 |
|
12-06-2012, 12:15 PM
|
#26
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z28 Heritage
Good old Northstar hating haha its a great motor but with piss poor problems.
|
I don't mind working on them anymore. Could be worse, I'd work on Northstars all day if I could avoid seeing another Catera.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 01:40 PM
|
#27
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
was that the early cadillac 3.6 with bad timing chain?
|
Yup. Those were from a 2005 STS with a broken chain. I must of jinxed myself cause I just got a 2012 CTS Coupe with no compression in cylinder 4...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevoone
I don't mind working on them anymore. Could be worse, I'd work on Northstars all day if I could avoid seeing another Catera.
|
Amen. I have a Catera staring at me right now that is kicking my ass.
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 10:20 PM
|
#28
|
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
dat soot
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 02:07 AM
|
#29
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a van down by the river.
Posts: 1,040
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevoone
I don't mind working on them anymore. Could be worse, I'd work on Northstars all day if I could avoid seeing another Catera.
|
I hate Catera's! That's why i went the Northstar route. Great motor good power and i love the sound of em on WOT.
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 07:16 AM
|
#30
|
|
Meet Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,367
|
Cateras :shudder:
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 07:29 AM
|
#31
|
|
Power Member/NJFBOA Bookie/Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Jersey = Best Jersey.
Posts: 4,435
|
While on the subject of Catera's: The first generation "Catera Touring Sedan" wasn't D.I., IIRC... just a 2.8L & 3.6L V6s with VVT. I know the 3.2L was the Opel motor, and had it's quirks, but how how do you mechanics & techs feel about the 2.8 & 3.6 VVT motors in 04-07 CTSes?
__________________
1995 Firebird... Stock-ish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Good. He microwaved my phone 6 years ago, i hope his intake erupts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 08:45 AM
|
#32
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Highland Mills, NY
Posts: 1,915
|
What car is that LTblow?
__________________
2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 08:48 AM
|
#33
|
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
EGR valve off a Duramax
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 08:50 AM
|
#34
|
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Regret rolling coal now?
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 08:53 AM
|
#35
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hackettstown, NJ
Posts: 1,663
|
Choked up diesel junker, I see no problem.
__________________
1998 Z-28 - SLP lid - Ported TB - LS6 Intake - Dynatech SS headers/Catted Y - Magnaflow Exh - 3.42 - Yank SS3600 - UMI weld-in subframe connectors, Adj LCA, Adj PHB, Q1A TA - Bolt-in Relocation Brackets - Strano springs - Koni shocks - 17" C6Z06 wheels - 326HP/335ft-lbs - 12.35 @ 110.41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbirdws6
I can appreciate a dream but this person needed some real friends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 09:36 AM
|
#36
|
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT
Regret rolling coal now?
|
Not my truck and AFAIK that was off a high mileage, 300k+ stock motor. EGR systems combined with a PCV system FTL.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 09:59 AM
|
#37
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jersey Mike
While on the subject of Catera's: The first generation "Catera Touring Sedan" wasn't D.I., IIRC... just a 2.8L & 3.6L V6s with VVT. I know the 3.2L was the Opel motor, and had it's quirks, but how how do you mechanics & techs feel about the 2.8 & 3.6 VVT motors in 04-07 CTSes?
|
They didn't start DI until recently, last 4-5 years. No Catera had DI, just 2.8 and 3.2's.
I'll work on new(new to me is 04-up) CTS's all day.
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 10:11 AM
|
#38
|
|
Power Member/NJFBOA Bookie/Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Jersey = Best Jersey.
Posts: 4,435
|
Good to hear! Considering getting back into a 1st gen V6 CTS as a replacement DD. I think outside of timing chain issues/maintenance, the 3.6L was pretty safe. The 3.2L had CPS-related no start nightmares, but I haven't heard much about the 2.8L as far as reliability. I don't want to get this derailed (because those pictures MyFirstZ posted are absurd, and I'm hoping he'll follow up after the new head is installed), but have you heard of, or experienced any reoccurring issues with those cars? If so, I'd like to take this to PMs when you have time.
__________________
1995 Firebird... Stock-ish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow
Good. He microwaved my phone 6 years ago, i hope his intake erupts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 10:19 AM
|
#39
|
|
Admin.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTb1ow
Not my truck and AFAIK that was off a high mileage, 300k+ stock motor. EGR systems combined with a PCV system FTL.
|
yes terrible for 300,000 miles lol
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!
The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.
Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.
Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 11:25 AM
|
#40
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jersey Mike
If so, I'd like to take this to PMs when you have time.
|
PM sent.
Update on the Bimmer?
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2012, 04:47 PM
|
#41
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Highland Mills, NY
Posts: 1,915
|
Finished already. Car runs like a top. Think the customer picked up today. Was done yesterday morning.
Just wanted to show the valves and head. All the valve train was swapped over to a brand new stock head. Didn't think it was picture worthy lol sorry
__________________
2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56
Last edited by MyFirstZ; 12-07-2012 at 04:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 04:36 AM
|
#42
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 222
|
Nice
Last edited by Mezzy; 12-16-2012 at 10:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 08:18 AM
|
#43
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Highland Mills, NY
Posts: 1,915
|
Again fuel treatment will not work on valves like this.
Its direct injection. The fuel is squirt right into the combustion chamber instead of the intake port so the valves will not see any fuel or cleaner.
__________________
2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 08:46 AM
|
#44
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 540
|
Higher octane fuel does not increase power or reduce the amount of carbon buildup. The higher octane rating is related to the fuels ability to avoid predetination in higher performance or forced induction engines. If the manufacturer of your car recommends regular, running premium will offer no benefit. However if you run regular in a car recommended to run on premium you could cause issues.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating
When I had my 04 Ram (mid grade fuel was recommended) the owners manual actually said use of premium fuel is not necessary and continued use may cause adverse affects to performance and mileage.
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 08:55 AM
|
#45
|
|
Token v6 Guy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: No longer neon land :(
Posts: 5,703
|
A simple nitrous system would clear that carbon build up nicely 
__________________
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 - 12.079 at 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO - stage 4+ tune and an intake - no times yet
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 09:25 AM
|
#46
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Highland Mills, NY
Posts: 1,915
|
I did the next best thing. Replace the head lol
__________________
2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 09:38 AM
|
#47
|
|
Meet Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,367
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevoone
Higher octane fuel does not increase power or reduce the amount of carbon buildup. The higher octane rating is related to the fuels ability to avoid predetination in higher performance or forced induction engines. If the manufacturer of your car recommends regular, running premium will offer no benefit. However if you run regular in a car recommended to run on premium you could cause issues.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating
When I had my 04 Ram (mid grade fuel was recommended) the owners manual actually said use of premium fuel is not necessary and continued use may cause adverse affects to performance and mileage. |
I think that most premium fuels have a little more detergent in them so that could probably help the slightest bit in carbon build up. The fact that this is a direct injection engine makes his post quite funny though
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 10:29 AM
|
#48
|
|
11 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 4,620
|
Wow, you guys get the tough jobs... we would just R&R a new longblock for anything like this...
__________________
1999 Z28 Convertible. 6 speed swap, wide cowl hood, full hockey stripes, and a whining 10 bolt.
2008 Sierra Vortec Max. 6.2 swapped, headers, Magnaflow catback, GMPP CAI, NHT optioned tow package.
2006 GTO, 11.48 @ 118.3
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 10:51 AM
|
#49
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider
The fact that this is a direct injection engine makes his post quite funny though |
Not sure if that was directed at my post or at Mezzy. Earlier in the thread I also noted that there is no fuel flow past the valves on a DI engine so conventional fuel system treatments are useless in DI applications for valve deposits. My last post was just a response to Mezzy's comment about only running premium grade fuels.
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 11:40 AM
|
#50
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Highland Mills, NY
Posts: 1,915
|
I think it was directed at mezzy.
My diagnosis for the head actually had nothing to do with the carbon build up. This was just something I knew was going to be resolved as well.
That being said it was not warranty. After replacement they authorized good will but regardless the car did not need a long block. Leak down and compression where both ok.
__________________
2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
