Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-17-2009, 11:01 PM   #1
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
2011 Mustang GT: 5.0 is Back!

Mustang GT will come with a DOHC VVT 5.0 making 412hp and about 380ftlbs of torque.
check out Jalkopnik.com or Edmunds's Insideline.com

Edmunds is reporting that the GT will come in at 3750lbs though.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 11:03 PM   #2
BurninrubberGT
 
BurninrubberGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: south & north nj
Posts: 1,482
iTrader: (0)
uh oh


are they going up in price also?
__________________
99 Legacy - slow winter dd
04 GTO - less slower summer dd
84 Trans Am - Father's car - all original / original owner

Last edited by BurninrubberGT; 12-17-2009 at 11:04 PM.
BurninrubberGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 11:04 PM   #3
Anti_Rice_Guy
The Mayor / 2009 Member of the Year / Moderator
 
Anti_Rice_Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northwest
Posts: 8,869
iTrader: (1)
Social Networks:

New Camaro has trouble brewing
__________________
1995 Z28 Convertible A4 13.78 @ 100 (CAI, high flow cat, catback, 160 thermo, hypertech, Strano springs, Koni yellows, sway bars, 3 pt. UMI SFC)
2018 Sea Doo GTX - 3 cylinders and das boooooost
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Is English your 2nd language? Did you graduate high school? Your posts make my head hurt.
Team FARM
Anti_Rice_Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 11:08 PM   #4
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Bet your ass.
No pricing has been released, but price wise it will be just a few ticks off a Camaro SS or Charger RT.
29,999 for base GT
32,450 for GT luxury.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 11:34 PM   #5
DaSkinnyGuy
 
DaSkinnyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: unknown
Posts: 2,776
iTrader: (0)
the almighty 4.94L is back
__________________
2000 Pewter Trans am, M6, SLP Lid,LS6 intake,Kooks 1 7/8" Long tube header,Classic Chambered Powersticks, hurst,off road X-pipe, Strano springs & Koni's, Monster level 2 clutch, HPtuners wide band tuned and a homemade ram air box sealed off.
DaSkinnyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 11:35 PM   #6
98tadriver
10 Second Club; Has fan club
 
98tadriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Delmont nj
Posts: 4,369
iTrader: (17)
the mustang is going to have a 5.0 VTECH motor!?
__________________
01' Z06 62k miles. Vararam, Longtubes, off road xpipe, tuned by me. Times TBA

2001 Corvette, Bolt ons , tuned 10.75@124.56 mph 1.38 60' Sold

1997 Saturn Sc1 5spd DOHC swapped
Bolt ons, decked head, stock intake cam on exhaust side, lotsa weight redux
13.22@102.32 mph 1.93 60'
12's on moda? One day
98tadriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 12:06 AM   #7
procamaroz28
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: south river
Posts: 1,289
iTrader: (7)
vvt? like the cts's????

anyways sounds nice def. want one!!!
__________________
-Pete-

BLK 07 CTS M6 2.8
procamaroz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 12:23 AM   #8
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Variable Valve Timing is something that is pretty common on OHC engines, and now on OHV engines.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 02:10 AM   #9
SteveR
I <3 sheep
 
SteveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
iTrader: (1)
3750? wow, the new muscle cars (Challenger, Camaro, and Mustang) are only a few ticks under a fully prepped Crown Vic P-71 @3906

The DOHC is a nice design, but damn is it expensive to do a cams swap on them.

The real advantage the Mustang had over its competitors was it's price and weight. Looks like both are going bye-bye.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
Steve has a thing for sheep....
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
SteveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 05:20 AM   #10
thunder
12 Second Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: metuchen, nj
Posts: 1,476
iTrader: (0)
with the new V6 they had to give the V8 more power. otherwise the V8 would be kinda pointless
__________________
thunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 05:48 AM   #11
LS1Hawk
 
LS1Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,308
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveR View Post
The real advantage the Mustang had over its competitors was it's price and weight. Looks like both are going bye-bye.
Just what I was thinking
__________________
John
LS1Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 06:28 AM   #12
MonmouthCtyAntz
 
MonmouthCtyAntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Browns Mills NJ/ Rotondo West FL
Posts: 3,054
iTrader: (1)
Yup that will be my next car...
__________________

AI HCR 241's , Lunati 223/236 .615/.626 114+2 , Full Exhaust , Ported Fast 92 , Ported LS2 TB , Veraram , 85mm MAF , Circle D 4000 , 3.42's , GTP 36# , CSP Dyno tune. More on the way
420 HP/367 TQ on a Unlocked Converter & still climbing.
MonmouthCtyAntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 07:35 AM   #13
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,366
iTrader: (12)
what does it look like?
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 08:56 AM   #14
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,693
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

I think Edmunds is wrong. The current Mustang is in the vicinity of 34xx#. I doubt that a new motor would bring up that figure by 300#. If its true, then it lost every advantage it had over the Camaro in driving dynamics. That would be a serious shame.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 09:46 AM   #15
MonmouthCtyAntz
 
MonmouthCtyAntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Browns Mills NJ/ Rotondo West FL
Posts: 3,054
iTrader: (1)
The S197's were heavier then the sn95's/new edge's and still faster by leaps and bounds...I cant see the addition of the 5.0 making it much heavier. Guess well just have to wait until it comes out. The extra 100 hp will certainly help.
__________________

AI HCR 241's , Lunati 223/236 .615/.626 114+2 , Full Exhaust , Ported Fast 92 , Ported LS2 TB , Veraram , 85mm MAF , Circle D 4000 , 3.42's , GTP 36# , CSP Dyno tune. More on the way
420 HP/367 TQ on a Unlocked Converter & still climbing.
MonmouthCtyAntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 10:46 AM   #16
Foosh
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Bank Area,NJ
Posts: 216
iTrader: (0)
It will help alot, up until recently Mustangs have been fairly slow compared to the competition. And i truely love the 5.0's my buddy had a white procharged 93 gt with a full roadcourse suspension and may not have had much striaght line traction but cornered better then any car i've driven. It had welded sfc, and a full kenny brown coilover suspension kit.
Foosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 12:05 PM   #17
Slow-V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 2,295
iTrader: (10)
I believe there is a 6 speed tranny also which weighs more and they might go Independent rear on it also!! Also there are 2 more cams which adds 20 or so more lbs and more valves and valve springs. When it comes down to it I can see were the extra weight comes from. Still a Ugly car with very cheap parts. I do not miss either of my Mustangs.
__________________
Jeff
2002 WS6 T/A.. M6..Built 383 TMR tune..461rwhp,458rwtq
2009 G8 GT. Bone stock 13.6@103.. Vararam Intake, GXP Axlebacks, LS2 FRC's
1998 Corvette Convertible, Vararam Intake+Power Duct, Fast 90/90, Ti Axleback..12.8@110
2003 Cobra Convertible 10th Anniversary
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Local car cruise schedule..
http://www.cliffscalendar.com/
Slow-V6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 03:27 PM   #18
BigRocsFirebird
 
BigRocsFirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sewell,NJ Washington Township
Posts: 2,416
iTrader: (0)
i was reading about this around 3 months ago. pretty sweet
__________________
1995 Pontiac Firebird - V6 few mods

1988 Mustang - supercharged, heads/cam etc...

2012 Mustang - 5.0 6spd / 437rwhp 420trq

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTs1ow View Post
Verts are gay and stalkers ride in them.
BigRocsFirebird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 03:40 PM   #19
LTb1ow
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
 
LTb1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,936
iTrader: (8)
Will ford continue to make stock 5.0s with skinnies and slicks?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil View Post
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
LTb1ow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 06:49 PM   #20
GP99GT
Mr Fantastic
 
GP99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTs1ow View Post
Will ford continue to make stock 5.0s with skinnies and slicks?
cant forget cowl hoods and flowmasters
__________________
Matt

B18B1 FTW
GP99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 08:18 PM   #21
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
There is no IRS for the Mustang planned untill the next platform.

The 3750 is now apparently a joke of soem sort? Current car is around 3600lbs, so its not that odd to figure it would be 100lbs heaver with a lot more HD parts.
The Mustang's chassis was designed to take no more then 350hp without moddification, hence why the GT500 has a lot more chassis band-aids that help the car stay together.
Mustang does have the 6spd auto and manual trans, as well as several other up to date features.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 10:40 PM   #22
Foosh
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Bank Area,NJ
Posts: 216
iTrader: (0)
Why is every one doing IRS??? i mean i get it for track but overall, its more expensive and has a considerable amount of things that can go bad.
Foosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 10:53 PM   #23
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Its evolution of cars. IRS offers much better poise and agility, not to mention helps on packaging a vehicle.
IRS isnt just for track, but for ride, comfort, and steering and control ususaly feels better with IRS. You also increase the envelope on what the car can do.
The Mustang GT with track package has shown what you can do to maximized a solid axle set up, but it suffers tons over bumps in the road. The Camaro and Challenger have much better ride as well as better performance. While the Mustang's steering is better, the Camaro SS tends to get better reviews as far as its poise on the track, vs the Mustang.
Mustang will deffinatly turn up the pony car wars, something we havent seen since 87 when the fbodies saw the return of the 350.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 11:42 PM   #24
Foosh
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Bank Area,NJ
Posts: 216
iTrader: (0)
Yeah i understand... kinda sad, like seeing trucks go from SFA to IFS
Foosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 12:27 AM   #25
SteveR
I <3 sheep
 
SteveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belmar
Posts: 4,907
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
There is no IRS for the Mustang planned untill the next platform.

The 3750 is now apparently a joke of soem sort? Current car is around 3600lbs, so its not that odd to figure it would be 100lbs heaver with a lot more HD parts.
The Mustang's chassis was designed to take no more then 350hp without moddification, hence why the GT500 has a lot more chassis band-aids that help the car stay together.
Mustang does have the 6spd auto and manual trans, as well as several other up to date features.
I'm sure the motor alone will be like 150# more. Twice as many cams and the heads are a lot bigger too. I'm not sure what Ford did with the 2010 Mustang, but the 2008 was around 3400#. 3750 for a sports car is a bit high considering my comparison before was that a fully police prepped Crown Vic with the light bars, push bumper, sirens, cage, radios, and everything else is 3906#. The civilainized P-71 is around 3750.

I really like a lot of the new technology manufacturers are coming up with for new cars, but damn is it going to be really expensive to mod these cars. I mean, with IRS, just ask any Vette guy how much it cost to put a decent rear in there. Then the DOHC motor is a LOT for a simple cam swap. You're looking at like $5k for the rear, and another $3k for the cam swap.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy View Post
Steve has a thing for sheep....
'78 Big Wheel- 2FWFP
SteveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.