Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Electrical and Wiring

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-24-2009, 02:42 PM   #1
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
ATTN: T56 swappers...VSS code 24

So I did the T56 swap and I tuned out my automatic transmission but I'm still throwing a code for VSS. After further research I see that not only does the VSS work with the trans but also the IAC. My idle sucks, is there anyway to bypass the VSS or do I need to pick up one of those Dakota Digital SGI boxes?
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 03:04 PM   #2
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
no way you can find out how the IAC is integrated with the vss and wire accordingly?
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 03:10 PM   #3
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
I probably could but I heard the VSS wires from the T56 and the 700R4 give off different signals so it wouldn't read correctly.
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 03:25 PM   #4
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,149
iTrader: (27)
I asked you this before you started!!! It's related because the ECM is confused on how fast you are going now!

I do believe the later VSSs send a different signal (IIRC # of pulses changes), although I'd have to go research the detail, so I'll leave that to you.

http://www.jagsthatrun.com/V8-chapte...ed-Sensors.pdf

http://www.skulte.com/T56.html
The f-body T56 has a 17 pulse per driveshaft revolution VSS signal generator in the tailshaft. This has to get converted to a 4000 (or 2000) pulse per mile signal for your VSS buffer input. The easiest way is to purchase the Dakota Digital SGI-5 signal recalibration box to do this. This is just spliced in between the transmission and chassis wiring. I also put together an Excel spreadsheet to calculate the VSS divisor ratio if you are so inclined.


Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
no way you can find out how the IAC is integrated with the vss and wire accordingly?
Really? Argh. Stop posting in tech.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 04:25 PM   #5
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Is this for TPI? If so your car will never get out of cell 4 without the VSS, ask me how I know.....
TPI HAS to have VSS to work properly

Last edited by PolarBear; 06-24-2009 at 04:26 PM.
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 04:55 PM   #6
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
I asked you this before you started!!! It's related because the ECM is confused on how fast you are going now!

I do believe the later VSSs send a different signal (IIRC # of pulses changes), although I'd have to go research the detail, so I'll leave that to you.

http://www.jagsthatrun.com/V8-chapte...ed-Sensors.pdf

http://www.skulte.com/T56.html
The f-body T56 has a 17 pulse per driveshaft revolution VSS signal generator in the tailshaft. This has to get converted to a 4000 (or 2000) pulse per mile signal for your VSS buffer input. The easiest way is to purchase the Dakota Digital SGI-5 signal recalibration box to do this. This is just spliced in between the transmission and chassis wiring. I also put together an Excel spreadsheet to calculate the VSS divisor ratio if you are so inclined.


Really? Argh. Stop posting in tech.



i was asking for my own references for the fact that i was a little iffy on how the vss operated. christ. cant ask a question because mr bonzo is gonna have a breakdown and cry about it.


fyi your explanation was exactly the answer to the question i wanted to know
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 05:21 PM   #7
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
I asked you this before you started!!! It's related because the ECM is confused on how fast you are going now!

I do believe the later VSSs send a different signal (IIRC # of pulses changes), although I'd have to go research the detail, so I'll leave that to you.

http://www.jagsthatrun.com/V8-chapte...ed-Sensors.pdf

http://www.skulte.com/T56.html
The f-body T56 has a 17 pulse per driveshaft revolution VSS signal generator in the tailshaft. This has to get converted to a 4000 (or 2000) pulse per mile signal for your VSS buffer input. The easiest way is to purchase the Dakota Digital SGI-5 signal recalibration box to do this. This is just spliced in between the transmission and chassis wiring. I also put together an Excel spreadsheet to calculate the VSS divisor ratio if you are so inclined.


Really? Argh. Stop posting in tech.


Like mentioned above, I didn't realize the VSS controlled other things other than the tq converter lockup. Also because my car has a mechanical speedometer. Now I understand, guess I gotta spend another $100 or so...ugh lol

And Scooter, the car is TPI
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 12:20 PM   #8
Fast92RS
Power Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
iTrader: (13)
Just get a new tune. The prom you have will never work correctly with your swap. Even if you convert the signal. You need to get a reprogram. The iac and other things are programmed differenlty to work with manual vs auto. Check out the diy prom section on thirdgen.org.
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL1
https://kraeserepairs.com
Fast92RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 03:28 PM   #9
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast92RS View Post
Just get a new tune. The prom you have will never work correctly with your swap. Even if you convert the signal. You need to get a reprogram. The iac and other things are programmed differenlty to work with manual vs auto. Check out the diy prom section on thirdgen.org.



i thin it was a 5 speed before he put it in fyi
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 03:58 PM   #10
Featherburner
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arm pit of the world... NJ
Posts: 2,673
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
i thin it was a 5 speed before he put it in fyi
No.
__________________
John
Featherburner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 06:53 PM   #11
Anti_Rice_Guy
The Mayor / 2009 Member of the Year / Moderator
 
Anti_Rice_Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northwest
Posts: 8,859
iTrader: (1)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
i thin it was a 5 speed before he put it in fyi
His point was valid. He went from an auto to manual...
__________________
1995 Z28 Convertible A4 13.78 @ 100 (CAI, high flow cat, catback, 160 thermo, hypertech, Strano springs, Koni yellows, sway bars, 3 pt. UMI SFC)
2018 Sea Doo GTX - 3 cylinders and das boooooost
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Is English your 2nd language? Did you graduate high school? Your posts make my head hurt.
Team FARM
Anti_Rice_Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 08:00 PM   #12
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast92RS View Post
Just get a new tune. The prom you have will never work correctly with your swap. Even if you convert the signal. You need to get a reprogram. The iac and other things are programmed differenlty to work with manual vs auto. Check out the diy prom section on thirdgen.org.
Everywhere I read different info pops up for this swap lol I just made a post over there so we'll see what's up. carburetors keep sounding better and better...




Nasty, I went from Auto to manual
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 09:02 PM   #13
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,149
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teds89IROC View Post
...carburetors keep sounding better and better...
Don't take the easy way out! Man up!
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 09:48 PM   #14
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Don't take the easy way out! Man up!
The more I do to the car the better it sounds


So after more research I'm finding that the pre-90 camaros without the electric speedometer etc have a buffer box which takes the signal from the IAC to the ECM. The Dakota box basically bypasses this buffer box feeding the correct signal to the ECM. When I convert to an electric speedometer it will be read from this box. Changing just the Flag/Switch in TunerPro from Auto to manaul should bypass most of the issues, the only thing that might still remain is highway mode etc. which is just relative to gas mileage. Right now in 6th gear doing about 80 I'm at 1600 rpm's so how much gas mileage can I be losing
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 09:53 PM   #15
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast92RS View Post
Just get a new tune. The prom you have will never work correctly with your swap. Even if you convert the signal. You need to get a reprogram. The iac and other things are programmed differenlty to work with manual vs auto. Check out the diy prom section on thirdgen.org.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teds89IROC View Post
Changing just the Flag/Switch in TunerPro from Auto to manaul should bypass most of the issues, the only thing that might still remain is highway mode etc.
No you are still going to have problems with your car not learning properly. As Fast92RS states you need a new tune. I suggest buying a prom for a manual car and go from there.

Last edited by PolarBear; 06-29-2009 at 09:54 PM.
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 10:04 PM   #16
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
No you are still going to have problems with your car not learning properly. As Fast92RS states you need a new tune. I suggest buying a prom for a manual car and go from there.

What I can't find a clear answer on is why, what exactly are the differences? A chip for a manual car is more work because that involves changing fuel tables and a few other things I've read whereas this is just IAC. And again, I'm not going to pay someone to reprogram the chip when I have everything I need to do it myself; the problem is I don't know what to change.
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 10:08 PM   #17
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teds89IROC View Post
What I can't find a clear answer on is why, what exactly are the differences? A chip for a manual car is more work because that involves changing fuel tables and a few other things I've read whereas this is just IAC. And again, I'm not going to pay someone to reprogram the chip when I have everything I need to do it myself; the problem is I don't know what to change.
Well you are in a bit of a pickle there then. You really NEED to have the manual chip or your car wont run at its full potential. I dont know the differences because I dont look into code but I know it doesnt really "work" right after a conversion without the proper chip, or programming. I think the car wont come out of cell 4 because of this.
If you have and AutoProm and chip adapter then you just need to burn a new one. You can just copy the tables and paste them into the new burn.
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 10:27 PM   #18
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
I guess what I'm having trouble understanding is that if the car works with the automatic VSS feeding the ECM then in turn the IAC etc and I switch transmissions and basically replace the stock buffer box with the Dakota box converting the new VSS signal to the ECM, what has changed? I'm guessing the VSS signal and pulses are relative to what gear I'm in based on revolutions and since the 700R4 isn't electric then what is the difference there also? If my only option is to have someone do it then fine but I want to at least know what needs to be done and why before I jump into it or just give up.
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 07:20 AM   #19
JL8Jeff
Hippy Mod, Bergermeister Meisterberger, Moderator
 
JL8Jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ewing
Posts: 6,212
iTrader: (3)
The automatic setup might be using the torque converter lockup signal for something that the manual doesn't need when doing fuel table calculations. I've never looked into the programming deep enough to understand what's really going on in the PCM.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8 4 wheel disc brakes - being restored
09 Silverado Z71
JL8Jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 04:01 PM   #20
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teds89IROC View Post
I guess what I'm having trouble understanding is that if the car works with the automatic VSS feeding the ECM then in turn the IAC etc and I switch transmissions and basically replace the stock buffer box with the Dakota box converting the new VSS signal to the ECM, what has changed? I'm guessing the VSS signal and pulses are relative to what gear I'm in based on revolutions and since the 700R4 isn't electric then what is the difference there also? If my only option is to have someone do it then fine but I want to at least know what needs to be done and why before I jump into it or just give up.
Lets just say this: if you leave the auto chip in the car with the manual trans you are going to throw codes. I did it for a little while and had some problems.....
You have the stuff to fix yourself, I told you what to do... and Fast too. Just re-burn the chip with the appropriate .BIN and then copy your fuel and spark tables over
Why are you still debating the issue?
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 07:50 PM   #21
Kat
11 Second Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 932
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teds89IROC View Post
The more I do to the car the better it sounds


So after more research I'm finding that the pre-90 camaros without the electric speedometer etc have a buffer box which takes the signal from the IAC to the ECM. The Dakota box basically bypasses this buffer box feeding the correct signal to the ECM. When I convert to an electric speedometer it will be read from this box. Changing just the Flag/Switch in TunerPro from Auto to manaul should bypass most of the issues, the only thing that might still remain is highway mode etc. which is just relative to gas mileage. Right now in 6th gear doing about 80 I'm at 1600 rpm's so how much gas mileage can I be losing
First off TPI cars didnt have a buffer box. Only TBI cars and firebirds with the electic speedo.

You need the SGI box to feed the ECM a VSS signal since you dont have a "working" mechanical speedo anymore. Since the VSS is on the back of the instrument cluster. I do beleieve that Jagsthatrun.com has a T56 tail section with a mechanical speedo cable hook up for it that will allow you the use of you stock setup. The only downfall to this is that tail section is about 300 dollars

Scooter BLM cell stuff is for 90-92 cars.

The reason why you need a manual bin is on how the ECM controls the IAC in a/dcell and idle. Start with the ARAP.bin (AYPY.bin is the same as the arap but for the auto.. I could be backwards as it has been a few years since I've mess with the 165 ecm).

Use the compare feature in tunerpro to see what changes were made to the chip that you had done at JS. (or swing by when I get back from Hawaii and I'll be more than happy to set ya up!) Do the injector constant, fan temps and the usual **** for what you have for your car.

Re do the min idle/TPS settings on the throttle body after you have the manual bin loaded. Rember auto cars can idle lower due to the greater rotational mass hanging off the back of the crank. I had that problem when I had my old 89 iroc.

The VSS does not directly control the IAC at all. CTS, TPS, LV8 and more so VSS controls it. It takes all of the inputs from the sensors to decide on what to do with the IAC. Weither you are in acell and it will be using the IAC for the throttle follower feature( when you let off the gas and the engine drops right back to the idle setting instead it slows the drop). etc...

VSS signal is constant. X amount of pluses per revolution of the DS. The faster the ECM is getting them, the faster you are going. Yes it is that friggin simple.


I think that about covers it.
__________________
2004 GTO GMM shifter Spohn stuff, tint and my love......
1988 Camaro Vert -Sold

Last edited by Kat; 06-30-2009 at 07:52 PM.
Kat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 08:06 PM   #22
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
That's what I have been trying to find...thank you!
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 08:30 AM   #23
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat View Post
Scooter BLM cell stuff is for 90-92 cars.
I never messed with the 165 stuff, thanks
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 10:45 AM   #24
Fast92RS
Power Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
iTrader: (13)
Thats some good info. Ive been olny tuning my car to work with my new set up. I have speed density TPI set up and its pretty easy to tune.
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL1
https://kraeserepairs.com

Last edited by Fast92RS; 07-01-2009 at 10:45 AM.
Fast92RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 03:17 PM   #25
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast92RS View Post
I have speed density TPI set up and its pretty easy to tune.
Me too and I have no idea what the hell I am doing. I tried a few times, got frustrated and havent touched it since. I also got pissed at it because people on TGO.org dont really help when you ask questions
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Electrical and Wiring


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.