Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-14-2005, 01:55 PM   #1
ar0ck
Resident Camera Guy
 
ar0ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 10,971
iTrader: (2)
Social Networks:

Simple Turbo Idea

I was reading mufflex's website (a local custom exhaust place, huge reputation) and read they can do custom turbo applications for everything from custom headers, y-pipes, down-pipes, intake pipes, and intercooler fabrication. I got this random idea, of one really simple and relativly cheap set-up.

Running on the stock manifolds, have Mufflex fabriacate a reverse y-pipe towards the front of the car, to come up into a single turbo set up (behind the radiator, between the motor). From their the turbo would be wherever it fits (most likely right side of the engine bay where the intake & traction controll box would be relocated) and run it into a side mounted intercooler (probably the lower right side of the front of the car, where a regular intake would sit [ATI makes twin intercoolers that sit their]) then turbo back I would run out a 3" down-pipe to my existing 3" magnaflow without a catalytic converter. Pipes would then need to be made to an intercooler and back to the intake. This would obviously also require some fuel support like a 255lb/hr pump and larger injectors (tuned).

All I would need is the turbo, wastegate (if not intergrated), BOV, boost guage, fuel pump, injectors & a tune. Plus whatever it costs to have the pipes fabricated.

It would be a low boost application just to have some cool factor and that extra get up and go. I think thats about it? Does anyone have any input?

I think that it? Does anyone have any suggestions, Ideas, Thoughts?
__________________

Last edited by ar0ck; 12-14-2005 at 04:20 PM.
ar0ck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 04:25 PM   #2
Savage_Messiah
2007 Member of the Year
 
Savage_Messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seabrook, TX
Posts: 14,281
iTrader: (1)
Mufflex is a pretty good shop, yea, but be prepared to pay a lot of money
__________________
WF=DF

Kommandant
of the ACL (Anti Canadian League)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTb1ow View Post
Junk the pos, spend the money on beer, acquire headache.

Same result cept this headache doesnt last months.
Savage_Messiah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 04:44 PM   #3
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,080
iTrader: (12)
the engine corssmember does create a little obstacle with your idea. Other than that its possible, but still cheaper in the end to buy a full kit i would think.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 04:55 PM   #4
Pampered-Z
Sliderule / Moderator
 
Pampered-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Catawissa PA
Posts: 2,294
iTrader: (1)
Buy the time you purchased everything separately and paid for the custom work you would be way over the price of just buying a kit.

BTW: Mufflex is great! Denny does all the exhaust work on my cars. His latest was the custom 3" Y-Pipe, I have the 4" cat back, and he built custom piping for my supercharger -> intercooler -> intake. and you will pay for his skill and top quality work! ( as it should be!!).
__________________
93Z M6 Black: The 385 Lives! Supercharged, 3-core front mount intercooler, GTP heads, 3:73's, Street twin clutch, Jethot Longtubes, Mufflex 4" catback/spintech, S+W cage, Spohn Suspenion, Yada Yada Yada

1) Build it
2) Race it
3) Break it
4) Repeat!!!
Pampered-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 05:04 PM   #5
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,693
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

there are a couple of budget kits out there for 3 or 4k. mufflex just charged my buddy 800 for a custom catback for a VW. if a catback for a VW is 800 i can only imagine how much hot parts for a turbo setup are. a turbo head unit is about 1k also.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 05:05 PM   #6
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
remote mount the bitch...you could use your existing exhaust just !cat and have them run the tubing connecting the turbo to the existing exhaust which should be cheap & easy and have them run the intake tubing back up front...the fabrication work would probably still run you about a grand but total outlay of the kit if you do it yourself should be less then 3 grand. Thats with everything turbo, oil lines, fuel injectors, tuning, etc.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 05:07 PM   #7
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by qwikz28
a turbo head unit is about 1k also.
you can find head units without a bov built in for less then $800 new in alot of cases...depends what your looking for.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 06:17 PM   #8
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,693
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by foff667
remote mount the bitch...you could use your existing exhaust just !cat and have them run the tubing connecting the turbo to the existing exhaust which should be cheap & easy and have them run the intake tubing back up front...the fabrication work would probably still run you about a grand but total outlay of the kit if you do it yourself should be less then 3 grand. Thats with everything turbo, oil lines, fuel injectors, tuning, etc.
how about a remote oiling system?

and alex, you are slightly ahead of the game with the upgraded fuel pump
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 06:25 PM   #9
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
for standard or remote mount you can tap into any available pressure side oil source. the remote mount will require a a supplimental pump to run the oil back to the engine.
there are sources for oil next to the oil filter, rear of the block, and there are places you cna even drill and tap if you want.
LT1's have lots of oil available.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 06:53 PM   #10
Ian
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
iTrader: (7)
a lot of guys use S-10 V8 conversion shorty headers and flip them upside down and swap side to side.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434 View Post
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 07:05 PM   #11
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,693
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
for standard or remote mount you can tap into any available pressure side oil source. the remote mount will require a a supplimental pump to run the oil back to the engine.
there are sources for oil next to the oil filter, rear of the block, and there are places you cna even drill and tap if you want.
LT1's have lots of oil available.
but what about an extra oil tank for the turbo? that would be the one thing holding me back from rear mount as opposed to an engine bay turbo
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 08:46 PM   #12
ar0ck
Resident Camera Guy
 
ar0ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 10,971
iTrader: (2)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian
a lot of guys use S-10 V8 conversion shorty headers and flip them upside down and swap side to side.
I had thought about that route before but on a standard 350 SBC, I would think the exhaust is different when it comes to an LT1, Unless they make conversion LT1 headers for S-10 applications then Im in buisness.

I have found a few hot parts in the $1k+ range for LT1's but the amount of actual kits is very very low. And theirs not many people running them to give me the confidence in purchasing one. Most of the turbo LT1 set ups I have seen on the net are custom big buck jobs

No rear mounts, my car looks good as it is on the outside, it needs more attention in the engine bay and go fast department.
__________________
ar0ck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 09:30 PM   #13
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransAm4Life
I had thought about that route before but on a standard 350 SBC, I would think the exhaust is different when it comes to an LT1, Unless they make conversion LT1 headers for S-10 applications then Im in buisness.

I have found a few hot parts in the $1k+ range for LT1's but the amount of actual kits is very very low. And theirs not many people running them to give me the confidence in purchasing one. Most of the turbo LT1 set ups I have seen on the net are custom big buck jobs

No rear mounts, my car looks good as it is on the outside, it needs more attention in the engine bay and go fast department.
yes they make lt1 conversion headers fwiw
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 09:32 PM   #14
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by qwikz28
but what about an extra oil tank for the turbo? that would be the one thing holding me back from rear mount as opposed to an engine bay turbo
an extra oil tank? They get fed with engine oil...the same stuff that lubricates your engine...you run an oil line to the turbo and then a line back to the engine usually using a pump. I think the sts setup just dumps the oil through the oil filler cap.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 09:35 PM   #15
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransAm4Life
I have found a few hot parts in the $1k+ range for LT1's but the amount of actual kits is very very low. And theirs not many people running them to give me the confidence in purchasing one. Most of the turbo LT1 set ups I have seen on the net are custom big buck jobs

No rear mounts, my car looks good as it is on the outside, it needs more attention in the engine bay and go fast department.
a front mount setup is going to be a big buck job no matter how you look at it with many bends that all need to be test fit, tacked, removed then welded. Guaranteed at least 2-4 grand in labor & parts from mufflex...doing a rear mount for mufflex is about as difficult as two custom catback setups which aint hard.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 10:09 PM   #16
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,693
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by foff667
an extra oil tank? They get fed with engine oil...the same stuff that lubricates your engine...you run an oil line to the turbo and then a line back to the engine usually using a pump. I think the sts setup just dumps the oil through the oil filler cap.
i dont like the idea of running an oil line the length of the car. i would much rather have the extra oil tank and pump
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 10:13 PM   #17
Ian
Banned Camp Director Emeritus
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerset County
Posts: 8,395
iTrader: (7)
Quote:
Originally Posted by foff667
yes they make lt1 conversion headers fwiw
[hijack]

what is the difference? I thought the exhaust ports and bolt holes were the same.

[/hijack]
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddest434 View Post
and 1 more smart ass answer by you and i'm going to reach into this monitor and grab you by the throat
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 10:18 PM   #18
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian
[hijack]

what is the difference? I thought the exhaust ports and bolt holes were the same.

[/hijack]
they very well might be...i just know there are a few companies that make lt1 conversion ones.
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 10:43 PM   #19
bad64chevelle
I will beat you with a toaster!
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,054
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by qwikz28
there are a couple of budget kits out there for 3 or 4k. mufflex just charged my buddy 800 for a custom catback for a VW. if a catback for a VW is 800 i can only imagine how much hot parts for a turbo setup are. a turbo head unit is about 1k also.
Or the fact that they got paint all over the bottom side of the car...
__________________
___________________
bad64chevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 10:45 PM   #20
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,693
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

yeah my friend was not happy with mufflex's work at the absolute least. but he is picky as hell. which he has every right to be for that much money
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 10:47 PM   #21
bad64chevelle
I will beat you with a toaster!
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,054
iTrader: (3)
for 800 bucks though...damn
__________________
___________________
bad64chevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 05:55 PM   #22
turbo96z28
 
turbo96z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth Amboy
Posts: 2,307
iTrader: (0)
before you rule out remote mounts, heres what i can say..........having the oil lines and intake tube running under the length of the car definetley help. you'd be amazed how much cooler everything runs which amounts to alot less wear and tear on the engine than a normal front mount adds. you only lose an un-noticable amount of boost and the lag is comparable to most front mounts. the STS kit is a bolt-on and comes off just as easy if you ever sell the car or want to use it on another F-bod with the same engine. there's one guy with a profile on STS's site that is making 522hp at the wheels through the stock exhaust with stock heads. they are incredible units and run roughly about $4000 for a 5psi kit. i'd highly recommend it for the ease of install and the noticable power difference.
__________________
Billy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 88ta5spd
BTW - Bottles are for babies, real men get blown. that is all
- R.I.P. Buddy List 1/21/06 - 5/3/06...we knew you well.
- Pancake Bunny Club Member #1
- F the Plane! - Member #3


I979CamaroDiva: im in my own little zoon
I979CamaroDiva: zone even
lostsoul1006: lmao
I979CamaroDiva: wtf is a zoon

Last edited by turbo96z28; 12-16-2005 at 09:46 PM.
turbo96z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 06:06 PM   #23
ar0ck
Resident Camera Guy
 
ar0ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 10,971
iTrader: (2)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo96z28
before you rule out remote mounts, heres what i can say..........having the oil lines and intake tube definetley help. you'd be amazed how much cooler everything runs which amounts to alot less wear and tear on the engine than a normal front mount adds. you only lose an un-noticable amount of boost and the lag is comparable to most front mounts. the STS kit is a bolt-on and comes off just as easy if you ever sell the car or want to use it on another F-bod with the same engine. there's one guy with a profile on STS's site that is making 522hp at the wheels through the stock exhaust with stock heads. they are incredible units and run roughly about $4000 for a 5psi kit. i'd highly recommend it for the ease of install and the noticable power difference.
Totally understandable! I have looked into an STS kit, we have a member on the Boards 2000OrangeSS running a well supported STS kit.
__________________
ar0ck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 08:12 PM   #24
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,693
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo96z28
before you rule out remote mounts, heres what i can say..........having the oil lines and intake tube definetley help. you'd be amazed how much cooler everything runs which amounts to alot less wear and tear on the engine than a normal front mount adds. you only lose an un-noticable amount of boost and the lag is comparable to most front mounts. the STS kit is a bolt-on and comes off just as easy if you ever sell the car or want to use it on another F-bod with the same engine. there's one guy with a profile on STS's site that is making 522hp at the wheels through the stock exhaust with stock heads. they are incredible units and run roughly about $4000 for a 5psi kit. i'd highly recommend it for the ease of install and the noticable power difference.
what do you mean by that? you can run a turbo without oil?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 09:44 PM   #25
turbo96z28
 
turbo96z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth Amboy
Posts: 2,307
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by qwikz28
what do you mean by that? you can run a turbo without oil?

ooops....forgot part of that sentence.......thanks for pointing it out.

add in: running under the length of the car

sorry bout that, edited my post.
__________________
Billy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 88ta5spd
BTW - Bottles are for babies, real men get blown. that is all
- R.I.P. Buddy List 1/21/06 - 5/3/06...we knew you well.
- Pancake Bunny Club Member #1
- F the Plane! - Member #3


I979CamaroDiva: im in my own little zoon
I979CamaroDiva: zone even
lostsoul1006: lmao
I979CamaroDiva: wtf is a zoon

Last edited by turbo96z28; 12-16-2005 at 09:46 PM.
turbo96z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Engine / Power / Tuning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.