 |
|
01-29-2010, 02:48 PM
|
#51
|
Meet Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,368
|
looks like a 240sx
|
|
|
01-29-2010, 05:22 PM
|
#52
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arm pit of the world... NJ
Posts: 2,677
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon
mustang had a more usable rear backseat than the fbodies did too. thats appealing to a lot of people
|
As opposed to the front backseat?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrel
but that got negated because the 93 m6 cars had 3:23's instead of 3:42s
|
They also had 2.73.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT
A 2.97 and 3.23 has a better launch ratio than a 2.66 and a 3.42. Doesn't help past first gear though. Point taken.
|
93 m6 also came with 3.36 first gear too.
__________________
John
|
|
|
01-29-2010, 05:51 PM
|
#53
|
12 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford
Posts: 8,373
|
thanks for posting those commercial's of the black TA... now i reallllly dont wanna sell mine!
__________________
88 Camaro
95 Impala SS
97 Trans Am WS6
98 Blazer ZR2
00 Corvette
04 CTS-V
04 Grand Cherokee
06 GMC Sierra
07 Sublime Charger Daytona
12 Tahoe LT
17 Malibu LT
|
|
|
01-29-2010, 06:28 PM
|
#54
|
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS
i cant find a lotus model that matches it either though, may be a one off "kit" car for the commercial...

|
Rear end looks like a 928 Porsche (Maybe, one of those Porsche's)
|
|
|
01-29-2010, 07:26 PM
|
#55
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrel
my neighbor had one that did just that... and with just an intake/exhaust he ran consistent 13.6's
|
Well my old roomate had a 93 T/A with 57,000 miles on it back in 2004 that ran a 14.2@99mph with a 1.9 60' that was bone stock.. That was a good 60' for stock 16 inch wheels and street tires and with some DR's he would have ran a 13 second pass but that would not have been all stock! All I was saying is I have never seen a bone stock, Non Ram air,auto LT1 run a 13 second pass at the track.
I am not dogging the LT1 at all. I own one and love it just as much as my LS1. Hell I went 13.14@110 in my 02 WS6 with a 2.3 60'!! Thats a crappy pass. If I had a 60' of a 1.9 then I would have run a mid 12. I will be the 1st to say it that I suck at the track!! I cut less then a 2.0 1 time in my life and I broke a rear end doing it. I cut a 1.7 in my V6 on DR's that would have been a low 12 High 11 if it didnt break and everything else went right!!
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
Last edited by Slow-V6; 01-29-2010 at 07:29 PM.
|
|
|
01-30-2010, 09:02 AM
|
#56
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
|
You're missing the point where his car was also 11 years old at that point
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
dumbass.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2010, 04:25 PM
|
#57
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knipps
You're missing the point where his car was also 11 years old at that point
|
No *****! How can you have a brand new 1993 T/A?
All I said was I have never seen a Bone stock, Non Ram Air or SS , Auto, LT1 powered F-body run 13's stock!!
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
|
|
|
01-30-2010, 04:31 PM
|
#58
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing/Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,904
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow-V6
No *****! How can you have a brand new 1993 T/A?
All I said was I have never seen a Bone stock, Non Ram Air or SS , Auto, LT1 powered F-body run 13's stock!!
|
www.speeddensity.org, tons of auto 93's went/go 13's bone stock
__________________
EB
99 Riviera, Bone stock, 14.34 @ 96 "Walking 5.0's in luxury" RIP
95 Cherokee, Bone stock 16.2 @ 83 "Treeing your 3rd gen and beating it to the line despite trapping less....and looking better"
93 TA, Bone stock, 13.8 @ 100 "Beating ****** drivers in ****** LS1's"
https://www.facebook.com/groups/285090241699967/
R.I.P. Tia
|
|
|
01-30-2010, 04:39 PM
|
#59
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrel
|
Um if you are talking about the cars on the timeslip pages that say NA that doesnt mean they are bone stock! And in the racing forum alot of those 13 second cars say Calculated 1/4 mile times because they only ran a 1/8 mile. they dont even list there mods or if they are stock!!
Like I said for the past 10,000 times I Personally have never seen a bone stock Auto LT1 F-body run a 13 at the track!!
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
Last edited by Slow-V6; 01-30-2010 at 04:41 PM.
|
|
|
01-31-2010, 12:35 AM
|
#60
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing/Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,904
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow-V6
Um if you are talking about the cars on the timeslip pages that say NA that doesnt mean they are bone stock! And in the racing forum alot of those 13 second cars say Calculated 1/4 mile times because they only ran a 1/8 mile. they dont even list there mods or if they are stock!!
Like I said for the past 10,000 times I Personally have never seen a bone stock Auto LT1 F-body run a 13 at the track!!
|
im not arguing with ya bro, just saying theres a lot of auto 93's that have gone 13's bone stock, i personally know of one and my 93 ran 13's stock also, but it was an m6
__________________
EB
99 Riviera, Bone stock, 14.34 @ 96 "Walking 5.0's in luxury" RIP
95 Cherokee, Bone stock 16.2 @ 83 "Treeing your 3rd gen and beating it to the line despite trapping less....and looking better"
93 TA, Bone stock, 13.8 @ 100 "Beating ****** drivers in ****** LS1's"
https://www.facebook.com/groups/285090241699967/
R.I.P. Tia
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 07:39 AM
|
#61
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 887
|
Did anyone figure out what the hell that car is that the Trans am eats up?
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 08:13 AM
|
#62
|
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
|

Modified 928?
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 08:41 AM
|
#63
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
|
That is.....A lotus Espirit like a 1995, with modified intakes on the back pillars, and a changed front bumper, and rear lower back bumper, but it is a Lotus.
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
|
Last edited by Blacdout96; 02-01-2010 at 08:44 AM.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 10:44 AM
|
#64
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 1,809
|
Pertaining to original post I would say that yes other than drivetrain awesomeness (both LT and LS motors) I would say theres no real "sweetness" to 4th gens like the other generations IMO.
The only reason I ever considered getting a 4th gen is because as was said, 12 second passes and 30mpg highway is awesome.
__________________
-Vinnie
94 2wd SBSC Gmt400. 330CI LSX, Fast 102, Trickflow 205s, close ratio nv3500, 4.30/trutrac.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 10:49 AM
|
#65
|
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacdout96
That is.....A lotus Espirit like a 1995, with modified intakes on the back pillars, and a changed front bumper, and rear lower back bumper, but it is a Lotus.
|
I am not seeing it, the back of the car isnt even the correct shape
Last edited by PolarBear; 02-01-2010 at 10:51 AM.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 11:22 AM
|
#66
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolarBear
I am not seeing it, the back of the car isnt even the correct shape

|
which is why reading is FTL with you. they were modified. have to remember GM owned a little share of Lotus, so I wouldn't be suprised if they plucked one to use for hte commercial. I can't see them jeopardizing a small claim they ahve, let alone , to embarrass a n established sports car company.
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 11:28 AM
|
#67
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 887
|
I would go with the Modified Lotus. The front end has the most similarity. The rear end has more Lambo. Remember the Red Lambo in the Rocky 4. That looks more like that one. The black one he drove had a more square rear on it.
Last edited by firebirdcrazy; 02-01-2010 at 11:31 AM.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 11:51 AM
|
#68
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 1,358
|
I know its not, but the rear looks like an Aston Martin or even a Maserati almost
__________________
1969 Camaro SS - 350 w/ some work done.
2010 F-150
Last edited by T69SS; 02-01-2010 at 11:51 AM.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 12:04 PM
|
#69
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 887
|
I emailed a pontiac editor so hopefully he gets back to me with an answer lol
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 12:24 PM
|
#70
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
|
lol, brilliant!!!
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 01:47 PM
|
#71
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 887
|
My answer from the Pontiac editor was a Kit Car. Best they got for me. Unbelievable lol
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 01:53 PM
|
#72
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
|
I highly doubt they made a kit car for that commercial, body kit maybe ,but not a whole car.
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 02:02 PM
|
#73
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 887
|
If they had used a real car they would have had to pay for the rights so I can see that I guess.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 02:03 PM
|
#74
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by firebirdcrazy
If they had used a real car they would have had to pay for the rights so I can see that I guess.
|
Yes, exactly. Plus the car does not have to run, or even move.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 02:08 PM
|
#75
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing/Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,904
|
looks like a crossfire ate a dsm and **** that thing out
__________________
EB
99 Riviera, Bone stock, 14.34 @ 96 "Walking 5.0's in luxury" RIP
95 Cherokee, Bone stock 16.2 @ 83 "Treeing your 3rd gen and beating it to the line despite trapping less....and looking better"
93 TA, Bone stock, 13.8 @ 100 "Beating ****** drivers in ****** LS1's"
https://www.facebook.com/groups/285090241699967/
R.I.P. Tia
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|