Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2005, 10:36 PM   #1
maroman88
12 Second Club
 
maroman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oradell
Posts: 8,368
iTrader: (11)
1.6 Ratio ROLLER Rocker Arms

what are these? benifits over stock? and how hard to install?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...965136596&rd=1
__________________
86 Camaro
88 Camaro
95 Impala SS
97 Trans Am WS6
98 Blazer ZR2
00 Corvette
04 CTS-V
07 Sublime Charger Daytona
10 Tahoe SSV
12 Tahoe LT
17 Malibu LT
maroman88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2005, 12:54 PM   #2
HardcoreZ28
 
HardcoreZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 2,630
iTrader: (1)
They are designed to increase lobe lift over stock which is about 1.5 as well as be a more rigid design to reduce valvetrain flex. Also the roller tip cuts down on friction. These are a cheap brand though. IMO rockers aren't something you want to cheap out on.
__________________
--==RPM Resto & Custom==--

1989 IROC-Z Media Coverage:
Chevy High Performance - Readers Rides 4/03
GM High Tech Performance - Tech Article 3/06
Chevy Rumble - Tech & Feature Articles November 2006
Auto Restorer Magazine - Feature Article 5/11
SkinAndSteel.com
HardcoreZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2005, 01:08 PM   #3
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HardcoreZ28
They are designed to increase lobe lift over stock which is about 1.5 as well as be a more rigid design to reduce valvetrain flex. Â*Also the roller tip cuts down on friction. Â*These are a cheap brand though. Â*IMO rockers aren't something you want to cheap out on.
those look like crap.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2005, 08:35 PM   #4
maroman88
12 Second Club
 
maroman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oradell
Posts: 8,368
iTrader: (11)
well duhh there on ebay lol, how much am i looking to spend , wat about hp numbers and how to install, something i could easily do myself?

thanks for the help
__________________
86 Camaro
88 Camaro
95 Impala SS
97 Trans Am WS6
98 Blazer ZR2
00 Corvette
04 CTS-V
07 Sublime Charger Daytona
10 Tahoe SSV
12 Tahoe LT
17 Malibu LT
maroman88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2005, 09:54 PM   #5
Ian
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
iTrader: (7)
well, I think the most you could spend without going to shaft mounted rockers, x2, would be a little over 300 bucks for crane gold rockers . I've put rocker arms on a car before, never had a problem, but they weren't roller rockers so thats not much help .
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434 View Post
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2005, 06:08 AM   #6
Batman
11 Second Club
 
Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fishkill, NY
Posts: 1,278
iTrader: (1)
If you aren't building a race engine those rockers will be fine. If you are making less then 400HP and not revving up around 6000 RPM or higher you don't need fancy aluminum race rockers. When was the last time you heard of a factory motor tossing a rocker arm? In fact I had the fancy $700 rockers on the T/A and tossed them for stockers cause they worked better. The roller tip reduces friction and the 1.6 increases valve lift. You could probably see 10-15 RWH from and not break the bank. I agree they aren't "As" reliable as a $400 set of race rockers but they would be fine for a streeter that sees the track IMO. Also check to make sure even though they are a "self aligning" type they may require screw in rocker studs and guideplates.
__________________
-Nick
9/11/01- Never Forget
2002 Pontiac Trans-Am WS6 # 206
Chasing 10's
469RWH/437RWTQ
11.05 @ 123
Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2005, 07:49 AM   #7
HardcoreZ28
 
HardcoreZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 2,630
iTrader: (1)
I disagree. I had a set of those cheap shat rockers once and I had two of the roller tips break and one die because of heat buildup in it.
Don't cheap out on roller rockers.
__________________
--==RPM Resto & Custom==--

1989 IROC-Z Media Coverage:
Chevy High Performance - Readers Rides 4/03
GM High Tech Performance - Tech Article 3/06
Chevy Rumble - Tech & Feature Articles November 2006
Auto Restorer Magazine - Feature Article 5/11
SkinAndSteel.com
HardcoreZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2005, 09:34 PM   #8
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
cheapy stamped rockers with a roller tip.
they are self aligning so they will go right onto your car. no guideplates or studs needed.
the benefit of these rockers is minimal without retunign the car to take advantage of teh extra lift and duration at .050. your .0 to .0 duration will remain the same.
depending how old your heads and valve springs are will make a difference too. when you increase the ratio of the rocker arm you are putting more stress on the stud, valve stems, and the rocker itself. also the "increased" cam size that this woudl create woudl call for more revs, are your heads up to it?
i agree with paul, rockers are a bad corner to cut. if you want the benefits of a bigger cam either spend the money on a good set of rockers or do it all teh way right and stab a new cam in the thing.

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.