![]() |
j0n cut a 2.13 60'?!?!?!? no f*ckin way!!!
that's right ladies and gents...j0n finally figured out how to launch his pos...here's the timeslip:
60' - 2.136 330 - 5.859 1/8 - 8.954 MPH - 79.92 1000 - 11.589 1/4 - 13.805 MPH - 101.58 Only change from my previous best of 13.969 was a tune by fasterthanyou...this was all in 86* weather...i can't wait for a cool day and some non-stock suspension! EDIT: still stock suspension on street radials(yoko avid) with a 6-speed |
get tires and call it a day
|
Quote:
|
i had a 2.131 60' with my V6 Camaro.... :D
|
Quote:
|
wow nice...now your only 2 tenths away from a certain v6 car lol...I really need to hit the track again soon so I know where I stand against you so I know exactly how much **** I can talk.
|
Quote:
Beotch!!!! Nah, I think 2.2's? :wink: Learn to drive beotch! |
So, what was the secret launch recipe to get your 2.1??? Best I ever pulled off with my TPI/5-speed was a 2.3, and that was with a modified suspension.
|
dude i cut a 2.13 running high 14's jon...rollin on 18's lol...most of my runs are 2.15's though overall...cant wait to try the 16's...hopefully they'll be able to hook slightly better.
|
congrats j0n. throw some drag radials on it and get some suspension under it and you will be in good shape.
later tim |
Just curious Jon, but what RPM did you launch at & shift at, and did you slip the clutch or dump it?
Whenever TTP gets back to me about some work I have planned, I promise I will hit the track more often and work on my times. |
Quote:
|
Congrats! Now let's work on fixing that exhaust leak and you might find more hp. To Jon's credit, that car is heafty. A 2.1 60' with stick in a convert at that weight on streets is a good diver. I won't say excellent but if he adds drag radials and starts cutting 1.8_'s I'll move him up with Craig.
Jon, the CAGS = CARS in Tunercat so yeah, it's disabled. Go ahead and remove your "fix" and see if it's gone. |
GOOD JOB MAN!
|
sweet thanks jon...thanks for the somewhat decent replies
alex i slipped the clutch out at 3700rpm and shifted around 5600 but i let 3rd run all the way out till the end of the track...got better results that way then shifting into 4th |
Quote:
Then we can see how well 315's will blow up my clutch & rear-end :lol: |
Quote:
|
102 in 3rd is only ~5950 rpm 8)...whereas for me its 6200, so i would def. need to shift :D
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.