Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2006, 08:47 AM   #1
NightRydaSS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 513
iTrader: (0)
BMR Torque and LCA's

I'm thinking of buying a BMR Torque arm and their LCA. My car is NOT lowered and don't plan on doing so. Is there anything i need to be warned about? Any vibration issues? I read that "Not so good vibrations" thread under mine and i dont want that issue. i'm getting the NON-Adjustable ones. so with stock ride hight and 17"-18" rims, any worries? Or is it just with lowered cars u have to worry?
NightRydaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2006, 09:43 AM   #2
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,473
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

You should be fine. Although I would recommend paying the extra for the adjustable torque arm....

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 12:41 PM   #3
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Poly ended LCA's?
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 02:03 PM   #4
Batman
11 Second Club
 
Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fishkill, NY
Posts: 1,278
iTrader: (1)
I have a non-adjustable BMR torque arm and it is nice and quiet, comes pre-set to -2 degrees also. I don't see it worth the extra cash and hassle for an adjustable if you aren't lowering your car or going for the extra .01 at the track. The way I looked at is am I willing to crawl under the car and adjust it at the track a bunch of times? The adjustability is nice but if you aren't going to use it then don't bother getting it.
__________________
-Nick
9/11/01- Never Forget
2002 Pontiac Trans-Am WS6 # 206
Chasing 10's
469RWH/437RWTQ
11.05 @ 123
Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 02:56 PM   #5
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman View Post
I have a non-adjustable BMR torque arm and it is nice and quiet, comes pre-set to -2 degrees also. I don't see it worth the extra cash and hassle for an adjustable if you aren't lowering your car or going for the extra .01 at the track. The way I looked at is am I willing to crawl under the car and adjust it at the track a bunch of times? The adjustability is nice but if you aren't going to use it then don't bother getting it.
Does the adjustable offer anything other than easy pinion angle changes?
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 03:19 PM   #6
Rich189
NJFBOA Supporting Sponsor
 
Rich189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,372
iTrader: (7)
for the lca's get rod ended from what i keep reading (im in the same boat as you except im gonna be lowered) the polys will bind up and the rod ends will make a little noise,,, imo id rather have noise then the rear binding
__________________
www.JerseyDevilDetails.com

2002 Trans am ws6.. black on black bolt ons with a JS built trans, 3200 stall,TTM's w/315's, full umi adj rear suspension, strano springs/sways, and koni 4/4's

2015 Forester XT touring... STI Sway bars

Last edited by Rich189; 11-02-2006 at 03:20 PM.
Rich189 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 03:43 PM   #7
Batman
11 Second Club
 
Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fishkill, NY
Posts: 1,278
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT View Post
Does the adjustable offer anything other than easy pinion angle changes?
Can't think of anything else it can do......I did open a beer bottle on mine once when I had the Spohn....
__________________
-Nick
9/11/01- Never Forget
2002 Pontiac Trans-Am WS6 # 206
Chasing 10's
469RWH/437RWTQ
11.05 @ 123
Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 03:45 PM   #8
Batman
11 Second Club
 
Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fishkill, NY
Posts: 1,278
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich189 View Post
for the lca's get rod ended from what i keep reading (im in the same boat as you except im gonna be lowered) the polys will bind up and the rod ends will make a little noise,,, imo id rather have noise then the rear binding
My poly's have never bound up,most of the time that is because people tighten the hell out of the bolts holding them on. I would highly recommend if you do go Poly you buy a set with Grease fittings.
__________________
-Nick
9/11/01- Never Forget
2002 Pontiac Trans-Am WS6 # 206
Chasing 10's
469RWH/437RWTQ
11.05 @ 123
Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 09:32 PM   #9
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,684
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

rod ends can be noisy if not maintained
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 09:31 AM   #10
NightRydaSS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 513
iTrader: (0)
ok, thanks guy! umm the LCA's come with built in grease fittings and what not. seriously tho, will i really notice a difference with tublar LCA's and a new TRQ arm?
NightRydaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 10:00 AM   #11
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightRydaSS View Post
ok, thanks guy! umm the LCA's come with built in grease fittings and what not. seriously tho, will i really notice a difference with tublar LCA's and a new TRQ arm?
You should. I can distort stock LCAs just by twisting them by hand.

I think the BMR LCAs come with the fittings. Buy a tube of the grease as well, you should service them at every oil change.

Last edited by WildBillyT; 11-03-2006 at 10:00 AM.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 10:22 AM   #12
NightRydaSS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 513
iTrader: (0)
sweet, thanks man
NightRydaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:32 PM   #13
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,149
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT View Post
I can distort stock LCAs just by twisting them by hand.
Is that a 4th gen thing? Do their LCAs suck a lot?
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 03:06 PM   #14
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Is that a 4th gen thing? Do their LCAs suck a lot?
Stamped steel, non boxed channel-style. I had the same ones on my GTP, they make up the shoulders on my "muffler man". They aren't the greatest because they deflect under hard cornering. Upgrading to tubular or boxed can be a pretty substantial mod. Even boxing them with a $4 piece of sheet steel can make a difference.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 04:22 PM   #15
Injuneer
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 155
iTrader: (0)
The "bind" has nothing to do with how tight the bolts are. They bind when the body starts to roll in a corner, causing the front axis (bolt) of the LCA to no longer be parallel with the rear axis (bolt). The stock rubber bushings have a hollow at the top and the bottom, to prevent that from happening.... the bushing allows the front bolt to rotate relative to the rear bolt. Solid/hard poly bushings will screw up the handling if you want the ultimate cornering capabilities. For straight-line traction, bind is not an issue.

The options for preventing the bind are spherical rod ends on both ends (noisy/harsh), poly on the body end/spherical rod end on the axle end (reduces noise, keeps it away from the body), or rubber body end/poly axle end (no noise/not harsh).
__________________
Fred


1994 Formula - 381ci / 300-shot N2O / TH400 / Gear Vendor OD / Strange 12-bolt 4.11 - 11.5@117 on straight motor

Last edited by Injuneer; 11-03-2006 at 04:23 PM.
Injuneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 05:08 PM   #16
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
when i had all rod ends in my 91 RS it wasn't bad to ride around in at all. the travel is so much smoother than with bushings that the car actually rode better that it did with the eibach+bilstein combo than it did on the stock rubber stuff.
there is some noise, but it isn't anything that drowns out the radio or exhaust, so it wasn't ever a distraction to me.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.