 |
08-07-2006, 08:29 PM
|
#1
|
|
13 Second Club / Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
|
for those of you who came to teh car show with us
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 08:39 PM
|
#2
|
|
NJFBOA Co-Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
|
wow, black paint and stripes. woopy fuggin doooo!!!
it is just a mustang, get over that over weight, slow ass turd.
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 08:42 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edison
Posts: 7,856
|
Idk Id take a mustang over a 5th gen right now because of what im hearing..
__________________
1984 Firebird
2000 Z28
2023 Tacoma
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 08:47 PM
|
#4
|
|
13 Second Club / Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
wow, black paint and stripes. woopy fuggin doooo!!!
it is just a mustang, get over that over weight, slow ass turd.
|
the mustang does indeed suck, but why isnt GM throwing a decent pony car at us? what makes you think the camaro is gonna be so much lighter? i'm just playing devils advocate here. the new camaro will have to meet stricter safety regulations and will need more creature comforts then the 4th gen to sell. my 4th gen was over 3400 for comparisons sake.
black paint and stripes seems to be the winner too since my neighbor is having a replica made for himself
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 08:50 PM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edison
Posts: 7,856
|
I have a feeling its gonna be
Dodge>all
__________________
1984 Firebird
2000 Z28
2023 Tacoma
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 08:52 PM
|
#6
|
|
13 Second Club / Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WayFast84
I have a feeling its gonna be
Dodge>all
|
negative, this is muscle car talk, not hemi powered tanks
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 09:47 PM
|
#7
|
|
Co-Founder / Site Admin
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by qwikz28
negative, this is muscle car talk, not hemi powered tanks
|
- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 12:08 AM
|
#8
|
|
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
|
even the SRT8 300C's are only running 13's. LS1 cars run faster than they do. I'll wait until they give specs on the production camaro before I make my judgements. I still hate the new mustangs though, I'd take a 99-04 over the newer ones anyday!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 12:12 AM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edison
Posts: 7,856
|
i just like how mustangs sound off a down shift.
everyday at the bus stop a social studys teacher would down shift in front of me just to taunt me..
__________________
1984 Firebird
2000 Z28
2023 Tacoma
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 12:32 AM
|
#10
|
|
2007 Member of the Year
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seabrook, TX
Posts: 14,281
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WayFast84
Idk Id take a mustang over a 5th gen right now because of what im hearing..
|
and what are you hearing.
__________________
WF=DF
Kommandant of the ACL (Anti Canadian League)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTb1ow
Junk the pos, spend the money on beer, acquire headache.
Same result cept this headache doesnt last months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 12:39 AM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edison
Posts: 7,856
|
5.3
__________________
1984 Firebird
2000 Z28
2023 Tacoma
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 08:11 AM
|
#12
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by qwikz28
negative, this is muscle car talk, not hemi powered tanks
|
f-bodies and mustangs are pony cars, not muscle cars
hemi powered tanks = muscle cars = big car with a big motor
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 08:41 AM
|
#13
|
|
Hippy Mod, Bergermeister Meisterberger, Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ewing
Posts: 6,216
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GP99GT
f-bodies and mustangs are pony cars, not muscle cars
hemi powered tanks = muscle cars = big car with a big motor
|
That's a big negative. muscle car = small/mid size car with big motor. The 64 GTO was the original muscle car. 4400 lb cars will never be muscle cars no matter what you put under the hood.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8 4 wheel disc brakes - being restored
09 Silverado Z71
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 08:42 AM
|
#14
|
|
Co-Founder / Site Admin
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GP99GT
f-bodies and mustangs are pony cars, not muscle cars
hemi powered tanks = muscle cars = big car with a big motor
|
The challenger always was a pony car, but now they have just turned it into a pig....
- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 03:14 PM
|
#15
|
|
8 Second Club
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,315
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WayFast84
everyday at the bus stop
|
for some reason that cracked me up 
Last edited by baddest434; 08-08-2006 at 03:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 03:20 PM
|
#16
|
|
I will beat you with a toaster!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,054
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy
The challenger always was a pony car, but now they have just turned it into a pig....
- Justin
|
From what I hear the new challenger is gonna be a beast weight wise. The GTO was the first true muscle car, the Chevelle didnt get as much recognition that year because the cubic inches were kept to 327 while the poncho 389 was the preffered engine. But what most dont know about is the few 64 SS Chevelles that came from the factory with a special package that involved a 370 horse Vette engine backed by a 4speed.  The numbers were extremly low, but they weighted 2900 lbs in hardtop form and 3250 in convertible form compared to the GTO's hefty 3800 lbs. Ughh to be back in the mid 60s and see this stuff unfold.
__________________
___________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 04:06 PM
|
#17
|
|
13 Second Club / Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bad64chevelle
From what I hear the new challenger is gonna be a beast weight wise. The GTO was the first true muscle car, the Chevelle didnt get as much recognition that year because the cubic inches were kept to 327 while the poncho 389 was the preffered engine. But what most dont know about is the few 64 SS Chevelles that came from the factory with a special package that involved a 370 horse Vette engine backed by a 4speed. The numbers were extremly low, but they weighted 2900 lbs in hardtop form and 3250 in convertible form compared to the GTO's hefty 3800 lbs. Ughh to be back in the mid 60s and see this stuff unfold. |
oh jon... you my friend, were born in the wrong era
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 04:18 PM
|
#18
|
|
I will beat you with a toaster!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,054
|
youre right...damnit
__________________
___________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
