Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Notices


View Poll Results: What motor would be best?
350/355 TPI with all upgrades 3 11.11%
383 TPI with all upgrades 5 18.52%
96 LT1 with h/c package 4 14.81%
LS1 w/241 heads, cam, LTs 15 55.56%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2009, 04:23 AM   #1
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
iTrader: (12)
more power out of 87 350TPI?

Motor is a rebuilt 1987 350 TPI, not bored out or anything. Runs great but lacking in the power department. Has the stock 87 roller cam and heads. Only mods are SD tune, shorty edelbrock headers, and aftermarket cat-back. Still has 3" cat converter. A T5 manual transmission is behind it.

I think the motor was rated for 225hp in 1987, and as is now, it dynoed 201hp. So thats about right i figure for a stock setup.

But now we are looking to egt more power out of it. Where should i begin?

The trans is being switch to a LT1 T56 that we already have.

The owner is thinking cam, internals, possibly a stroker kit, upgraded tpi parts, etc... but i dont think the power increase and work involved is worth it when there are other engine options. ie LT1 or LS1. I have a 7k orig mile 96 LT1 from an Impala SS, and i think with a head swap and cam, thatd give us a good power increase right off the bat.(its already set up with a stand alone wiring harness). OR id really like to go LS1 with the parts i have laying around my garage. With just a cam, LT headers, and tuning, thatd be much nicer i think. Only issue there is we'd have to swap the T56 for an LS1 T56 version, which is still feasible though.

whats you opinions?
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 07:01 AM   #2
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
my LT1 with heads/cam goes 11.53 @ 120 mph/ stock bottom end. if you need an LS1 i still have mine
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 08:24 AM   #3
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
iTrader: (12)
Personally I'm leaning towards an LS1 setup. I have basically a complete motor once i pick up the block im buying, id just need to put it together.
I have my stock '01 crankshaft, '01 241 heads, an '00 ls1 manifold, extra water pumps, etc etc. A few gaskets and some ARP bolts and i'm set.

Plus, ive been thinking about then doing forged rods and lower compression pistons, a few other upgrades, then 6.0L truck manifolds, a basic single front mount Turbo(~4-5 psi), custom intercooler install and an SD tune.... should be enough power then. If i'm not doing forced induction in my SS i figure i need to do it on something. A turbo LS1 six-speed Monte SS would def be badass.... hmmm. now just to convince the owner....
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 09:22 AM   #4
Pampered-Z
Sliderule / Moderator
 
Pampered-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
iTrader: (1)
The TPI is what kills the engine from making big HP, those long runners and small plenum are great for low end torque but can't make HP.

How far do you want to push the HP? Just dropping in the stock LT1 will gain you 50HP, mild cam like a 305 would put you near 300-310 hp. If you are looking for 375-400 HP then I would go LS1 with a nice cam and heads.

Whatever parts you buy to build the TPI 383 would be the same parts you'd use in the LT1 block. So if you want a 383 build the LT1 383. Your have better heads to start with and an intake that can support the air flow.

Remember to keep some budget for a good set of weld in subframe connects, 3rd gens bodies flex! It it's a T-top car you might want to think cage or some other supports as well.
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada

1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!

Last edited by Pampered-Z; 12-04-2009 at 09:25 AM.
Pampered-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 10:30 AM   #5
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
iTrader: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pampered-Z View Post
Remember to keep some budget for a good set of weld in subframe connects, 3rd gens bodies flex! It it's a T-top car you might want to think cage or some other supports as well.
The only reason its TPI is because thats what i had laying around in 2004 when i started building it. And as you can see, its not a 3rd gen or an fbody even. lol. In the spring, I will have the chance to go through the car again completely to clean up stuff i was never satisfied with in the original build(paint & body, gauges etc).

If i use the LT1, id need good heads since the stockers are the iron ones.
All options would cost about the same due to the number of parts i have. I honestly think an LS1 swap would be the cheapest since i have so much left laying around from my car.

The car is female owned and driven so 400+ hp is not needed, lol. But 350hp is about the lowest i want it to have.


V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 11:40 AM   #6
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
I'll take that LT1 T56 off your hands if you decide to go LS1
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 12:23 PM   #7
Pampered-Z
Sliderule / Moderator
 
Pampered-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS View Post
The car is female owned and driven so 400+ hp is not needed, lol. But 350hp is about the lowest i want it to have.

LOL! I just ASSumed it was an F-body!


For your LT1, You can get just as much HP out of those heads as the Alum versions, just have added weight. A set of stage II heads ( good porting, larger valves ) and a 305 cam should put you in the 350HP range, moving up to a 306 or GM847 cam would put you in the 370-380HP range but at that point you are going to loose some drivablity in the low RMP range, not going to be very smooth driving in traffic, will need to deal with some cam surge. So at the 375 HP range a LS1 with a hotstick and heads would make the same power but be a bit easier to drive on the street.

I'd go LS1, probably a bit easier of a swap as well,
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada

1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!
Pampered-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 12:44 PM   #8
LTb1ow
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
 
LTb1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pampered-Z View Post
LOL! I just ASSumed it was an F-body!


For your LT1, You can get just as much HP out of those heads as the Alum versions, just have added weight. A set of stage II heads ( good porting, larger valves ) and a 305 cam should put you in the 350HP range, moving up to a 306 or GM847 cam would put you in the 370-380HP range but at that point you are going to loose some drivablity in the low RMP range, not going to be very smooth driving in traffic, will need to deal with some cam surge. So at the 375 HP range a LS1 with a hotstick and heads would make the same power but be a bit easier to drive on the street.

I'd go LS1, probably a bit easier of a swap as well,
Granted the LS1 may be a tad easier to make power, but for the cam that is in my car, its def drives better than you would think. A good tune does wonders to having a larger cam.

Also, wouldn't an LS1 require new K member etc and custom headers or stock ones and custom Y pipe?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil View Post
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
LTb1ow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 01:10 PM   #9
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTs1ow View Post
Granted the LS1 may be a tad easier to make power, but for the cam that is in my car, its def drives better than you would think. A good tune does wonders to having a larger cam.

Also, wouldn't an LS1 require new K member etc and custom headers or stock ones and custom Y pipe?
he said easier...not cheaper
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 03:39 PM   #10
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
i wouldnt think that the monte would use a kmember matt....iirc those montes should use standard pedastal style mounts like for the third gen...if thats the case then the swap becomes easier....not to mention that tons of people have gotten all types of trans' to sit behind the the ls1.




i vote for ls1
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 03:51 PM   #11
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
G-body does not have a K member like an F-body does. the engine cradle is welded to the frame. however, it does have multiple bolt holes that allowed the same chassis to carry every engine from BBC, BBO, BB Buick, SBC, SBO, chevy 4.3, buick 3.8. I'd imagine the position for SBC would work with LS1
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 04:23 PM   #12
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubba428 View Post
G-body does not have a K member like an F-body does. the engine cradle is welded to the frame. however, it does have multiple bolt holes that allowed the same chassis to carry every engine from BBC, BBO, BB Buick, SBC, SBO, chevy 4.3, buick 3.8. I'd imagine the position for SBC would work with LS1
Not sure it would- but conversion gen I to LS1 motor mounts would be cheap and easy.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 04:25 PM   #13
LTb1ow
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
 
LTb1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT View Post
Not sure it would- but conversion gen I to LS1 motor mounts would be cheap and easy.
BUT isn't an LT1 SBC mounts?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil View Post
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
LTb1ow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 04:41 PM   #14
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
yes...but why would you do a motor swap and NOT change the mounts??? I mean, it just kinda makes sense to me
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 04:44 PM   #15
LTb1ow
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
 
LTb1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubba428 View Post
yes...but why would you do a motor swap and NOT change the mounts??? I mean, it just kinda makes sense to me
No I mean, an LS1 mount is a completely different style than an LT1/SBC mount.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil View Post
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
LTb1ow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 04:45 PM   #16
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
I know....what i'm saying is, your doing the work anyway... so F it, just go with the motor you choose
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 04:50 PM   #17
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3C0-...eature=related

obviously its possible, and not terribly hard
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 06:53 PM   #18
GP99GT
Mr Fantastic
 
GP99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
iTrader: (2)
blower
__________________
Matt

B18B1 FTW
GP99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 11:20 PM   #19
LTb1ow
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
 
LTb1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
iTrader: (8)
You could get all sorts of crazy hybrid... LT1 intake converted to work on the TPI... a LS1 running it... 8 coils versus dizzy... and then, lots of nitrous.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil View Post
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
LTb1ow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 01:11 AM   #20
S.J.SLEEPER
 
S.J.SLEEPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: barnegat nj
Posts: 1,340
iTrader: (10)
damn.... seems like everyones ls1 nuthuggin for once....
yes mr. ls1nuthugger says go ls1.
I have tons of stock ls1 parts pans,mounts,blocks, and alot of stuff would be more than glad to just give you to help you out. and get more room in my shop.

you can bolt a t400/700r4 behind the ls1 with now problem at all.
as for t56 I am sure there is something you can do with that too..
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRGN View Post
I never pulled into the staging beams at the track and saw a dyno in the other lane.
South Jersey Racecraft
S.J.SLEEPER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 04:57 PM   #21
Teds89IROC
 
Teds89IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haledon, NJ
Posts: 5,162
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP99GT View Post
blower
This
__________________
1989 IROC-Z 355 LT1 T56 Swapped
2016 Chevy Colorado LT 3.6 v6
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L RIP 12/29/2016
1998 Honda CBR 600F3
2003 Yamaha FX140
Teds89IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 08:16 PM   #22
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

I vote 350 TPI - she doesn't need anything nuts, and this setup will provide plenty of low end grunt that a nice street car needs. Toss a little boost in the mix and you negate the downsides of the TPI intake, it flows great when it's pressurized!

LSx motors are great, but everyone and their mother wants to swap 'em these days. Going against the grain is more your style Paul

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 02:33 AM   #23
bubba428
 
bubba428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
iTrader: (0)
sooooo you selling that T-56...........
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
bubba428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 07:17 AM   #24
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
iTrader: (12)
hmmm a forced induction 350TPI... thats a possiblility...

in that case we'd keep the lt1 T56...

so now a blower or turbo...hmmmm
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 10:22 PM   #25
JerzLT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
turbos are a bitch to tune
  Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.