|
02-20-2005, 11:20 AM
|
#1
|
14 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: RUM$ON, NJ
Posts: 2,308
|
Getting rid of the TBI once and for all
I posted this over at TGO once, but all I did was get aholes writing back (what else is new). Anyways. Is there ANYWAY to get rid of TBI, but keep the stock fuel pump? Id rather not drop the tank if needed. Could I just get an inline regulator and put it before the carb? I heard that since the fuel isnt always running through the pump this might make the pump overheat. But since its submerged in fuel, I figured it should be Ok. Has anyone actually done the conversion and mind lending a hand one weekend (when its warmer)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fapist
K0ll is a hick and has a veritable fleet of 1980-early 90's GM vehicles :mullet:
|
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 12:41 PM
|
#2
|
11 second club / Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
|
You would be fine using the stock pump.
Did you read this article on TGO ..... i know its no thte greatest because most of those tech pages suck ass ... but its a start.
http://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/carbswap.shtml
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57
1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 12:43 PM
|
#3
|
14 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: RUM$ON, NJ
Posts: 2,308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadtrend1
|
Yeah. About 3 times. It seems like he wrote it out a lot more complicated than it is... Take off manifold, TBI. Put on new manifold, carb, and dist. Then just wire up certain wires for the converter lock up to a switch.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fapist
K0ll is a hick and has a veritable fleet of 1980-early 90's GM vehicles :mullet:
|
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 01:48 PM
|
#4
|
11 second club / Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
|
Yea, its not all that complicated as many make it to be.
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57
1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 04:16 PM
|
#5
|
NJFBOA Co-Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
|
is there a particular reason you feel you need to ditch the tbi? there is a ton of performance potential in it as well as reliability and mileage to be had.
the easiest answer to the removal is get an intake and carb and a presure regulator. you can go to the junkyard and get an older style weights and vacuum advance HEI distributor and pull the computer all together.
if you are worried about inspection you can switch to an old style controller on your EGR as well.
later
tim
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 04:43 PM
|
#6
|
11 second club / Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
....and pull the computer all together.
|
Wont that screw up his VATS?
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57
1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 05:28 PM
|
#7
|
14 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: RUM$ON, NJ
Posts: 2,308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
is there a particular reason you feel you need to ditch the tbi? there is a ton of performance potential in it as well as reliability and mileage to be had.
the easiest answer to the removal is get an intake and carb and a presure regulator. you can go to the junkyard and get an older style weights and vacuum advance HEI distributor and pull the computer all together.
if you are worried about inspection you can switch to an old style controller on your EGR as well.
later
tim
|
I evuntally want to remove the computer all together. I just dont like TBI. Have grown up on carbs so I am partial to them (and I have a few VA HEIs around)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fapist
K0ll is a hick and has a veritable fleet of 1980-early 90's GM vehicles :mullet:
|
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 07:18 PM
|
#8
|
NJFBOA Co-Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadtrend1
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
....and pull the computer all together.
|
Wont that screw up his VATS?
|
to beat the vats all you have to do is rewire it skipping the vats controller.
later
tim
|
|
|
02-20-2005, 08:34 PM
|
#9
|
12 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oradell
Posts: 8,368
|
88 camaros dont have VATS, only 89+ firebirds and i think 90+ camaros
__________________
86 Camaro
88 Camaro
95 Impala SS
97 Trans Am WS6
98 Blazer ZR2
00 Corvette
04 CTS-V
07 Sublime Charger Daytona
10 Tahoe SSV
12 Tahoe LT
17 Malibu LT
|
|
|
02-22-2005, 12:56 PM
|
#10
|
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fishkill, NY
Posts: 1,278
|
88 firebirds have VATS.
__________________
-Nick
9/11/01- Never Forget
2002 Pontiac Trans-Am WS6 # 206
Chasing 10's
469RWH/437RWTQ
11.05 @ 123
|
|
|
02-23-2005, 05:20 PM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: EWING, N.J
Posts: 433
|
horray for carburetion !!!
__________________
Im the person your mother warned you about
|
|
|
02-23-2005, 05:26 PM
|
#12
|
11 second club / Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVIL90SS
horray for carburetion !!!
|
BOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
J/k ....
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57
1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|