 |
04-19-2009, 07:54 PM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
Time For New Heads....But Which Ones?
Hey everyone. I've had my 383 LT1 for about 3+ years now and IMO it doesn't quite seem to be as powerful as I think it should be. Could the fact that I have near stock heads on the car be why? That's a good start. The heads I am running right now are stock heads, but ported and polished with stainless valves, heavy duty springs, and that's about it! Not to mention my valve sizes are stock! From my understanding, the heads on an LT1 can be very restrictive, and with a stroker motor fighting to make power, I feel as even though I have slight head work done, I am not near the potential of power I could be making. So without getting into too much detail about the engine specs and all that I am looking for some opinions on heads, and valve sizing that i should lean towards. If anyone has any first hand experience or just general knowledge that'd be great.
I have been looking at Patriot Performance and AFR leaning towards a 2.02 / 1.60 valve sizing. And as for the cc I don't know if I head towards 195cc or 215 cc or even if there is something else out there. I also saw an intake valve size of 2.08 as an option but I'm really not that familiar with what is good. i will also be adding hardened pushrods and 1.6
roller rockers.
How much are the heads I have on now really hurting me.......
My 383 is naturally asperated if that helps. Well thanks everyone -
Giovanni
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
Last edited by Gio93z; 04-19-2009 at 07:55 PM.
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 07:57 PM
|
#2
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
|
Street car or race car?
Whats the operating range of the motor?
Cam in it now?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:00 PM
|
#3
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
stay away from patriot for 1, afr make the best street bolt on head, stock heads on a 383 is def. gonna choke performance. without knowing what rpm range u want to spin and without knowing cam size, intake, injector size, exhaust system, compression,etc...etc..etc... i cant tell u which head is best. although i can tell u that on a 406 with 195's they can make 550hp+ on pump gas. and excellent street ability. u can pm me for more details if needed.
__________________
TMR performance
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:28 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
street car that sees the strip sometimes for fun
30lb injectors
pacesetter long tube headers with y pipe to an SLP LM1 cat back
58mm TB
ported intake manifold
ss ram air intake
i believe compression is about 10.9:1
intake/exhaust lift 372/372
intake/exhaust duration @ 0.50" 240/244
does that help?
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:30 PM
|
#5
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
|
What kind of rotating assembly did you use?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:34 PM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
eagle forged rotating assembly with.....SRP pistons....
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:36 PM
|
#7
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio93z
street car that sees the strip sometimes for fun
30lb injectors
pacesetter long tube headers with y pipe to an SLP LM1 cat back
58mm TB
ported intake manifold
ss ram air intake
i believe compression is about 10.9:1
intake/exhaust lift 372/372
intake/exhaust duration @ 0.50" 240/244
does that help?
|
it helps,
that cam lift is at the valve? or at .050?
lobe sep?
intake centerline?
cylinder head and piston cc?
__________________
TMR performance
Last edited by camaroAL; 04-19-2009 at 08:36 PM.
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:40 PM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
i dont have an answer to any of those last questions you asked me.....as for the cc of the heads, i mean...they are stock basically so i'm not sure....
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:47 PM
|
#9
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
well judging from the info provided, i wouldnt use anything larger than a 195 head.
this will keep your engine very torquey and make a good range of usable power.
if needed i can set u up with a pair
__________________
TMR performance
Last edited by camaroAL; 04-19-2009 at 08:48 PM.
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 08:57 PM
|
#10
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
|
Just found this link on AFRs, gets good after the first page or two.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt...ads-lt1-3.html
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
Last edited by LTb1ow; 04-19-2009 at 08:57 PM.
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 09:27 PM
|
#11
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shownomercy
|
as for u that dont know, tony mamo who is on that forum, is afr, he is the designer of all afr heads.
__________________
TMR performance
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 09:29 PM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
so basically AFR is a real good choice? or AFR is a real good choice but there are lesser expensive heads that can do the same thing?
.....i think AFR is what I'm looking for.....i've only heard real good things about them....
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 09:32 PM
|
#13
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
|
Eh, you can have your stock heads ported to outflow the AFRs unported, but you have more potential with the AFRs for later on. All depends on your goals with the car, the AFRs can grow with you.
And your swapping cams I hope?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 09:34 PM
|
#14
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio93z
so basically AFR is a real good choice? or AFR is a real good choice but there are lesser expensive heads that can do the same thing?
.....i think AFR is what I'm looking for.....i've only heard real good things about them....
|
there may be less expensive heads out there, will they provide the same power ? possibly?
why f around, when u know you have found a good product that will get u the power u want.... i dont only use afr, but highly recommend them, especially in ur case
__________________
TMR performance
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 09:39 PM
|
#15
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
well it has a cam in it already....so no i wasnt planning on swapping to a new/different cam...i was just under the impression that with stock sized valves, i am not doing myself any favors......
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 09:43 PM
|
#16
|
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
|
Well, you won't gain much if your cam is not matched the flow numbers of your heads...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
|
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 09:51 PM
|
#17
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
hmm.....well now i dont know what to do - i dont understand enough about cam specs and head flow and all that to try and start matching cams and heads.....i guess i will have to do some research....too bad...i just wanted to throw some heads on there.....i dont really plan on swapping my cam out - so i wonder if the heads I have now flow well with the cam i have...putting me at my max power output for my motor....that would suck quite a bit....
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#18
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
Part Number: 109651 Grind Number: HR-302-2S-10.04 IG
Engine Identification:
Start Yr. End Yr. Make Cyl Description
1987 Up CHEVROLET 8 ROUGH IDLE, PERFORMANCE USAGE, GOOD UPPER RPM TORQUE AND HP, BRACKET RACING, AUTO TRANS W/3500+ CONVERTER, 4200-5000 CRUISE RPM, 10.5 TO 12.0 COMPRESSION RATIO ADVISED, 370+ CU. IN., SUPERCHARGED AND/OR NITROUS, 1.040" BASE CIRCLE FOR LONG STROKE CLEARANCE. BASIC RPM 3500-7000
Engine Size Configuration
305-350 C.I. V
Valve Setting: Intake .000 Exhaust .000 HOT
Lift: Intake @Cam 372 @Valve 558 All Lifts are based
on zero lash and theoretical rocker arm ratios.
Exhaust @ Cam 372 @Valve 558
Rocker Arm Ratio 1.50
Cam Timing: TAPPET @.004
Lift: Opens Closes ADV Duration
Intake 42.0 BTDC 80.0 ABDC 302 °
Exhaust 84.0 BBDC 42.0 ATDC 306 °
Spring Requirements: Triple Dual Outer Inner
Part Number 99846
Loads Closed 125 LBS @ 1.800 or 1 13/16
Open 321 LBS @ 1.350
Recommended RPM range with matching components
Minimum RPM 3200
Maximum RPM 7200
Valve Float 7200
Cam Timing: TAPPET @.050
Lift: Opens Closes Max Lift Duration
Intake 15.0 BTDC 45.0 ABDC 105 240 °
Exhaust 57.0 BBDC 7.0 ATDC 115 244 °
Remarks:
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:07 PM
|
#19
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
that is the crane cam that i believe i have ...... basing that on the information i was given when the motor was built ...i am taking that minimal cam information that i gave 'you' early in the post and matching it upto what crane cams web site offers.......
that seems to be the only match .......
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:09 PM
|
#20
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
ur heads are too small for that cam. bolting on a set of 195's will feel like a small shot of spray.
__________________
TMR performance
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:11 PM
|
#21
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
it would be nice to have the actual grind # off the cam to be 100% sure that that is the same cam u have.
__________________
TMR performance
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:27 PM
|
#22
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
ok i was getting worried for a second there....i knew when they built the motor that it was a respectable motor that could put out good numbers...i just wanted to help out my cause and i figured my weak spot was the heads.....everything that i thought i knew about the motor and the LT1's in general was telling me that my heads were inadequate for my bottom end......i will persue contacting crane themselves over the phone to get a better feel for my cam -
my dyno numbers were 360rwtq and 340 rwhp i just figured a better flowing head set up would push the numbers higher because i assumed the cam i have was an upgrade ..... so a good head set would just really open things up for her....
so a 195cc with a 2.02/1.60 sound like a good place to head for.....?
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:33 PM
|
#23
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio93z
ok i was getting worried for a second there....i knew when they built the motor that it was a respectable motor that could put out good numbers...i just wanted to help out my cause and i figured my weak spot was the heads.....everything that i thought i knew about the motor and the LT1's in general was telling me that my heads were inadequate for my bottom end......i will persue contacting crane themselves over the phone to get a better feel for my cam -
my dyno numbers were 360rwtq and 340 rwhp i just figured a better flowing head set up would push the numbers higher because i assumed the cam i have was an upgrade ..... so a good head set would just really open things up for her....
so a 195cc with a 2.02/1.60 sound like a good place to head for.....?
|
if that is actually ur cam specs, a 195 with i believe 2.050 intake valves, will be just fine.
if u want my honest opinion, go with the competition package with the 2.080. more money but well worth it.
__________________
TMR performance
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:36 PM
|
#24
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Milford, North Jersey
Posts: 129
|
yea i saw those.....i didnt know if that would be overkill or not....but i will double/triple check my cam situation tomorrow and assuming the info. that i gave you is accurate....i think i will make that move to one of those AFR set-ups....
i appreciate yours and everyones help....
__________________
1993 z28 Camaro
|
|
|
04-19-2009, 10:38 PM
|
#25
|
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
|
anytime!
__________________
TMR performance
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|