NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds

NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/index.php)
-   The Later Years 93-present (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   BlackbirdWS6's Blown 1997 Firebird TA WS6 Convertible 6spd (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/showthread.php?t=58424)

LTb1ow 03-04-2014 12:26 PM

As I have said before, you should see way less boost than me and out do me WHP wise, so once those pistons seal up nicely... dis gun b good.

140+ traps?

PolarBear 03-04-2014 12:37 PM

12/14

Blackbirdws6 03-04-2014 12:40 PM

Interesting guesses. I'm debating on who I want to retune the car. RPM would likely cut me a deal but they are far away and I wasn't pleased how they handled a friends car. TTP is on my list but I will cry a bit since they use a mustang dyno so lower numbers may be a result. I could always jump on a dynojet later to see the difference though. I would just like an apples to apples comparison though.

Matt - Why would I see less boost with a better ring seal? 140 traps may be possibru especially if I may some more power, drive the car better and drop a lil weight.

LTb1ow 03-04-2014 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackbirdws6 (Post 901021)
Interesting guesses. I'm debating on who I want to retune the car. RPM would likely cut me a deal but they are far away and I wasn't pleased how they handled a friends car. TTP is on my list but I will cry a bit since they use a mustang dyno so lower numbers may be a result. I could always jump on a dynojet later to see the difference though. I would just like an apples to apples comparison though.

Matt - Why would I see less boost with a better ring seal? 140 traps may be possibru especially if I may some more power, drive the car better and drop a lil weight.

I am saying with your much better flowing heads your X psi will be a much higher power rating from the much higher flow than my X psi and ****** flow. So my hope is that you will need less psi to make the same if not more power than you did previously. So assuming the crappy ring seal was killing you, that pullied 20psi will net you higher gains this time round.

lulz, round.

Paul Huryk 03-04-2014 03:58 PM

In theory, better ring seal (with no other changes) will give you slightly more power and definitely control the oil 10x better (or more). Boost might change slightly - maybe 1/2 psi or less.

But changing the cam profile will either let more air into the heads (lowering boost slightly), or it may even stay the same - with no other changes. You might also have more bleed off with a larger cam.

Not like I'm an expert, but I'll guess 760/695 as your number.

Blackbirdws6 03-04-2014 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTb1ow (Post 901024)
I am saying with your much better flowing heads your X psi will be a much higher power rating from the much higher flow than my X psi and ****** flow. So my hope is that you will need less psi to make the same if not more power than you did previously. So assuming the crappy ring seal was killing you, that pullied 20psi will net you higher gains this time round.

lulz, round.

That made more sense. I agree the ring seal will contain more of the "bang" than before. Maybe I will actually put this bottom end to the test.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Huryk (Post 901032)
In theory, better ring seal (with no other changes) will give you slightly more power and definitely control the oil 10x better (or more). Boost might change slightly - maybe 1/2 psi or less.

But changing the cam profile will either let more air into the heads (lowering boost slightly), or it may even stay the same - with no other changes. You might also have more bleed off with a larger cam.

Not like I'm an expert, but I'll guess 760/695 as your number.

The cam lift is actually rather similar. It is going from a 224/236 115 to a 229/239 112. Lloyd was spot on with his cam spec before so while he says I might lose a bit down low, I should make it up considerably up top. After I informed him of the ring sealing problem, his comments were more definitive in gaining power all across the board.

sweetbmxrider 03-04-2014 05:44 PM

What everyone is forgetting is that the piston was contacting about 37% of the surface area in the bore (I rounded, shoot me) and that the increased friction of a circular bore will thus slow the piston's travel time down considerably. This, as obvious as it sounds, will slow the car down significantly. Sure, you might gain a +5hp per circular bore but you will slow the rotating assembly which is never a good thing.

Blackbirdws6 03-04-2014 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider (Post 901038)
What everyone is forgetting is that the piston was contacting about 37% of the surface area in the bore (I rounded, shoot me) and that the increased friction of a circular bore will thus slow the piston's travel time down considerably. This, as obvious as it sounds, will slow the car down significantly. Sure, you might gain a +5hp per circular bore but you will slow the rotating assembly which is never a good thing.

Interesting thoughts. I'm still a bit amazed the pistons looked as good they did.

Paul Huryk 03-04-2014 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider (Post 901038)
What everyone is forgetting is that the piston was contacting about 37% of the surface area in the bore (I rounded, shoot me) and that the increased friction of a circular bore will thus slow the piston's travel time down considerably. This, as obvious as it sounds, will slow the car down significantly. Sure, you might gain a +5hp per circular bore but you will slow the rotating assembly which is never a good thing.

There is always a tradeoff. For instance the V10 in the LFA is the fastest revving motor in a production car. But for it's size and number of pistons, it's volumetric efficiency is down 5 or 6% compared to the 458 Italia's 8 cylinder and even a really nice 570hp H/C/I LS3.

My point is that being able to rev fast is not be all end all. Now if Brian's engine picks up 40hp just from the improved ring sealing, it will easily overcome the increase in friction - at least in 3rd gear and above. Couple that with a little better breathing from the updated cam profile and (maybe) some more boost, no contest...

A 383 with 20lbs of boost doesn't need to rev like a banshee to move the car - area under the curve does that on its own. Amen

sweetbmxrider 03-05-2014 07:21 AM

I was kinda kidding :lol:

Paul Huryk 03-05-2014 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider (Post 901068)
I was kinda kidding :lol:

LOL

Didn't think you were...

PolarBear 03-05-2014 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Huryk (Post 901079)
LOL

Didn't think you were...

When it is Pal to Pal conversing, they are usually Shenz'ing

Blackbirdws6 03-17-2014 01:50 PM

More progress this weekend which included:

- Filled trans with oil
- Mounted a/c compressor, belt tensioner
- Installed new header collector gaskets and resealed y-pipe connection
- New custom front brake lines installed - Courtesy of Adam
- Vacuum line and other accessory connections made/ Fittings tightened / Things hid - Courtesy of Matt
- Cooling system plumbed
- Wiring harness run and all connections made sans a couple items
- Silly 4" 120 deg blower inlet mounted


What's left:
- Connect fuel lines to rail (bought new clips for safety which should be here in a couple days)
- Install brake master, fill will fluid, checks for leaks and bleed
- Extend the Hobbs switch wire from passenger to drivers side
- Finish blower intake
- Reconnect ground and power wires
- Connect charge pipes from blower to intercooler
- Mount new catch-can and run hoses
- Re-install rad fans
- Reconnect methanol lines
- Install battery
- Check all connections (Vacuum, wiring, etc)
- Prep fire extinguisher and bake depression brownies

A couple quick engine shots. Matt did a great job cleaning things up. It's still busy but it looks worlds better than it did before.

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w...psowrbdebf.jpg

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w...psjm2jxopm.jpg

Not a great pic but Adam did a great job with the lines. The K can now be dropped (I hope not) without having to remove the brake lines.
http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w...ps7qa3alcr.jpg

transmaro93 03-17-2014 09:01 PM

looken good... im forever jelous of your engine bay neatness

Blackbirdws6 03-17-2014 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by transmaro93 (Post 901913)
looken good... im forever jelous of your engine bay neatness

Thanks man. Still feels like 10lbs of **** being stuffed into a 5 lb bag but doing the best with the room available.

LTb1ow 03-18-2014 06:56 AM

Neatness is not the word I would use.

Overflowing would work, or stuffed to the brim.

Blackbirdws6 03-18-2014 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTb1ow (Post 901933)
Neatness is not the word I would use.

Overflowing would work, or stuffed to the brim.

Maybe purposeful? By the way, I suppose I need to double check to make sure the right injector wire went to the correct injector?

Forgot to add to the list:

- Install serp belt and blower belt. Tighten to provide banjo string tension.

LTb1ow 03-18-2014 11:27 AM

Oh yes, check those injectors.

You wanted a 3/4 swap right?

Blackbirdws6 03-18-2014 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTb1ow (Post 901944)
Oh yes, check those injectors.

You wanted a 3/4 swap right?

Guess I better make a checklist to check the checklist. I tried to connect the fuel lines late on Sunday and noticed they didn't want to click in easily. I got one to click (or so I thought) and when I jiggled it, the line popped off.

I ordered new plastic clips but should the piece be inserted into the fuel line prior to connecting it to the rail or vice versa?

sweetbmxrider 03-18-2014 06:56 PM

The plastic clips go on the fuel rail. The line snaps over it. You guys should have asked me for help, I'm excellent at these things.

WSex 03-18-2014 07:01 PM

ditched the optimagic?

Blackbirdws6 03-18-2014 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider (Post 902019)
The plastic clips go on the fuel rail. The line snaps over it. You guys should have asked me for help, I'm excellent at these things.

Thanks for the info. Should have asked but wanted you to focus on things that help the car stop.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WSex (Post 902020)
ditched the optimagic?

Long gone although I never had an opti problem. I made the switch mainly for tuning flexibility.

Blackbirdws6 03-30-2014 04:18 PM

So this happened today. Battery was a little low on charge but within about a minute of running, the car found idle pretty well. In certain points of the video, I only gave it a slight amount of throttle (10%) which brought it up to around 2.2k. Sounds louder in the video. It may be just me but I think the engine is even smoother than before.

The brakes are bled and I just need to make a few minor adjustments to the suspension, toss the wheels on and take this thing for a ride to start breaking it in. Big thanks to all the folks who helped get the car this far. I am a real happy guy. :)


maroman88 03-30-2014 04:26 PM

that sounds amazing

sweetbmxrider 03-30-2014 04:41 PM

Glad the brakes bled and didn't leak.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.