NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds - View Single Post

Pampered-Z · 10-12-2005, 11:42 AM

I'd guess that cam is way too much for a stock bottom end or street car.

Not 100%, but I would guess P~V clearaance will be an issue above 600 lift. Â*Also, I'd like to see someone run that cam thru desktop dyno. Â*to me that seems like an odd grind. Â*My first impression is that the duration seems short for that much lift. Â*unless they were trying to keep peak power below 7,000 RPMs. Â*The stock bottom end can't handle much over 6,200. Â*

Now those heads with a different cam would certainly work great with a well built bottom end.

10-12-2005, 11:42 AM	#3
Pampered-Z Sliderule / Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Catawissa PA Posts: 2,294 iTrader: (1)	I'd guess that cam is way too much for a stock bottom end or street car. Not 100%, but I would guess P~V clearaance will be an issue above 600 lift. ÂAlso, I'd like to see someone run that cam thru desktop dyno. Âto me that seems like an odd grind. ÂMy first impression is that the duration seems short for that much lift. Âunless they were trying to keep peak power below 7,000 RPMs. ÂThe stock bottom end can't handle much over 6,200. Â Now those heads with a different cam would certainly work great with a well built bottom end. __________________ 93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada 1) Build it 2) Race it 3) Break it 4) Repeat!!!