Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2009, 11:42 AM   #1
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
LCA Questions

I'm ordering a set of LCA's from either spohn or umi. i trust either brand so thats not the question. my question is....




What would be best for my application.


Right now i have a 9'' rear with relocated lca's for now. i wanted to pick up some tubular lca's and have noticed two styles...Spherical Rod/Poly Floor Board Mounts....or Double Spherical Rod Ends. The way im understanding by looking at them would be that the spherical/poly mount would be for more of a streetable car and the double sphere ends might be a little too harsh for the street. either way im getting the adjustable lca's but just wanna hear some opinions on the differences in the ends.



discuss/elaborate???
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 11:52 AM   #2
DevilDougWS6
11 Second Club
 
DevilDougWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 1,566
iTrader: (2)
best for driveability would be poly/poly, installed properly they wont squeek or make any noise. for best performance get the spherical rod end on both ends, they tend to make noise and be a little more harsh.

for the middle of the road, you can get the poly/rod end combo. adjustable is good to get if you are hardcore racing.
__________________

J E R S E Y S H O R E O W N S Y O U
12 Sonic Turbo
07 Malibu SS
04 Silverado SS - Sold
00 Trans Am WS6 - Sold

-.:: United States Marine Corps ::.-
DevilDougWS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:00 PM   #3
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,341
iTrader: (12)
pm paul, hardcorez28, he is a spohn dealer. i would suggest poly/spherical if you are that concerned. otherwise spherical all the way! chromoly too!
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:00 PM   #4
MonmouthCtyAntz
 
MonmouthCtyAntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Browns Mills NJ/ Rotondo West FL
Posts: 3,054
iTrader: (1)
Love my hotchkis here....
__________________

AI HCR 241's , Lunati 223/236 .615/.626 114+2 , Full Exhaust , Ported Fast 92 , Ported LS2 TB , Veraram , 85mm MAF , Circle D 4000 , 3.42's , GTP 36# , CSP Dyno tune. More on the way
420 HP/367 TQ on a Unlocked Converter & still climbing.
MonmouthCtyAntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:02 PM   #5
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,341
iTrader: (12)
also, get adjustable. especially with relocation brackets. those are welded right?
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:10 PM   #6
MonmouthCtyAntz
 
MonmouthCtyAntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Browns Mills NJ/ Rotondo West FL
Posts: 3,054
iTrader: (1)
Bolt here
__________________

AI HCR 241's , Lunati 223/236 .615/.626 114+2 , Full Exhaust , Ported Fast 92 , Ported LS2 TB , Veraram , 85mm MAF , Circle D 4000 , 3.42's , GTP 36# , CSP Dyno tune. More on the way
420 HP/367 TQ on a Unlocked Converter & still climbing.
MonmouthCtyAntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:11 PM   #7
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,341
iTrader: (12)
thread locker?
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:20 PM   #8
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
yeah i think i can deal with a little bit of road noise and grab the double sphericals. 40 bucks extra for chromoly isnt bad. hell i paid 50 for my adjustable panhard...i guess i can swing it.





anyone else with some testimony?
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:03 PM   #9
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
I wish WS6ZXR was still up. Kelly Drown had info on just about every type of control arm up there that he ran autocrossing. I think the poly/poly setup was worse than stock because of binding.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:57 PM   #10
Jensend
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 112
iTrader: (1)
For maximum adjustability and versatility on and off track the totally spherical LCAs are probably your best bet. Chrome moly for safety and longevity. However, don't underestimate the amount of noise that they will both generate and transmit to the car's interior. They are loud and telegraph every expansion joint and bump you hit. I've had my Spohn units for 5 years and they work well for HPDE or autox. They are, however noisy enough that I have to warn people who ride in the car that the noise is natural, not a mechanical issue. If you value comfort and quiet more than performance, spherical LCAs are not for you.
__________________
Jensend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:12 PM   #11
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,151
iTrader: (27)
No testimony, just a few thoughts. I’m not familiar with these particular parts and I’m not looking them up, so I am speaking in general terms.

I don’t see how spherical bushings would ride worse than poly bushings. In fact based on their improved range of motion compared to the inherent bind issues with polyurethane bushings, I might think that spherical bearings might ride unnoticeably better. Plus it isn’t like polyurethane bushings isolate vibration any better than solid bushings, you are fooling yourself to think otherwise. Spherical bushings may wear out much faster unless they are sealed. Road debris might eat them up fast. If they are not sealed and it is a street car I’d think three times about spending money on spherical bushings.

I like adjustable stuff, but that can be a double edged sword – they need to be properly adjusted. In the wrong hands adjustability is a curse.

I don’t know if the chromoly is required. Do the ‘regular’ ones fail?

Also, IMO, given the application, ride quality should not be a concern. If it is, put the stock stuff back in and spend the money on stickers & audio.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:25 PM   #12
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
No testimony, just a few thoughts. I’m not familiar with these particular parts and I’m not looking them up, so I am speaking in general terms.

I don’t see how spherical bushings would ride worse than poly bushings. In fact based on their improved range of motion compared to the inherent bind issues with polyurethane bushings, I might think that spherical bearings might ride unnoticeably better. Plus it isn’t like polyurethane bushings isolate vibration any better than solid bushings, you are fooling yourself to think otherwise. Spherical bushings may wear out much faster unless they are sealed. Road debris might eat them up fast. If they are not sealed and it is a street car I’d think three times about spending money on spherical bushings.

I like adjustable stuff, but that can be a double edged sword – they need to be properly adjusted. In the wrong hands adjustability is a curse.

I don’t know if the chromoly is required. Do the ‘regular’ ones fail?

Also, IMO, given the application, ride quality should not be a concern. If it is, put the stock stuff back in and spend the money on stickers & audio.



ride quality is not a concern. im just covering all my bases before i spend the money.


im just open to hear different voices about whats going on. some good stuff so far. anyone else?
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:36 PM   #13
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,341
iTrader: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
No testimony, just a few thoughts. I’m not familiar with these particular parts and I’m not looking them up, so I am speaking in general terms.

I don’t see how spherical bushings would ride worse than poly bushings. In fact based on their improved range of motion compared to the inherent bind issues with polyurethane bushings, I might think that spherical bearings might ride unnoticeably better. Plus it isn’t like polyurethane bushings isolate vibration any better than solid bushings, you are fooling yourself to think otherwise. Spherical bushings may wear out much faster unless they are sealed. Road debris might eat them up fast. If they are not sealed and it is a street car I’d think three times about spending money on spherical bushings.

I like adjustable stuff, but that can be a double edged sword – they need to be properly adjusted. In the wrong hands adjustability is a curse.

I don’t know if the chromoly is required. Do the ‘regular’ ones fail?

Also, IMO, given the application, ride quality should not be a concern. If it is, put the stock stuff back in and spend the money on stickers & audio.
i believe the poly absorbs the road noise to a much greater extent than the spherical rod ends. its basically metal to metal with a spherical rod end. maybe compare it to solid motor mounts vs poly vs stock rubber. it isn't that extreme but comparable. my poly's are rather noisey when its cold out though, not terrible just more prevalent.
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 05:33 PM   #14
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
It is really about personal opinion.

Having poly at both ends will provide the best ride quality going down the road.
Having the bushing on the body side and spherical on the rear will give the solid suspension response but still ride good
Spherical at both ends has the best articulation and the most direct suspension response you can get but tends to be noisy and a bit bangy while driving.

Peronally, I have no problems living with spherical bearings at both ends. Drove my 91 RS around like that for years and as soon as I have money to upgrade the suspension on my 99 I will be doing the same again. The spherical ends do require a little more attentive maintenance to keep clean and lubed
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2009, 06:55 PM   #15
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Im surprised no one has done anything regarding delrin bushings.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped

Last edited by BonzoHansen; 03-25-2009 at 07:31 PM. Reason: Delran is a town in NJ....
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2009, 11:22 PM   #16
KirkEvil
10 Second Club
 
KirkEvil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eatontown
Posts: 1,647
iTrader: (11)
I remember seeing poly spherical rod ends when I was in the market for LCAs. They were advertised as the benefits of metal spherical ends with the noise reduction of polyurethane.

Delrin is a nice material for some bushings, but it is brittle and does not do well with oil. It would not hold up the stress and grime a car would put it through. Polyurethane may be slightly less efficient, but it is durable and chemical resistant.
__________________
1999 C5 FRC: 12.7@114
2008 TBSS: 12.48@108
2017 Silverado 2500 do you even lift breh?
KirkEvil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 01:12 PM   #17
DevilDougWS6
11 Second Club
 
DevilDougWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 1,566
iTrader: (2)
poly end will NOT bind if installed properly. people tend to torque the bolts down before putting a load on the rear and that cause them to bind. i have polys on mine and zero problems whatsoever.
__________________

J E R S E Y S H O R E O W N S Y O U
12 Sonic Turbo
07 Malibu SS
04 Silverado SS - Sold
00 Trans Am WS6 - Sold

-.:: United States Marine Corps ::.-
DevilDougWS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 01:43 PM   #18
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilDougWS6 View Post
poly end will NOT bind if installed properly. people tend to torque the bolts down before putting a load on the rear and that cause them to bind. i have polys on mine and zero problems whatsoever.
So your suspension never creaks?

Alternatively, if you have servicable poly ends (with zerk fittings) then it shouldn't be a problem.

Last edited by WildBillyT; 03-26-2009 at 01:47 PM.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 02:16 PM   #19
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,341
iTrader: (12)
i have grease fittings on my poly ends. they are pretty good but will squeak when very cold.
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 02:24 PM   #20
KirkEvil
10 Second Club
 
KirkEvil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eatontown
Posts: 1,647
iTrader: (11)
I also have the poly with grease fittings and I have not had a problem. grease them up about every 5k miles and they should last without making noise
__________________
1999 C5 FRC: 12.7@114
2008 TBSS: 12.48@108
2017 Silverado 2500 do you even lift breh?
KirkEvil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 04:35 PM   #21
Frosty
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 7,108
iTrader: (1)
I had poly bushings on a lot of my fbodies and if installed correctly and greased correctly I never heard a peep out of them.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS Redline package, ESC Novi 1500 tuned by EFX, Might Mouse wild catch can, GM STB, smoked ZL1 3rd brake light, Xpel XR Black 35% tint all around, Street Scene front splitter, C7 Carbon ZL1 side skirts, Drake Muscle Car Wickerbill spoiler

2010 Infiniti G37x-Moonlight White w/Graphite interior. Stock...for now. Xpel XR Black tint(hey it's a mod lol)

Last edited by Frosty; 03-26-2009 at 04:35 PM.
Frosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 05:17 PM   #22
camaroAL
10 Second Club
 
camaroAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lake hopatcong
Posts: 331
iTrader: (1)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosty View Post
I had poly bushings on a lot of my fbodies and if installed correctly and greased correctly I never heard a peep out of them.
same here!
__________________
TMR performance
camaroAL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 10:38 AM   #23
Batman
11 Second Club
 
Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fishkill, NY
Posts: 1,278
iTrader: (1)
I agree with everything above, especially how noisy double rod ends are. If you can take the noise then i guess they are the way to go but I had them for 2 weeks and wanted to throw them in the garbage. I'm running poly/poly now and am cutting 1.4 60Ft times at the track with no issues, so for all but the most hardcore racer poly should be more then enough for you.
__________________
-Nick
9/11/01- Never Forget
2002 Pontiac Trans-Am WS6 # 206
Chasing 10's
469RWH/437RWTQ
11.05 @ 123
Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 10:55 AM   #24
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman View Post
I agree with everything above, especially how noisy double rod ends are. If you can take the noise then i guess they are the way to go but I had them for 2 weeks and wanted to throw them in the garbage. I'm running poly/poly now and am cutting 1.4 60Ft times at the track with no issues, so for all but the most hardcore racer poly should be more then enough for you.



your car must be auto?
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 09:25 AM   #25
Batman
11 Second Club
 
Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fishkill, NY
Posts: 1,278
iTrader: (1)
It is now, used to be an M6 but I got tired of replacing clutches and transmissions, still cut 1.6's on the M6 though
__________________
-Nick
9/11/01- Never Forget
2002 Pontiac Trans-Am WS6 # 206
Chasing 10's
469RWH/437RWTQ
11.05 @ 123
Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.