Quote:
Originally Posted by Buoniconti81
From: those of us who spent time in the military, believe in our military and support the men and women of our military, read on............. ~
John Glenn (DEMOCRAT) said this ----- It should make you think a little:
There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.
In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the
month of January. That's just one American city,
about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq .
When some claim that President Bush shouldn't
have started this war, state the following:
|
Lets get crackin...
Quote:
FDR (DEMOCRAT) led us into World War II.
Germany never attacked us ; Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ...
an aver age of 112,500 per year.
|
Are you serious? Maybe we should have just sat back and let everyone just rail on us? Japan made a DIRECT ATTACK ON AN AMERICAN MILITARY BASE!!!! IT WIPED OUT 90% OF OUR PACIFIC FLEET in a matter of HOURS.
We declaired war on Japan, and then Germany declaired war on America. To have the BALLS to compare WWII to this ******** Bush has gotten us into takes levels of ******* unseen on the internet till now. I know you did not write all that, but cut and pasted it from somewhere, so do not take that as a direct attack on you, but I do question whoever uses this as truth or something to make a point on.
Quote:
Truman (DEMOCRAT) finished that war and started one in Korea
North Korea never attacked us
From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost .
an average of 18,334 per year.
|
North Korea attacked South Korea in an attempt to reunite the country after it was divided by Russian/Chinese backed Communisim vs American/Nato backed Democracy. North Korea moved first, in which Ameirca helped, as the Russians and Chinese did for the North. Again, the context of how the war started was REAL. The spread of communisim is what we wanted to stop. The Domino effect of nations falling to Communisim is what we wanted to stop.
Quote:
John F. Kennedy (DEMOCRAT) started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.
Vietnam never attacked us.
|
We never faught in Vietnam then, we sent in advisors to help support Democratic and Ameircan friendly South Vietnam against the Communist North. We were in support, not in an offensive.
Quote:
Johnson ( DEMOCRAT) turned Vietnam into a quagmire.
From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost
an average of 5,800 per year.
|
Vietnam was a quagmire for other reasons, not cause he was a democrat. We went into Vietnam to prevent the spread, not to attack. It was a massive police action, and a waste of people. We did not fight a war. We were in a constant ambush. Much like we are today. We went to full war after a overhyped Gulf of Tomkin attack on a Navy patrol boat. What followed was in fact a waste.
Quote:
Clinton (DEMOCRAT) went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.
Bosnia never attacked us.
He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three
times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on
multiple occasions.
|
We went into Bosina to stop the ethnic cleansing that was going on in levels that havent been seen in Europe since Hitler decided to take out 11 million people. And what did we do? We marched in, we got the people we wanted, we brought that assbag President Milosavich to the Hage and he was sent into a prision cell. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!
But nooooo that was all a rouse!! Its cause Clinton was getting a BLOW JOB!! Thats it!! Thats why we went in!!!
OH yeah? 3 times?
I remember when Clinton wanted to take military action against a chemical wepons plant, that the people and Repubulicans wanted NOT to send in troops, but find an easier way. So we sent in several tomahawks and blew it off the face of the earth. And still...Clinton did it to hide his blowjob.
Quote:
In the years since terrorists attacked us , President Bush
has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled
al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya , Iran , and, North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. And the Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking.
|
********!! LIberated two countries?
Crushed the Taliban?
Crippled Al-Qaida?
Liberated ZERO. Iraq is in a constant civil war, and people are dying while Americans are caught in the crossfire.
Afganastan is not only NOT Liberated, Al-Qaida and the Taliban have INCREASED power more then pre-war levels!! That means that they are stronger then they were then BEFORE we went in!! And the longer we are in Iraq and Afganastan, the more terror groups gain strength and power. The Western world has invaded there space.
Quote:
But Wait, There's more!
It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno (DEMOCRAT)
to take the Branch Davidian compound.
That was a 51-day operation..
Isn't she a sight???
We've been looking for evidence for chemical weapons
in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton (DEMOCRAT) to find
the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the
Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard
than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his
Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.
It took less time to take Iraq than it took
to count the votes in Florida !!!
|
Sorry we didnt lauch a full invasion into the Branch building, and sort out the bodies first. What happend that day was tragic, no doubt and none of it was Reno's fault. You cannot just launch an attack on a bunch of people in a building, who have wepons and ready to die. Especially when its on national tv 24.7.
Great for the 3rd, but what happend since? Great, we invaded a country and took over its capital faster then America could keep up. We marched over a half assed military, in which for all we know sat thier wepons down, waited til we got into the country, and have caused a long drawn out battle over these years?
Quote:
Our Commander-In-Chief is doing a GREAT JOB !
The Military morale is high!
|
******** on both counts. I have friends that have come back. Morale is low. Everyone is scared. No one wants to be there. We have entered what Bush's father said he didnt want to do. He did not want a long drawn out battle in the streets of Bagdad, where American troops would be caught in a deadly battle. He did not want to have another Vietnam. Apparently Bush Jr didnt listen to that, must have been nose deep in some coke maybe?
