 |
12-09-2008, 09:06 PM
|
#1
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
I or H
Which do you guys prefer? This would be for a 355 build. Maybe see some juice but nothing serious.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
12-09-2008, 09:16 PM
|
#2
|
Co-Founder / Site Admin
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
|
As in I or H beam rods?
- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?
|
|
|
12-09-2008, 09:38 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orange County NY
Posts: 579
|
i whould go with a set og Eagle H beams
__________________
2000 Camaro 25.5 Turbo car  X275
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 07:02 AM
|
#4
|
NJFBOA Supporting Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: HULMEVILLE, PA
Posts: 2,023
|
It really depends on how much power you plan on making and how fast you are going to spin it.
__________________
JSSPEEDANDCUSTOM.COM
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 10:33 AM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hamilton nj
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSPERFORMANCE
It really depends on how much power you plan on making and how fast you are going to spin it.
|
i agree because H beam rods will cost u more at the machine shop clearancing for them. and a set of forged I beam rods r strong unless ur plannin on sprayin lik 200+ or very often
__________________
95 camaro z28 six speed 13.1 @ 106mph N/A
slp mid tubes, hooker 3" cat back with cut out, moroso cai, holly 58mm tb, eibach drag launch springs, kyb agx shocks, lakewood lca's, brand x 100 shot
stroker build this winter
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 10:48 AM
|
#6
|
Sliderule / Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
|
There always been what seems like allot of debating over which is better and why? I think the majority of people run H beams as there is less clearance issues and cost.
My engine was built to support 750+ HP at 7,000+ RPMs, it has Manely I beam rods in it. ( they were not cheap! )
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada
1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 11:43 AM
|
#7
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
Well its gonna be 355 build with stock crank, and new rods/pistons. I wanna feel safe spinning it past 6200 but prob not much higher. Perhaps some juice later on, which is why I want to go with forged stuff. So its a little past a budget build but not an all out build.
I was thinking Scat H rods.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 11:47 AM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hamilton nj
Posts: 266
|
if i were you id go I beam save yourself about $200 and they're still very strong and i think the crank would go b4 them. and 6200 isnt high at all.
__________________
95 camaro z28 six speed 13.1 @ 106mph N/A
slp mid tubes, hooker 3" cat back with cut out, moroso cai, holly 58mm tb, eibach drag launch springs, kyb agx shocks, lakewood lca's, brand x 100 shot
stroker build this winter
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 11:50 AM
|
#9
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pampered-Z
There always been what seems like allot of debating over which is better and why? I think the majority of people run H beams as there is less clearance issues and cost.
My engine was built to support 750+ HP at 7,000+ RPMs, it has Manely I beam rods in it. ( they were not cheap! )
|
This was my understanding as well.
Last edited by WildBillyT; 12-10-2008 at 11:51 AM.
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 11:50 AM
|
#10
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
Stock crank is seasoned, people have pushed it pretty far. And I wanna try to go overkill so I decide to upgrade later, I can use the same parts. And I know, 6200 isn't that much for a drag car, but where would you spin it that high on the road? And my cam peaks out around 6200-6300.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 12:21 PM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hamilton nj
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shownomercy
Stock crank is seasoned, people have pushed it pretty far. And I wanna try to go overkill so I decide to upgrade later, I can use the same parts. And I know, 6200 isn't that much for a drag car, but where would you spin it that high on the road? And my cam peaks out around 6200-6300.
|
i think u answered ur ? in this post you wanna go overkill so u can upgrade later then H beam is the way to go.
__________________
95 camaro z28 six speed 13.1 @ 106mph N/A
slp mid tubes, hooker 3" cat back with cut out, moroso cai, holly 58mm tb, eibach drag launch springs, kyb agx shocks, lakewood lca's, brand x 100 shot
stroker build this winter
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 12:23 PM
|
#12
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
Thats what I was curious about, H is considered the stronger of the two right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 12:31 PM
|
#13
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hamilton nj
Posts: 266
|
yea definatly more beefy they're considered the stronger
__________________
95 camaro z28 six speed 13.1 @ 106mph N/A
slp mid tubes, hooker 3" cat back with cut out, moroso cai, holly 58mm tb, eibach drag launch springs, kyb agx shocks, lakewood lca's, brand x 100 shot
stroker build this winter
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 12:32 PM
|
#14
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
Ok cool cool.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
12-11-2008, 04:03 PM
|
#15
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
So I was doing some window shopping, and Scat forged rods, both I and H are rated to 750 hp, whats the deal with that?
Also, can anyone explain bushed vs. pinned?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
Last edited by LTb1ow; 12-11-2008 at 04:22 PM.
|
|
|
12-12-2008, 09:03 AM
|
#16
|
Sliderule / Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
|
H <> I Look at the weight and material used as the main reasons for their HP ratings. The design H or I has less to do with what HP they will support compared to what they are made of. I 'think" some manufactures perfer H or I as well. With mine the I's were listed as stronger then H.
Think they are referring to Pinned/brushed relates to the rod pin that holds the piston to the rod.
Pinned = Rod pins are pressed in. ( most common )
Brushed = Rod is free floating and held in with retaining clips. (Mostly for all out race egines that are trying to squeeze that last 1 HP out).
** I have no idea why it would make more HP? Maybe with it free floating there is less drag as the piston moves/changes angles???
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada
1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!
|
|
|
12-12-2008, 03:49 PM
|
#17
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
So bushed would be the better bet for longevity?
And now onto the next question, rod length, I have heard a lot of different opinions.
I was even told to go 5.85... any logic?
What do you think of the 5.7 rod allowing for more heat or something?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|