just a thought...
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 12:50 AM   #13
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
if your stickin with a V6 i agree that a GN engine would be your best bet if your lookin for someone to get the engine/tranny and install, just let me know and ill give ya a number
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 09:47 AM   #14
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,473
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by bokey
i have no idea what my car would run right now ... but i'm sure it wouldn't be too bad as soon as i can ... i'll take it down to the track and get it timed i'll let you know how it goes (i'm thinking 16's at maybe 90-95 mph)
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* ^too much to ask for?
Yea, way to much to ask out of a stock, or close to stock 3.1. The motor was rated at 140 hp and 170 ft-lbs of torque (Exact same specs as the 3.1 in my '91 Lumina).

The Lumina (with the only mods being !jack, !spare, and hacked airbox) ran a 17.4 @ 78.xx. If your car is running well, I would expect around a 17.1 or 17.2 @ 80ish mph.

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 12:27 PM   #15
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,077
iTrader: (12)
yeah. i agree with justin, stock around 17.0 at best, trapping around 80. 90-95 mph traps should be around 15.2 give or take. my 95 caddy STS bone stock trapped 97mph, at 14.8
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 12:54 PM   #16
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,473
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS
my 95 caddy STS bone stock trapped 97mph, at 14.8
Wow....talk about a top-end charge!

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 04:11 PM   #17
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bokey
but I think i'm going to switch out the rear end first to a posi
give that puppy some gear and watch the et's fall.
stock you most likely have 3.42's, 3.73's woudl be a little better, 4.10's would be good for ya, and 4.56's would get the job done hehe
honestly, 4.10's are a good all around gear for most V6 cars. you will see a huge gain in performance without a negative effect on your gas mileage, slight if any effect on mileage at all.
add a mild torque convertor when you rebuild teh tranny and you will really see a huge improvement.

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.