Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2005, 03:08 PM   #1
camaroracer1992
10 Second Club
 
camaroracer1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hatfield, PA
Posts: 1,292
iTrader: (7)
tire size ? for the front

i currently run MT sportsman 26x7.50 tires on the front of my camaro which is used mainly for racing. i have to pull the tires off this winter to do screw in valve stems. my question is is there a benefit to buy the 28's they make or not? i know its more rotational weight but didnt know if there were any more benefits???
__________________
_________________________

Procharged/intercooled 406 Shafirorff with FAST XFI
Sponsors:
Boccellas Performance http://www.boccellasperformance.com/
Spohn suspension
http://www.spohn.net/
camaroracer1992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 03:31 PM   #2
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
tire height is more for roll out when bracket racing. front tires don't really do much either way for et as far as height goes.
i woudl suggest getting some real skinnies though. dropping some weight is always a good plan, unsprung from the front of the car is super nice, and the narrower tread would create less rolling resistance down track

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 03:38 PM   #3
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
tire height is more for roll out when bracket racing. front tires don't really do much either way for et as far as height goes.
i woudl suggest getting some real skinnies though. dropping some weight is always a good plan, unsprung from the front of the car is super nice, and the narrower tread would create less rolling resistance down track

later
tim
[hijack]did running those 19s on the front of my car at the track really hurt my et that much? or is the difference neglible.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 03:47 PM   #4
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
it definately hurt. that is all mass that isn't doing you any good. i woudl bet that each front wheel+tire weighs over 65lbs, now look at a pair of draglites with bias ply skinnies, around 15lbs each.
unsprung weight like a wheel also isn't doin any work to help the car hook. it doesn't move, it jsut drags on the ground and fights the car.
the narrower tire means that less rubber is hitting the road, less tire on the ground means less rubber that is resisting acceleration.
i know when i switched from 17's to skinnies on my thirdgen i knocked a little over a tenth off. that was with M/T 8ply(my car was still full weight ) fronts though, with a 2 or 4 ply front it would have been even lighter and i would have knocked off more.

later
tim
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 03:48 PM   #5
jrsfast84
 
jrsfast84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: easton,pa
Posts: 535
iTrader: (1)
I'm going to run the Phoenix F/X,(firestones) 7.75 - 15 ( PH-15), there 28.3" tall, 89"circ.,for next year, i like the tall tire gets the car off the ground and i can set my suspension set low, Tim is right get 15 x 3.5" rims with skinnys,what slicks do you have on rears, get the matching fronts in skinnys. JR1.
jrsfast84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 03:57 PM   #6
camaroracer1992
10 Second Club
 
camaroracer1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hatfield, PA
Posts: 1,292
iTrader: (7)
front 15x4 TT2 polished with MT sportsman 26x7.50/15
rear 16x8 TT2 Polished with MT ET/Street 28x11.50/16
__________________
_________________________

Procharged/intercooled 406 Shafirorff with FAST XFI
Sponsors:
Boccellas Performance http://www.boccellasperformance.com/
Spohn suspension
http://www.spohn.net/
camaroracer1992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 04:08 PM   #7
bitchincamaro
 
bitchincamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: south jersey
Posts: 484
iTrader: (0)
i am running a 28x7.50 m/t sportsmans. i've never ran anything else so not much for comparison.
bitchincamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 10:01 PM   #8
camaroracer1992
10 Second Club
 
camaroracer1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hatfield, PA
Posts: 1,292
iTrader: (7)
i like the larger tire for the ground clearance... i have issues with teh nose scrapping at times in the trailer going up the ramp
__________________
_________________________

Procharged/intercooled 406 Shafirorff with FAST XFI
Sponsors:
Boccellas Performance http://www.boccellasperformance.com/
Spohn suspension
http://www.spohn.net/
camaroracer1992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.