 |
|
06-20-2008, 10:48 AM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Piscataway, N.J.
Posts: 1,729
|
Great Gas Mileage Tips that WORK!
Just got back from a 200 mile trip into Pennsiltucky on the N.J. Turnpike and the Pennsie Turnpike. Kept the cruise on @ 64 mph and had almost NO traffic. Have 5W30 Mobil 1 in my 1995 Grand Am with the 3.1 V/6 that was rated at 29 mpg highway. Using VERY gentle pressure on the gas pedal, coasting up to lights and no air on, it got 33.7 mpg. I did hit 32 mpg on my runs to Toms River(again on the G.S. Parkway)and using the cruise @ 64 mph, does the trick. I KNOW THAT EVERYBODY AND HIS MOTHER WAS PASSING ME, but if thats what it takes, then so be it. I just read that for every minute you idle at a light, you could have driven a 1/2 mile. So small things like shutting off you engine if stuck in traffic or at a long light add up. It may be EXTREME, but if you can afford to pay $4.00 PLUS for a gallon of gas, God Bless You!
__________________
1991 FORMULA 350-GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
1 of 1,197 with L98 Option/13.79@100 mph
1994 25th ANNIVERSARY TRANS AM GT -1 of ONLY 2,000 made/ Only 128 made with a HURST 6-Speed Manual and 91 with T-Tops and Compact Disc/ K & N Filtercharger/Magnaflow Performance Muffler/Air Foil- ORIGINAL MINT Arctic White Ultra Rare SURVIVOR. DAYTONA 500 PACE CAR Decal Kit!
SOLD: 1989 Turbo T/A in 1991 it ran 12:18@115 mph
Last edited by edpontiac91; 06-20-2008 at 12:07 PM.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 10:55 AM
|
#2
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Browns Mills NJ/ Rotondo West FL
Posts: 3,054
|
I thought shutting off your car and starting it up again uses more gas then being at idle. Yea I usually drive like that but luckily I only live 10 minutes from work and have an occasional 45 minute ride every few weeks. These gas prices are certainly keeping me away from getting another v8. I wonder how much its going to hurt the 5th gen maros. Still wanting something american and performance wise I think a srt4 is in my near future.
__________________
AI HCR 241's , Lunati 223/236 .615/.626 114+2 , Full Exhaust , Ported Fast 92 , Ported LS2 TB , Veraram , 85mm MAF , Circle D 4000 , 3.42's , GTP 36# , CSP Dyno tune. More on the way
420 HP/367 TQ on a Unlocked Converter & still climbing.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 11:00 AM
|
#3
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonmouthCtyAntz
I thought shutting off your car and starting it up again uses more gas then being at idle.
|
I think that's true, but he said "in traffic". If you aren't moving at all, go ahead and shut it down.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 11:06 AM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 929
|
yeah i have a 94 grand am with that motor, great car. i was averaging 27mpg commuting to school with it, doing about 80ish on rt. occasional air and traffic as well.
__________________
1986 IROC-Z - 305- .030 over, Voodoo cam, 113 vette heads, tpi, hedman torque steps, GMMG 3in catback, custom chip, t56, 3.27s 9 bolt, rest of the car is stock.
2011 Camaro - 2lt/rs red jewel tincoat, m6 - SOLD
2014 Camaro SS - bolt ons
1998 Jimmy - the beater
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 11:10 AM
|
#5
|
MIR
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT
I think that's true, but he said "in traffic". If you aren't moving at all, go ahead and shut it down.
|
He also said a long light. I think hell freeze over before I shut off my car at the light so I can save .01 gallon of gas.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 11:14 AM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
|
Rule of thumb is 90 sec of idle is worth shutting down and restarting.
(btw don't you mean mpg not mph?)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
dumbass.
|
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 11:21 AM
|
#7
|
MIR
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knipps
Rule of thumb is 90 sec of idle is worth shutting down and restarting.
(btw don't you mean mpg not mph?)
|
Unless you are on 80 during rush hour and there has been an accident I do not see traffic standing still for that long, usually it moves but at 5mph pace. Although I did get caught there once, and I actually did shut down the car but we stood for over an hour in one place
I guess i just don't see traffic standing still for that long, and constant restarting of the car would get really annoying really fast.
Last edited by Tsar; 06-20-2008 at 11:22 AM.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 11:48 AM
|
#8
|
13 Second Club / Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsar
Unless you are on 80 during rush hour and there has been an accident I do not see traffic standing still for that long, usually it moves but at 5mph pace. Although I did get caught there once, and I actually did shut down the car but we stood for over an hour in one place
I guess i just don't see traffic standing still for that long, and constant restarting of the car would get really annoying really fast. 
|
constant restarting puts a huge strain on your car. not worth it IMO. save a dollar now or risk a potentially more expensive repair. pick your poison
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
|
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#9
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsar
He also said a long light. I think hell freeze over before I shut off my car at the light so I can save .01 gallon of gas.
|
Wasn't paying attention. Yeah, that's not right at all.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#10
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Piscataway, N.J.
Posts: 1,729
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT
I think that's true, but he said "in traffic". If you aren't moving at all, go ahead and shut it down.
|
With todays Fuel Injection motors, you will use NO more gas when starting it back up when it is shut down. I'am not saying that you stop and start it every few minutes, but if you know you have up to a long light, shut it down. Even going down a long hill or seeing a traffic light in the distance, it pays to put it into Neutral and coast to the stopped traffic. Also try not to hot foot it from a stop. Gas it slowly and let up on the pedal to allow it to shift up into the next gear and then give it more gas. Getting into the highest gear possible quickly will also help quite a bit!
__________________
1991 FORMULA 350-GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
1 of 1,197 with L98 Option/13.79@100 mph
1994 25th ANNIVERSARY TRANS AM GT -1 of ONLY 2,000 made/ Only 128 made with a HURST 6-Speed Manual and 91 with T-Tops and Compact Disc/ K & N Filtercharger/Magnaflow Performance Muffler/Air Foil- ORIGINAL MINT Arctic White Ultra Rare SURVIVOR. DAYTONA 500 PACE CAR Decal Kit!
SOLD: 1989 Turbo T/A in 1991 it ran 12:18@115 mph
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 12:06 PM
|
#11
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edpontiac91
With todays Fuel Injection motors, you will use NO more gas when starting it back up when it is shut down. I'am not saying that you stop and start it every few minutes, but if you know you have up to a long light, shut it down. Even going down a long hill or seeing a traffic light in the distance, it pays to put it into Neutral and coast to the stopped traffic. Also try not to hot foot it from a stop. Gas it slowly and let up on the pedal to allow it to shift up into the next gear and then give it more gas. Getting into the highest gear possible quickly will also help quite a bit!
|
Neutral to coast, OK. But shutting it down and starting it up at lights can't be that great for the motor.
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 07:55 PM
|
#12
|
12 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vineland
Posts: 928
|
I find, considering i drive 94 miles daily, that gas mileage "tips" are totally dependant on the vehicle.
Shutting off the car at a light I think is silly, the car still has to be in open loop for x amount of time, and open loop = more fuel than when in closed loop like you just were at idle at the light.
Second, I think being "gentle" from a light can be a waste dependant on the car again. If you were to graph it, by being at very light throttle, the engine is under a given load for a longer period of time, instead of just climbing through to get to its high gear. That relates to using more fuel while attempting to get up to speed. This is why, a car with a 3.73 gear will get better city mileage than a car with a 2.73 gear, under the same conditions of course.
Speed on the highway is totally dependant on where the engine is most effecient. Most small engine cars tend to be most efficient around 55 mph. A bigger engine that likes to breathe will be more efficient at speeds above that. My camaro (87) for example, will get 17 mpg at 55-60, 19 at 65-70, and about 22 mpg at 75-80 mph. My hyundai will get 35 mpg at 55-58 mph, but 32 at 65-70. A customer at work was talking about mpg in his E63. City driving the car will get 12-14 mpg, however if he cruises at 85 it will get 25 mpg, lower than that and he gets only about 17-19, which is where they are rated at.
A/C will deplete gas mileage in city/traffic driving. However at highway speeds the load is much less on the engine so mpg doesnt suffer nearly as bad. 1 mpg or less on the highway loss to me is worth it if im comfortable.
I find one of the universal tricks to geting decent mpg is not to necessarily use a light foot, but more so a steady one. Cruise control is your friend. Some cars even have it setup so that when cruise is engaged fuel trims are leaned out substantially.
__________________
87 iroc with the usual go fast stuff
heavier than your half ton.
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 08:21 PM
|
#13
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Yep goin slow is key. In my truck with no over drive and the big old 36in tires I turn like 2800 rpm's keeping up with traffic doing 70/75. Yesterday I went from Point Pleasant to Highland Park which is basically a 50min drive on the GSP. Instead of slamming there I took my time and did 55-65, light throttle, right lane all the way. It only took me a 1/3rd tank of gas there and back vs more than a 1/3rd taking a 20min drive doing 75/80 in that truck.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 08:21 PM
|
#14
|
Co-Founder / Site Admin
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCdan330
I find, considering i drive 94 miles daily, that gas mileage "tips" are totally dependant on the vehicle.
Shutting off the car at a light I think is silly, the car still has to be in open loop for x amount of time, and open loop = more fuel than when in closed loop like you just were at idle at the light.
Second, I think being "gentle" from a light can be a waste dependant on the car again. If you were to graph it, by being at very light throttle, the engine is under a given load for a longer period of time, instead of just climbing through to get to its high gear. That relates to using more fuel while attempting to get up to speed. This is why, a car with a 3.73 gear will get better city mileage than a car with a 2.73 gear, under the same conditions of course.
Speed on the highway is totally dependant on where the engine is most effecient. Most small engine cars tend to be most efficient around 55 mph. A bigger engine that likes to breathe will be more efficient at speeds above that. My camaro (87) for example, will get 17 mpg at 55-60, 19 at 65-70, and about 22 mpg at 75-80 mph. My hyundai will get 35 mpg at 55-58 mph, but 32 at 65-70. A customer at work was talking about mpg in his E63. City driving the car will get 12-14 mpg, however if he cruises at 85 it will get 25 mpg, lower than that and he gets only about 17-19, which is where they are rated at.
A/C will deplete gas mileage in city/traffic driving. However at highway speeds the load is much less on the engine so mpg doesnt suffer nearly as bad. 1 mpg or less on the highway loss to me is worth it if im comfortable.
I find one of the universal tricks to geting decent mpg is not to necessarily use a light foot, but more so a steady one. Cruise control is your friend. Some cars even have it setup so that when cruise is engaged fuel trims are leaned out substantially.
|
All very good points, especially the last one.
Other good things to do are to pay attention to what's going on down the road from you, so you can adjust accordingly. Also pay attention to the cycle of traffic lights on your commute. There is a set of lights on my way home from work where if you at the first one when it is red, there is no way to come remotely close to making it through the next light before it turns red. Every night I see the same cars tear away from the first light like crazy, only to slam on their brakes when they get to the next light. I don't bother going over 40 (55 zone), and I arrive at the light just after it goes back to green and roll past every sitting, smiling to myself about all the idiots I'm rolling past.
- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 08:28 PM
|
#15
|
Meet Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,368
|
i shut mine off if im stuck at a bridge. look at how the hybrids work though, shutting the engine off and restarting. every car is different and they are designed for this purpose, but in the right application it works.
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 08:37 PM
|
#16
|
Keyboard Tough Guy
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
|
I've been able to get over 40mpg doing 50-55mph with the cruise on in my GTP, just staying out of it is the best way to get good mileage. As for the shutting off the engine thing I have done it at lights where I know I'll be waiting a good 3-5 minutes or at DMV, other than that I'll let it idle...there are open loop tables in the pcm that will automatically richen the mixture upon startup for a set amount of time even if the engine is warm so depending on that mixture & how long its set to stay rich its usually not worth it for any short amount of time although I wouldn't be worried about starting your vehicle. If thats your main concern maybe you should ride a bike instead as they have no 'startup' issues...I dunno about you guys but I've started my gtp up probably 10-20 thousand times over the last 4 years I've owned it so starting it isn't much of an issue
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 09:38 PM
|
#17
|
King of Free
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,750
|
with today's injection anything over 10 seconds of idling it's more efficient to kill the car. That is of course not counting wear and tear of engine / starter etc.
__________________
2001 Trans Am M6 WS6 Black on Black...on Black
PaceSetter LT's, TSP catted Y,Borla catback, SLP lid
!CAGS, Eibach pro-kit, Bilstein shocks, 5% tint all around
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 10:01 PM
|
#18
|
Hippy Mod, Bergermeister Meisterberger, Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ewing
Posts: 6,216
|
What I don't understand is why today's cars don't get much better gas mileage. My old 89 Cavalier Z24 with the 2.8 and 5 speed would get 33 mpg on the highway easily. There aren't a whole lot of V6 cars today that truly get 33 mpg on the highway and they all should. Cars got bigger and people got power hungry. And they are all pedal to the metal and slam on the brakes when they get to a light. As for shutting a car off at a light, no way I would do that. Starting a car is the worst thing you can do so why do it more than you need to.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8 4 wheel disc brakes - being restored
09 Silverado Z71
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 10:14 PM
|
#19
|
Admin.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JL8Jeff
What I don't understand is why today's cars don't get much better gas mileage. My old 89 Cavalier Z24 with the 2.8 and 5 speed would get 33 mpg on the highway easily. There aren't a whole lot of V6 cars today that truly get 33 mpg on the highway and they all should. Cars got bigger and people got power hungry. And they are all pedal to the metal and slam on the brakes when they get to a light. As for shutting a car off at a light, no way I would do that. Starting a car is the worst thing you can do so why do it more than you need to.
|
Don't forget all the wt from soudn deadener & miles of wires & needless electronics. Does the average joe need 10 speakers & nav? Then there are 48 airbags, etc, etc,etc.
This weekend I learned 6 speeds are better then 4. I got 20.5 mpg in the Z going out to Carlisle with a very poorly tuned carb. Up from ~13 mpg.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!
The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.
Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.
Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 06:43 PM
|
#20
|
Co-Founder / Site Admin
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanfx
with today's injection anything over 10 seconds of idling it's more efficient to kill the car. That is of course not counting wear and tear of engine / starter etc.
|
Not true in most cases....read the post above yours. He works for HP Tuners and I'm betting that he knows the computer in your car better than you.....no offense.
- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 09:47 PM
|
#21
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 65
|
theres somethings i dont get, my brothers truck, 2000 Ford Explorer w/ a V6, gets about 13ish mpg, but had he gotten the v8 Explorer he would supposedly get better than the v6.
Someone wanna explain this to me?
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 09:51 PM
|
#22
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: south jersey
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by firebirdat
theres somethings i dont get, my brothers truck, 2000 Ford Explorer w/ a V6, gets about 13ish mpg, but had he gotten the v8 Explorer he would supposedly get better than the v6.
Someone wanna explain this to me?
|
Fords are F**King Over Rated Disasters....if this doesn't help, please refer to the fact that they are F**Ked Over Rebuilt Dodges
Last edited by badzracing; 06-24-2008 at 09:51 PM.
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 10:16 PM
|
#23
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Jackson, NJ
Posts: 1,749
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by firebirdat
theres somethings i dont get, my brothers truck, 2000 Ford Explorer w/ a V6, gets about 13ish mpg, but had he gotten the v8 Explorer he would supposedly get better than the v6.
Someone wanna explain this to me?
|
the v6 has to work a lot harder than the v8 to get it up and moving, i dont know how much this applies to an explorer but, yea you get my point
__________________
1983 camaro- Scrap
1988 camaro- Also scrap
'05 Silverado- You guessed it, scrap
1988 TRX 250R- Ported w/ high compression on 110 octane- Out 60' your LT1
Jersey Shore Street Car Takeover (JSSCT) Founder
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
and once i get PHB, what do i ajust it too?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jersey Mike
Seven.
|
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 10:36 PM
|
#24
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by firebirdat
theres somethings i dont get, my brothers truck, 2000 Ford Explorer w/ a V6, gets about 13ish mpg, but had he gotten the v8 Explorer he would supposedly get better than the v6.
Someone wanna explain this to me?
|
That thing needs a tune up or he needs to quit flooring it.
My mom has a '99 5.0 AWD Explorer and that gets better than 13, with a bigger engine, probably the same gearing (3.73) and an assload of parasitic loss with full time AWD.
|
|
|
06-25-2008, 05:43 AM
|
#25
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
|
I gotta agree with WildBilly. something's up, i've driven a 94 explorer with a dog of a V8 and gotten better than 13 mpg
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
dumbass.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|